共 2 条
HAPPE-A pilot programme using humanities to teach junior doctors empathy in a palliative medicine posting
被引:1
|作者:
Ong, Eng Koon
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Support & Palliat Care, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Assisi Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Support & Palliat Care, 11 Hosp Dr, Singapore 169610, Singapore
来源:
关键词:
Empathy;
Humanities;
Literature;
Palliative Medicine;
INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT;
OF-LIFE CARE;
STANDARDIZED FAMILY-MEMBERS;
SHARED DECISION-MAKING;
COMMUNICATION-SKILLS;
EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION;
NAVIGATING COMMUNICATION;
IMPROVING COMMUNICATION;
PATIENT COMMUNICATION;
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;
D O I:
10.29060/TAPS.2021-6-1/OA2251
中图分类号:
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号:
040101 ;
120403 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Physician empathy is declining due to an unproportionate focus on technical knowledge and skills. The medical humanities can counter this by allowing connection with our patients. This is a pilot study that aims to investigate the acceptability, efficacy, and feasibility of a humanities educational intervention to develop physician empathy.Methods: Junior doctors at the Division of Supportive and Palliative Care at the National Cancer Centre Singapore between July 2018 and June 2019 attended two small-group sessions facilitated by psychologists to learn about empathy using literature and other arts-based materials. Feasibility was defined as a completion rate of at least 80% while acceptability was assessed by a 5question Likert-scale questionnaire. Empathy was measured pre- and post-intervention using Jefferson's Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE) and the modified-CARE (Consultation and Relational Empathy) measure.Results: Seventeen participants consented, and all completed the programme. Acceptability scores ranged from 18 to 50 out of 50 (mean 38, median 38). There was an increase in JSPE scores (pre-test mean 103.6, SD=11.0 and post-test mean 108.9, SD=9.9; t (17) =2.49, P=.02). The modified-CARE score increased between pre-test mean of 22.9(SD=5.8) and a post-test mean ofConclusion: Results indicate that the programme was acceptable, effective, and feasible. The results are limited by the lack of longitudinal follow-up. Future studies that investigate the programme's effect over time and qualitative analysis can better assess its efficacy and elicit the participants' experiences for future implementation and refinement.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 92
页数:10
相关论文