COMPARING INNOVATIVE XR SYSTEMS IN CULTURAL HERITAGE. A CASE STUDY

被引:3
|
作者
Carrozzino, M. [1 ]
Voinea, G-D [2 ]
Duguleana, M. [2 ]
Boboc, R. G. [2 ]
Bergamasco, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Univ & Perfezionamento St Anna, TeCIP, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[2] Univ Transilvania Din Brasov, Fac Mech Engn, Brasov 500036, Romania
关键词
User Study; Virtual Reality; Augmented Reality; Mixed Reality; Education; Interaction; Manipulability; AUGMENTED REALITY; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-373-2019
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The technological advances made in the recent years in the field of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have led to a revolution in many adjacent areas. One of these is Cultural Heritage (CH), as the new array of XR technologies (a concept integrating Augmented, Mixed and Virtual Reality) is offering new interaction possibilities. The purpose of this paper is to compare several such technologies at application level, and to classify them based on common features such as Interaction, Manipulability, Ease of Use and others. The study presented in this paper was carried out during the H2020 project eHERITAGE ('Expanding the Research and Innovation Capacity in Cultural Heritage Virtual Reality Applications'). The action had as output multiple XR systems/applications. We compare 4 of them: a smartphone-based AR application, a digital book with 3D elements deployed on a large touchscreen, a large holographic display and a bow simulator built using a VR headset and a mechatronic system. We evaluate these innovative systems in the context of the 2 educational events, when over 4000 participants interacted with our team. Results show that systems with greater interaction and immersion features were preferred over the others. Furthermore, Mixed Reality was preferred over Virtual and Augmented Reality.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cultural heritage.
    Strasser, Peter
    [J]. OSTERREICHISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR VOLKSKUNDE, 2006, 109 (04): : 483 - 487
  • [2] Cultural Routes and Networks of Knowledge: Identity and Valorization of Cultural Heritage and European Heritage. The Case Study of Piedmont
    Beltramo, S.
    [J]. ALMATOURISM-JOURNAL OF TOURISM CULTURE AND TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 4 (07): : 13 - 43
  • [3] Cultural Heritage. An Introduction
    Catteeuw, Paul
    [J]. VOLKSKUNDE, 2015, 116 (02): : 236 - 238
  • [4] Cultural Heritage. An Introduction
    Kagermeier, Andreas
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR TOURISMUSWISSENSCHAFT, 2014, 6 (01): : 120 - 120
  • [5] RADIO AS A MEANS OF COMMUNICATING CULTURAL HERITAGE. FERNANDINA RADIO: A CASE STUDY
    Lorenzo, Marianela Davila
    Martinez, C. Gladys Gonzalez
    Martinez, Marta Preciado
    [J]. REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD Y SOCIEDAD, 2018, 10 (05): : 416 - 423
  • [6] Historic and Cultural Heritage.
    Mielke, R.
    [J]. PETERMANNS MITTEILUNGEN, 1924, 70 (3-4): : 104 - 104
  • [7] Cultural Heritage. An Introduction
    Verhovsek, Johann
    [J]. ANTHROPOS, 2015, 110 (02) : 665 - 667
  • [8] Innovative Technologies for Cultural Heritage. Tattoo Sensors and AI: The New Life of Cultural Assets
    Talamo, Maurizio
    Valentini, Federica
    Dimitri, Andrea
    Allegrini, Ivo
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (07)
  • [9] Designing access to audiovisual cultural heritage. The case of the Carrot
    Salgado, Mariana
    Sanders, Willemien
    [J]. 2015 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL-IMAGE TECHNOLOGY & INTERNET-BASED SYSTEMS (SITIS), 2015, : 760 - 767
  • [10] Promotion of Cultural Heritage. A case of a little village in Apennines
    Cinieri, Valentina
    [J]. LESS MORE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN LANDSCAPE, 2012, (16): : 77 - 85