Safe conversion of mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients with sirolimus-based immunosuppression

被引:3
|
作者
El-Agroudy, Amgad E. [1 ]
El-Dahshan, Khaled F. [1 ]
Wafa, Ehab W. [1 ]
Sheashaa, Hussien A. [1 ]
Gad, Ziad A. [1 ]
Ismail, Amani M. [1 ]
Shokeir, Ahmed A. [1 ]
Ghoneim, Mohamed A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Mansoura, Egypt
关键词
azathioprine; conversion; mycophenolate mofetil; transplantation; RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ACUTE REJECTION; LONG-TERM; CYCLOSPORINE; PREVENTION; METAANALYSIS; MULTICENTER; WITHDRAWAL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.00988.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a powerful immunosuppressive drug with established efficacy and safety. The long-term use of MMF may bring increased risk of for infection and malignancy and also increased cost of transplantation. The search for minimization of immunosuppressive protocol has led to an open randomized clinical trial of conversion from MMF to azathioprine (AZA). Methods: A total of 50 kidney allograft recipients treated with prednisone, sirolimus and MMF were randomized into two groups: converted (AZA group) and continuing (MMF group). The average duration of MMF therapy prior to conversion was 43 months in each group. Inclusion criteria included: patients with serum creatinine levels of less than 200 mu mol/L; no past history of acute vascular rejection or recent acute rejection 6 months before randomization; and normal liver function tests. Results: Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. During the 12 month observation period, there were no acute rejection episodes in either group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival or function. AZA-treated patients had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal complications (P = 0.03). Daily cost reduction in the AZA group was more than $US8.79/day per patient. Conclusion: In general, replacing MMF with AZA in stable renal transplant recipients is well tolerated and was cost effective with no increased risk of rejection. As the this study was on relatively small samples, larger and longer follow-up studies will be needed to confirm these expected advantages for the long-term outcome and to assess the long-term safety of this minimization of immunosuppressive therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 261
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to mycophenolate sodium among renal transplant recipients on a sirolimus-based regimen
    Kahan, B. D.
    Podbielski, J.
    Childs, B.
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 40 (05) : 1429 - 1434
  • [2] Platelet activation markers after conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus-based immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients
    Graff, Jochen
    Harder, Sebastian
    Reiche, Claudia
    Scheuermann, Ernst-Heinrich
    Gossmann, Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 50 (12) : 873 - 879
  • [3] Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppression for Treatment of Cutaneous Warts in Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Shahidi, Shahrzad
    Moeinzadeh, Firouzeh
    Mohammadi, Morteza
    Gholamrezaei, Ali
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2011, 5 (05) : 351 - 353
  • [4] Sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for calcineurin-free immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients
    Pescovitz, MD
    Govani, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2001, 38 (04) : S16 - S21
  • [5] Conversion from azathioprine to Mycophenolate Mofetil in pediatric renal transplant recipients
    Charbit, M
    Guest, G
    Gagnadoux, MF
    Niaudet, P
    Broyer, M
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (07) : S184 - S184
  • [6] The impact of sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids on wound healing in 513 kidney-transplant recipients
    Flechner, SM
    Zhou, LM
    Derweesh, I
    Mastroianni, B
    Savas, K
    Goldfarb, D
    Modlin, CS
    Krishnamurthi, V
    Novick, A
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (12) : 1729 - 1734
  • [7] Is mycophenolate mofetil less safe than azathioprine in elderly renal transplant recipients?
    Johnson, DW
    Nicol, DL
    Purdie, DM
    Preston, JM
    Brown, AM
    Hawley, CM
    Campbell, SB
    Wall, D
    Griffin, AD
    Isbel, NM
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (07) : 1158 - 1163
  • [8] Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine and azathioprine in heart transplant recipients
    Teebken, OE
    Strüber, M
    Harringer, W
    Pichlmaier, MA
    Haverich, A
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 34 (04) : 1265 - 1268
  • [9] Proteinuria after Conversion to Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppression in Cardiac Transplant Recipients: A Five Year Analysis
    Raichlin, E.
    Al-Omari, M. A.
    Edwards, B. S.
    Daly, R. C.
    Frntz, R. F. P.
    Clavell, A. C. L.
    Pereira, N. L.
    Schirger, J. A.
    Kushwaha, S. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 29 (02): : S50 - S51
  • [10] Conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression using daclizumab bridge therapy in renal transplant recipients
    Sundberg, AK
    Rohr, MS
    Hartmann, EL
    Adams, PL
    Stratta, RJ
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 18 : 61 - 66