DSM-5: the debate continues

被引:0
|
作者
Buxbaum, Joseph D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Baron-Cohen, Simon [4 ]
机构
[1] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Friedman Brain Inst, Seaver Autism Ctr Res & Treatment, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Friedman Brain Inst, Seaver Autism Ctr Res & Treatment, Dept Neurosci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Friedman Brain Inst, Seaver Autism Ctr Res & Treatment, Dept Genet & Genom Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[4] Univ Cambridge, Autism Res Ctr, Cambridge CB2 8AH, England
来源
MOLECULAR AUTISM | 2013年 / 4卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/2040-2392-4-11
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
We are fortunate to have invited commentaries from the laboratories of Dr Cathy Lord and Dr Fred Volkmar offering their perspectives on the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 criteria for the autism spectrum. Both commentaries note how DSM-5 collapses the earlier diagnostic categories of the pervasive developmental disorders into a single category of autism spectrum disorder. In addition, DSM-5 collapses social and communication domains into a single combined domain. The commentaries go on to discuss the positive aspects of these changes and raise some areas of potential concern. We support the evidence-based changes to autism diagnosis found in DSM-5, and look forward to further studies on the autism phenotype as this has implications for diagnosis and treatment. As our mechanistic understanding of autism improves, diagnoses based on behavioral parameters will continue to provide opportunities for interventions targeting the behaviors, while etiological diagnoses will provide opportunities for interventions tailored to etiology.
引用
收藏
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DSM-5: the debate continues
    Joseph D Buxbaum
    Simon Baron-Cohen
    [J]. Molecular Autism, 4
  • [2] Debate on DSM-5: a false dichotomy?
    Green, Huw
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGIST, 2013, 26 (06) : 382 - 383
  • [3] Tools for Teaching, Room for Debate: The DSM-5
    Usher, Craigan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 57 (03): : 212 - 212
  • [4] The Bereavement Exclusion Debate in the DSM-5: A History
    Zachar, Peter
    First, Michael B.
    Kendler, Kenneth S.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 5 (05) : 890 - 906
  • [5] DSM-5 DEBATE: SHOULD INTERNET GAMING DISORDER BE INCLUDED IN THE DSM?
    Ali, M.
    Le, H. K.
    Tam, P.
    Dullur, P.
    Starcevic, V.
    Juredini, J.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 51 : 93 - 94
  • [6] The Parental Alienation Debate Belongs in the Courtroom, Not in DSM-5
    Houchin, Timothy M.
    Ranseen, John
    Hash, Phillip A. K.
    Bartnicki, Daniel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PSYCHIATRY AND THE LAW, 2012, 40 (01): : 127 - 131
  • [7] Values and DSM-5: looking at the debate on attenuated psychosis syndrome
    Arthur Maciel Nunes Gonçalves
    Clarissa de Rosalmeida Dantas
    Claudio E. M. Banzato
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 17
  • [8] Values and DSM-5: looking at the debate on attenuated psychosis syndrome
    Nunes Goncalves, Arthur Maciel
    Dantas, Clarissa de Rosalmeida
    Banzato, Claudio E. M.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2016, 17
  • [9] The problem with the DSM-5 is the DSM not the 5
    Carey, Timothy
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 21 (04) : 409 - 409
  • [10] DSM-5 in Action
    d'Antonio, Andrea Castiello
    [J]. PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE, 2019, 53 (02) : 349 - 350