Constitutional Interpretation in Lawmaking: China's Invisible Constitutional Enforcement Mechanism

被引:15
|
作者
Lin, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Ginsburg, Tom [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, KoGuan Law Sch, Law, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, KoGuan Law Sch, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chicago, Law Sch, Law, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Law School, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW | 2015年 / 63卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.5131/AJCL.2015.0013
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
It is conventional wisdom that China's Constitution is unenforceable and plays little role in China's legal system, other than as a symbolic document. This view rests on the fact that the Supreme Court has no power to interpret the Constitution. The formal body with interpretive power, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, has never issued an official interpretation. Despite this apparent lack of enforcement, we argue that China's Constitution indeed plays an increasingly important coordinating role within the party-state. It does so not through the courts but through the legislative process, in which formal requirements of constitutional review have helped the legislature to resolve complex disputes about the relationships among different government organs, the economic system, and even rights claims. Understanding this hidden mechanism contributes to our knowledge of the internal constitutional workings of authoritarian systems, which differ from those of liberal democracies. It is also consistent with broader literatures on the constitution outside the courts, in which internal legislative processes have received relatively little scrutiny.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 492
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条