Genotype-dependent responses of chickpea to high temperature and moderately increased light

被引:3
|
作者
Zhou, Rong [1 ]
Yu, Xiaqing [2 ]
Huang, Sijie [3 ]
Song, Xiaoming [4 ]
Rosenqvist, Eva [5 ]
Ottosen, Carl-Otto [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Food Sci, Aarhus N, Denmark
[2] Nanjing Agr Univ, Natl Key Lab Crop Genet & Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Ecol & Environm, Nanjing Inst Environm Sci, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] North China Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Life Sci, Tangshan, Hebei, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Plant & Environm Sci, Taastrup, Denmark
关键词
Chickpea; High temperature; Leaf water status; Light intensity; Photosynthesis; HEAT-STRESS; CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; CICER-ARIETINUM; INTENSITY; DROUGHT;
D O I
10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.06.030
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Our aim was to understand how moderately increased light intensities influenced the response of chickpea to high temperature. Three chickpea genotypes (Acc#3, Acc#7 and Acc#8) were treated at control (26 degrees C and 300 mu mol m(-2) s(-1 )photosynthetic photon flux density/PPFD), high temperature (38 degrees C and 300 mu mol m(-2) s(-1) PPFD), increased light intensity (26 degrees C and 600 mu mol(-1) m(-2 )s(-1) PPFD) and combination of increased light and temperature (38 degrees C and 600 mu mol(-1) m(-2 )s(-1) PPFD). The net photosynthetic rate (P-N) of Acc#3 and Acc#8 significantly decreased at high temperature regardless of light intensity. The P-N of all three genotypes at increased light intensity was significantly higher than that at high temperature. The intracellular CO2 concentration (Q), stomatal conductance (g(s)) and transpiration rate (E) of Acc#3 and Acc#8 at increased light intensity with or without high temperature significantly decreased in comparison with control and individually high temperature treatment. The relative water content of Acc#3 at high temperature and the combination treatment decreased as compared with control. The relative water content of Acc#7 at control was higher than the other three treatments. The F-v/F-m (Maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II) of leaves from the three genotypes at 38 degrees C were lower than at 26 degrees C regardless of light intensity. The high temperature decreased chlorophyll content in the lower bottom leaf of Acc#7 and Acc#8 than control. In conclusion, chickpeas showed a higher net photosynthetic rate at increased light intensity to withstand heat stress, which was genotype-dependent. Physiological responses of different chickpea genotypes to increased temperature and light intensity indicated that distinct responsive mechanism of photosynthesis. This study provides information on how chickpea respond to high temperature and increased light intensity, which will help us to improve chickpea to deal with future climate changes.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 359
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genomic analysis of genotype-dependent responses of marine larvae to temperature change
    Curole, J. P.
    Manahan, D. T.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 49 : E42 - E42
  • [2] Genotype-dependent contribution of CBF transcription factors to long-term acclimation to high light and cool temperature
    Baker, Christopher R.
    Stewart, Jared J.
    Amstutz, Cynthia L.
    Ching, Lindsey G.
    Johnson, Jeffrey D.
    Niyogi, Krishna K.
    Adams, William W.
    Demmig-Adams, Barbara
    [J]. PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 45 (02): : 392 - 411
  • [3] Molecular mechanisms underlying genotype-dependent responses to dietary restriction
    Schleit, Jennifer
    Johnson, Simon C.
    Bennett, Christopher F.
    Simko, Marissa
    Trongtham, Natalie
    Castanza, Anthony
    Hsieh, Edward J.
    Moller, Richard M.
    Wasko, Brian M.
    Delaney, Joe R.
    Sutphin, George L.
    Carr, Daniel
    Murakami, Christopher J.
    Tocchi, Autumn
    Xian, Bo
    Chen, Weiyang
    Yu, Tao
    Goswami, Sarani
    Higgins, Sean
    Holmberg, Mollie
    Jeong, Ki-Soo
    Kim, Jin R.
    Klum, Shannon
    Liao, Eric
    Lin, Michael S.
    Lo, Winston
    Miller, Hillary
    Olsen, Brady
    Peng, Zhao J.
    Pollard, Tom
    Pradeep, Prarthana
    Pruett, Dillon
    Rai, Dilreet
    Ros, Vanessa
    Singh, Minnie
    Spector, Benjamin L.
    Vander Wende, Helen
    An, Elroy H.
    Fletcher, Marissa
    Jelic, Monika
    Rabinovitch, Peter S.
    MacCoss, Michael J.
    Han, Jing-Dong J.
    Kennedy, Brian K.
    Kaeberlein, Matt
    [J]. AGING CELL, 2013, 12 (06) : 1050 - 1061
  • [4] Molecular mechanisms underlying genotype-dependent responses to dietary restriction
    Kaeberlein, M.
    [J]. FEBS JOURNAL, 2012, 279 : 18 - 18
  • [5] MODIFICATION OF ETHANOL EFFECTS BY BICUCULLINE - GENOTYPE-DEPENDENT RESPONSES AND INHERITANCE
    PHILLIPS, TJ
    DUDEK, BC
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 98 (04) : 549 - 555
  • [6] MOLECULAR MECHANISMS UNDERLYING GENOTYPE-DEPENDENT RESPONSES TO DIETARY RESTRICTION
    Johnson, S. C.
    Schleit, J.
    Kaeberlein, M.
    Bennett, C. F.
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 148 - 148
  • [7] High genotype-dependent mortality at metamorphosis in the Pacific oyster
    Plough, L., V
    Hedgecock, D.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2012, 52 : E139 - E139
  • [8] Irrigation effects on elephant grass morphology, and its genotype-dependent responses
    Ribeiro, Robson Elpidio Pereira
    de Mello, Alexandre Carneiro Leao
    da Cunha, Marcio Vieira
    Costa, Suellen Brandao de Miranda
    Coelho, Janerson Jose
    de Souza, Rayanne Thalita de Almeida
    dos Santos, Mercia Virginia Ferreira
    [J]. GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2023, 78 (01) : 194 - 203
  • [9] Genotype-dependent Strategies to "Overcome" Excessive Light: Insights into Non-Photochemical Quenching under High Light Intensity
    Shomali, Aida
    Aliniaeifard, Sasan
    Mohammadian, Mohammad
    Lotfi, Mahmoud
    Kalaji, Hazem M.
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2023, 175 (06)
  • [10] APOE genotype-dependent pharmacogenetic responses to rapamycin for preventing Alzheimer's disease
    Lin, Ai-Ling
    Parikh, Ishita
    Yanckello, Lucille M.
    White, Renee S.
    Hartz, Anika M. S.
    Taylor, Chase E.
    McCulloch, Scott D.
    Thalman, Scott W.
    Xia, Mengfan
    McCarty, Katie
    Ubele, Margo
    Head, Elizabeth
    Hyder, Fahmeed
    Sanganahalli, Basavaraju G.
    [J]. NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE, 2020, 139