Early Active Motion Versus Sling Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:51
|
作者
Sheps, David M. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Silveira, Anelise [2 ]
Beaupre, Lauren [2 ,3 ]
Styles-Tripp, Fiona [4 ]
Balyk, Robert [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Lalani, Aleem [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Glasgow, Robert [1 ,2 ]
Bergman, Joseph [2 ,5 ]
Bouliane, Martin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Glen Sather Sports Med Clin, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Div Orthoped Surg, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Phys Therapy, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] Grey Nuns Hosp, Div Orthoped Surg, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Sturgeon Community Hosp, Div Orthoped Surg, St Albert, AB, Canada
关键词
EARLY PASSIVE MOTION; GENERAL-POPULATION; SHOULDER; REHABILITATION; PREVALENCE; RANGE; STIFFNESS; EXERCISE; TENDON; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.139
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To compare the effect of early mobilization (EM) with standard rehabilitation (SR) over the initial 24 months following arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair. Methods: A total of 206 patients with full-thickness RC tears undergoing arthroscopic repair were randomized following preoperative assessment of shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain, strength, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) to either EM (n = 103; self-weaned from sling and performed pain-free active ROM during the first 6 weeks) or SR (n = 103; wore a sling for 6 weeks with no active ROM). Shoulder ROM, pain, and HRQOL were reassessed at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively by a blinded assessor. At 6, 12, and 24 months, strength was reassessed. At 12 months, ultrasound verified RC integrity. Independent t tests assessed 6-week group differences and 2-way repeated measures analysis of variance assessed changes over time between groups. Results: The groups were similar preoperatively (P > .12). The mean age of participants was 55.9 (minimum, 26; maximum, 79) years, and 131 (64%) were men. A total of 171 (83%) patients were followed to 24 months. At 6 weeks postoperatively, EM participants had significantly better forward flexion and abduction (P < .03) than the SR participants; no other group differences were noted. Over 24 months, there were no group differences in ROM after 6 weeks (P > .08), and pain (P > .06), strength (P = .35), or HRQOL (P > .20) at any time. Fifty-two (25%) subjects (30% EM; 33% SR) had a full-thickness tear present at 12-month postoperative ultrasound testing (P > .8). Conclusions: EM did not show significant clinical benefits, but there was no compromise of postoperative ROM, pain, strength, or HRQOL. Repair integrity was similar at 12 months postoperatively between groups. Consideration should be given to allow pain-free active ROM within the first 6 weeks following arthroscopic RC repair.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early Passive Motion Versus Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Riboh, Jonathan C.
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (08): : 997 - 1005
  • [2] Rehabilitation Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair A Prospective Randomized Trial of Immobilization Compared with Early Motion
    Keener, Jay D.
    Galatz, Leesa M.
    Stobbs-Cucchi, Georgia
    Patton, Rebecca
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (01): : 11 - 19
  • [3] Error in the Article "Early Passive Motion Versus Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair" Reply
    Riboh, Jonathan C.
    Garrigues, Grant E.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (10): : 1218 - 1219
  • [4] Early motion versus immobilization for arthroscopic repair in the treatment of large size rotator cuff tears
    Zhang, Jian-lin
    Bai, Dong-yu
    Yang, Jiang-wei
    Luan, Yan-jun
    Zhao, Cheng-jin
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (15): : 6818 - 6822
  • [5] Rehabilitation protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: early versus delayed motion
    Chen, Long
    Peng, Kun
    Zhang, Dagang
    Peng, Jing
    Xing, Fei
    Xiang, Zhou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (06): : 8329 - 8338
  • [6] Early versus delayed active range of motion after rotator cuff repair
    Kluczynski, Melissa A.
    Bisson, Leslie J.
    MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2019, 70 (02) : 91 - 94
  • [7] Delayed versus early motion after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis
    Chan, Kevin
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    Hoppe, Daniel J.
    Ayeni, Olufemi R.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Foote, Clary J.
    Athwal, George S.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (11) : 1631 - 1639
  • [8] Early active rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized pilot study
    Raschhofer, Rudolf
    Poulios, Nikos
    Schimetta, Wolfgang
    Kisling, Rudiger
    Mittermaier, Christian
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 31 (10) : 1332 - 1339
  • [9] Intraoperative Channeling in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lapner, Peter
    Bouliane, Martin
    Pollock, J. W.
    Coupal, Stephanie
    Sabri, Elham
    Hodgdon, Taryn
    Old, Jason
    Mcilquham, Katie
    MacDonald, Peter
    CSES Investigators
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (02): : 323 - 330
  • [10] Sling Versus Abduction Brace Shoulder Immobilization After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Gao, Jing-Hui
    Zhou, Jing-Yi
    Li, Hong
    Li, Hong-Yun
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (08)