Hybrid Compensatory-Noncompensatory Choice Sets in Semicompensatory Models

被引:5
|
作者
Kaplan, Sigal [1 ]
Bekhor, Shlomo [2 ]
Shiftan, Yoram [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Transport, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[2] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, IL-32000 Haifa, Israel
关键词
INFORMATION SEARCH; ATTRIBUTE; THRESHOLDS;
D O I
10.3141/2322-02
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Semicompensatory models represent a choice process consisting of an elimination-based choice set formation on satisfaction of criterion thresholds and a utility-based choice. Current semicompensatory models assume a purely noncompensatory choice set formation and therefore do not support multinomial criteria that involve trade-offs between attributes at the choice set formation stage. This study proposes a novel behavioral paradigm consisting of a hybrid compensatory noncompensatory choice set formation process, followed by compensatory choice. The behavioral paradigm is represented by a mathematical model that combines multinomial-response and ordered-response thresholds with a utility-based choice. The proposed model is applied to a stated preference experiment of off-campus rental apartment choices by students. Results demonstrate the applicability and feasibility of incorporating multinomial-response thresholds into semicompensatory models.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 19
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPENSATORY CHOICE MODELS OF NONCOMPENSATORY PROCESSES - THE EFFECT OF VARYING CONTEXT
    JOHNSON, EJ
    MEYER, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1984, 11 (01) : 528 - 541
  • [2] Noncompensatory consideration and compensatory choice: an application to Stackelberg competition
    Mauro Papi
    [J]. Economic Theory Bulletin, 2014, 2 (1) : 53 - 63
  • [3] Neural Mechanisms Underlying Compensatory and Noncompensatory Strategies in Risky Choice
    Van Duijvenvoorde, Anna C. K.
    Figner, Bernd
    Weeda, Wouter D.
    Van der Molen, Maurits W.
    Jansen, Brenda R. J.
    Huizenga, Hilde M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 28 (09) : 1358 - 1373
  • [4] Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences
    Dieckmann, Anja
    Dippold, Katrin
    Dietrich, Holger
    [J]. JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2009, 4 (03): : 200 - 213
  • [5] THE ROLE OF PROCESSING-BY-ATTRIBUTE NONCOMPENSATORY CHOICE MODELS
    JAVALGI, RG
    GENSCH, DH
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1987, 8 : 203 - 206
  • [6] Two-Stage Model for Jointly Revealing Determinants of Noncompensatory Conjunctive Choice Set Formation and Compensatory Choice
    Kaplan, Sigal
    Bekhor, Shlomo
    Shiftan, Yoram
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2009, (2134) : 153 - 163
  • [7] A comparison of compensatory and noncompensatory models of judgment: Effects of task predictability and degrees of freedom
    Schneider, LG
    Selling, TI
    [J]. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1996, 21 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [8] MEASURES OF COMPENSATORY AND NONCOMPENSATORY MODELS OF DECISION BEHAVIOR - PROCESS TRACING VERSUS POLICY CAPTURING
    BILLINGS, RS
    MARCUS, SA
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1983, 31 (03): : 331 - 352
  • [9] The Recovery of Correlation Between Latent Abilities Using Compensatory and Noncompensatory Multidimensional IRT Models
    Fu, Yanyan
    Strachan, Tyler
    Ip, Edward H.
    Willse, John T.
    Chen, Shyh-Huei
    Ackerman, Terry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2020, 20 (02) : 169 - 186
  • [10] MATHEMATICAL-MODELS OF FOREIGN-POLICY DECISION-MAKING - COMPENSATORY VS NONCOMPENSATORY
    MINTZ, A
    GEVA, N
    DEROUEN, K
    [J]. SYNTHESE, 1994, 100 (03) : 441 - 460