Comparative analysis of energy intensity and carbon emissions in wastewater treatment in USA, Germany, China and South Africa

被引:180
|
作者
Wang, Hongtao [1 ]
Yang, Yi [2 ]
Keller, Arturo A. [3 ]
Li, Xiang [1 ]
Feng, Shijin [4 ]
Dong, Ya-nan [1 ]
Li, Fengting [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, State Key Lab Pollut Control & Resource Reuse, Key Lab Yangtze River Water Environm,Minist Educ, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] CSRA Inc, 3170 Fairview Pk Dr, Falls Church, VA 22042 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[4] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon neutrality; Greenhouse gas emission; Wastewater treatment plant; Energy efficiency; Energy harvesting; MICROBIAL FUEL-CELLS; TREATMENT PLANTS; CO-DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SLUDGE-DIGESTION; MUNICIPAL; ELECTRICITY; GENERATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.061
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Currently almost all wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) require a large amount of energy input to process the influent, mostly as electricity, and the associated carbon emissions are in aggregate significant. In order to achieve carbon neutrality, it is important to understand direct and indirect carbon emissions generated by WWTPs. Here, we focused on electricity use in WWTPs as it is a major source of carbon emissions. Specifically, we compared the electricity intensity and associated carbon emissions of WWTPs in four countries: the USA, Germany, China, and South Africa. We found that 100% energy self-sufficient WWTPs are feasible by a combination of increased energy efficiency and energy harvesting from the wastewater. Carbon emissions of WWTPs depend strongly on the electricity fuel mix, wastewater treatment technologies, treatment capacity, and influent and effluent water quality. A few WWTPs operating in developed countries (USA and Germany) have already achieved almost 100% (or higher) electricity self-sufficiency through energy efficiency and harvesting biogas and electricity. In comparison with Germany, WWTPs in the USA are more heterogeneous and the range of unit carbon emission intensity is much wider. In some areas where the organic content in wastewater is lower and less biogas is produced, it is still possible to achieve energy self-sufficiency by using thermal energy from wastewater. Industrial wastewater in China in general consumes more electricity and the carbon intensity of electricity is also higher, resulting in much higher unit carbon emissions as compared with other countries. In megacities such as Shanghai, larger capacity of centralized WWTPs can decrease the unit carbon emissions significantly. These findings provide a global perspective on the state of WWTPs and are helpful to improve the understanding, designing and operating of WWTPs from the perspective of achieving carbon neutrality. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 881
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Carbon and energy intensity of the USA and Germany. A LMDI decomposition approach and decoupling analysis
    Eleni Koilakou
    Emmanouil Hatzigeorgiou
    Kostas Bithas
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 (5) : 12412 - 12427
  • [2] Carbon and energy intensity of the USA and Germany. A LMDI decomposition approach and decoupling analysis
    Koilakou, Eleni
    Hatzigeorgiou, Emmanouil
    Bithas, Kostas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (05) : 12412 - 12427
  • [3] Energy efficiency to mitigate carbon emissions: strategies of China and the USA
    Ming Yang
    Xin Yu
    [J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2017, 22 : 1 - 14
  • [4] Energy efficiency to mitigate carbon emissions: strategies of China and the USA
    Yang, Ming
    Yu, Xin
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2017, 22 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [5] A comparative analysis of the application of Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies in the energy sector: A case study of South Africa, Germany and China
    Bhagwan, N.
    Evansl, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY IN SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2022, 33 (02) : 1 - 14
  • [6] Implications of Energy Intensity Ratio for Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China
    Chen, Jiabin
    Wen, Shaobo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
  • [7] Economic Growth, Energy Intensity, and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in China
    Naminse, Eric Yaw
    Zhuang, Jincai
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2018, 27 (05): : 2193 - 2201
  • [8] A greenhouse gas emissions inventory for South Africa: A comparative analysis
    Seymore, R.
    Inglesi-Lotz, R.
    Blignaut, J.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 34 : 371 - 379
  • [9] History education for nation-building in Ethiopia, Germany, Rwanda, South Africa, Switzerland, and USA: A comparative analysis
    Awgichew, Sisay
    Ademe, Enguday
    [J]. COGENT EDUCATION, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [10] Energy intensity of wastewater treatment plants and influencing factors in China
    Niu, Kunyu
    Wu, Jian
    Qi, Lu
    Niu, Qianxin
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 670 : 961 - 970