Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems

被引:216
|
作者
Arias-Arevalo, Paola [1 ,2 ]
Martin-Lopez, Berta [3 ]
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valle, Fac Social & Econ Sci, Dept Econ, Cali, Colombia
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Environm Sci & Technol, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Fac Sustainabil, Inst Eth & Transdisciplinary Sustainabil Res, Luneburg, Germany
[4] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies, As, Norway
[5] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Oslo, Norway
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2017年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
ecosystem services valuation; environmental ethics; environmental management; environmental motivations; environmental values; transcendental values; value pluralism; watersheds; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; SOCIOCULTURAL VALUATION; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT; VALUE ORIENTATIONS; FRAMEWORK; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.5751/ES-09812-220443
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The values (i.e., importance) that people place on ecosystems have been identified as a crucial dimension of sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Recently, the call for integrating plural values of ecosystems beyond intrinsic and instrumental values has prompted the notion of "relational values." With the aim of contributing to environmental management, we assess the environmental motivations (i.e., egoistic, biospheric, altruistic) and values that people attribute to the ecosystems of the mid-upper stream of the Otun River watershed, central Andes, Colombia. We analyzed 589 questionnaires that were collected in urban and rural areas of the Otun River watershed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regressions. We found salient biospheric motivations and the attribution of plural values (i.e., intrinsic, relational, and instrumental) to the ecosystems of the mid-upper stream of the Otun River watershed. Particularly, relational values were the most frequently mentioned value domain. Further, our results showed that environmental motivations and socioeconomic factors are associated with the expression of different value domains. We found negative associations between egoistic motivations and intrinsic values and between rural respondents and instrumental values. We found positive associations between altruistic motivations and relational values and between rural respondents and both intrinsic and relational values. In light of our results, we argue that intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values coexist in people's narratives about the importance of ecosystems. Plural valuation approaches could be enhanced by differentiating relational from instrumental values and by expressing them in nonmonetary terms. We argue that multiple values of ecosystems expressed by rural and urban societies should be included in environmental management to tackle social conflicts and consider the diverse needs and interests of different social actors.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stephen Kellert's development and contribution of relational values in social-ecological systems
    Ross, Helen
    Witt, Katherine
    Jones, Natalie A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 35 : 46 - 53
  • [2] Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm
    Klain, Sarah C.
    Olmsted, Paige
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Satterfield, Terre
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08):
  • [3] CLSER: A new indicator for the social-ecological resilience of coastal systems and sustainable management
    Wu, Wenting
    Gao, Yiwei
    Chen, Chunpeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 435
  • [4] Sustainable Forest Management and Social-Ecological Systems: An Institutional Analysis of Caatinga, Brazil
    Faggin, Joana Mattei
    Behagel, Jelle Hendrik
    Arts, Bas
    [J]. FORESTS, 2017, 8 (11):
  • [5] Incorporating multilevel values into the social-ecological systems framework
    van Riper, Carena J.
    Thiel, Andreas
    Penker, Marianne
    Braito, Michael
    Landon, Adam C.
    Thomsen, Jennifer M.
    Tucker, Catherine M.
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (03):
  • [6] Woody encroachment: social-ecological impacts and sustainable management
    Ding, Jingyi
    Eldridge, David J.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2024,
  • [7] Agricultural biodiversity, social-ecological systems and sustainable diets
    Allen, Thomas
    Prosperi, Paolo
    Cogill, Bruce
    Flichman, Guillermo
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2014, 73 (04) : 498 - 508
  • [8] Exploring Foundations and Value Boundaries in Social-Ecological Systems
    Perkins, Skyler
    [J]. SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2017, 34 (05) : 637 - 642
  • [9] A social-ecological systems approach for environmental management
    Virapongse, Arika
    Brooks, Samantha
    Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli
    Zedalis, Morgan
    Gosz, Jim
    Kliskey, Andrew
    Alessa, Lilian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 178 : 83 - 91
  • [10] Multiscale adaptive management of social-ecological systems
    Garmestani, Ahjond
    Allen, Craig R.
    Angeler, David G.
    Gunderson, Lance
    Ruhl, J. B.
    [J]. BIOSCIENCE, 2023, 73 (11) : 800 - 807