Inference for proportional hazard model with propensity score

被引:3
|
作者
Lu, Bo [1 ]
Cai, Dingjiao [2 ]
Wang, Luheng [2 ]
Tong, Xingwei [3 ]
Xiang, Huiyun [4 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Div Biostat, Coll Publ Hlth, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Math Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Ohio State Univ, Coll Med, Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Ctr Pediat Trauma Res, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Partial likelihood; propensity score; proportional hazard model; robust inference; REGRESSION-MODELS; CENSORED-DATA; SURVIVAL; TESTS;
D O I
10.1080/03610926.2017.1343849
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Since the publication of the seminal paper by Cox (1972), proportional hazard model has become very popular in regression analysis for right censored data. In observational studies, treatment assignment may depend on observed covariates. If these confounding variables are not accounted for properly, the inference based on the Cox proportional hazard model may perform poorly. As shown in Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), under the strongly ignorable treatment assignment assumption, conditioning on the propensity score yields valid causal effect estimates. Therefore we incorporate the propensity score into the Cox model for causal inference with survival data. We derive the asymptotic property of the maximum partial likelihood estimator when the model is correctly specified. Simulation results show that our method performs quite well for observational data. The approach is applied to a real dataset on the time of readmission of trauma patients. We also derive the asymptotic property of the maximum partial likelihood estimator with a robust variance estimator, when the model is incorrectly specified.
引用
收藏
页码:2908 / 2918
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exact Inference in the Proportional Hazard Model: Possibilities and Limitations
    Sven Ove Samuelsen
    Lifetime Data Analysis, 2003, 9 : 239 - 260
  • [2] Exact inference in the proportional hazard model: Possibilities and limitations
    Samuelsen, SO
    LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2003, 9 (03) : 239 - 260
  • [3] Properties and Inference for Proportional Hazard Models
    Martinez-Florez, Guillermo
    Moreno-Arenas, German
    Vergara-Cardozo, Sandra
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE ESTADISTICA, 2013, 36 (01): : 95 - 114
  • [4] Propensity score matching and proportional hazard models: Which is best to understand heart retransplantation outcomes?
    Tumin, Dmitry
    Nandi, Deipanjan
    Hayes, Don, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (03): : 284 - 284
  • [5] Statistical inference under imputation for proportional hazard model with missing covariates
    Qiu, Zhiping
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2017, 46 (23) : 11575 - 11590
  • [6] Bivariate Proportional Hazard Models: Structure and Inference
    Arnold, Barry C.
    Martinez-Florez, Guillermo
    Gomez, Hector W.
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (10):
  • [7] Propensity score matching and proportional hazard models: Which is best to understand heart retransplantation outcomes? In Reply
    Miller, Robert J. H.
    Khush, Kiran K.
    Haddad, Francois
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (03): : 285 - 286
  • [8] Impact of glaucoma medications on subsequent Schlemm's canal surgery outcome: Cox proportional hazard model and propensity score-matched analysis
    Okuda-Arai, Mina
    Mori, Sotaro
    Takano, Fumio
    Ueda, Kaori
    Sakamoto, Mari
    Yamada-Nakanishi, Yuko
    Nakamura, Makoto
    ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2024, 102 (02) : E178 - E184
  • [9] Parametric inference from system lifetime data under a proportional hazard rate model
    Ng, Hon Keung Tony
    Navarro, Jorge
    Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy
    METRIKA, 2012, 75 (03) : 367 - 388
  • [10] Parametric inference from system lifetime data under a proportional hazard rate model
    Hon Keung Tony Ng
    Jorge Navarro
    Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan
    Metrika, 2012, 75 : 367 - 388