Chemical looping for pre-combustion and post-combustion CO2 capture

被引:17
|
作者
Mantripragada, Hari C. [1 ]
Rubin, Edward S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Engn & Publ Policy, BH129, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Chemical looping; calcium looping; performance and cost; efficiency;
D O I
10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1776
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the paper, performance models are developed for two CO2 capture technologies - (a) a chemical looping combustion (CLC) process for pre-combustion CO2 capture from the syngas of a coal-based integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant; and (b) a CaL cycle for post-combustion CO2 capture from a pulverized coal (PC) power plant - and used to conduct detailed thermodynamic analyses of IGCC and PC power plants with the respective chemical looping-based CO2 capture processes. Results from the performance models are used to estimate the capital cost ($/kW) and operating cost ($/MWh) of each capture process as well as the complete power plant. Results of the case studies using the techno-economic model indicate that, in terms of performance, both of the chemical looping technologies modelled here are thermodynamically much better than conventional CO2 capture technologies, resulting in lower overall plant energy penalties. However, both the technologies are found to be more capital-intensive. As a result, the overall cost (capital and LCOE) of plants with chemical looping CO2 capture technologies is greater than or similar to the conventional technologies. (c) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:6403 / 6410
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture
    Kanniche, Mohamed
    Gros-Bonnivard, Rene
    Jaud, Philippe
    Valle-Marcos, Jose
    Amann, Jean-Marc
    Bouallou, Chakib
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2010, 30 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [2] Chemical Looping for Pre-combustion CO2 Capture - Performance and Cost Analysis
    Mantripragada, Hari C.
    Rubin, Edward S.
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 618 - 625
  • [3] Solid sorbents for CO2 capture from post-combustion and pre-combustion gas streams
    Siriwardane, Ranjani V.
    Robinson, Clark
    Stevens, Robert W., Jr.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 233
  • [4] Pre-combustion CO2 capture
    Jansen, Daniel
    Gazzani, Matteo
    Manzolini, Giampaolo
    van Dijk, Eric
    Carbo, Michiel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 40 : 167 - 187
  • [5] Benchmarking of the pre/post-combustion chemical absorption for the CO2 capture
    Dinca, Cristian
    Slavu, Nela
    Badea, Adrian
    JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2018, 91 (03) : 445 - 456
  • [6] A Comparative of Life Cycle Assessment of Post-Combustion, Pre-Combustion and Oxy-fuel CO2 capture
    Zhou, Q.
    Koiwanit, J.
    Piewkhaow, L.
    Manuilova, A.
    Chan, C. W.
    Wilson, M.
    Tontiwachwuthikul, P.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12, 2014, 63 : 7452 - 7458
  • [7] Pre-combustion/post-combustion decarbonisation
    Kaiser, T
    2000 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY SUMMER MEETING, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-4, 2000, : 1779 - 1779
  • [8] Energy and exergy analysis of chemical looping combustion technology and comparison with pre-combustion and oxy-fuel combustion technologies for CO2 capture
    Mukherjee, Sanjay
    Kumar, Prashant
    Yang, Aidong
    Fennell, Paul
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 3 (03): : 2104 - 2114
  • [9] CO2 CAPTURE BY CHEMICAL LOOPING COMBUSTION
    Forernl, Carmen R.
    Adanez, Juan
    Gayan, Pilar
    de Diego, Luis F.
    Garcia-Labiano, Francisco
    Abad, Alberto
    REVISTA COLOMBIANA DE QUIMICA, 2010, 39 (02): : 271 - 285
  • [10] Performance of Coriolis flowmeters in CO2 pipelines with pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel gas mixtures in carbon capture and storage
    Nazeri, Mahmoud
    Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes
    Jukes, Edward
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 54 : 297 - 308