Functional status as a predictor of outcomes in open and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

被引:15
|
作者
Endicott, Kendal M. [1 ]
Emerson, Dominic [1 ]
Amdur, Richard [1 ]
Macsata, Robyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington DC Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Div Vasc Surg, Washington, DC USA
关键词
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; VASCULAR-SURGERY; 30-DAY MORTALITY; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; FRAILTY; MORBIDITY; NSQIP; OLDER; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.079
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Functional status is a simple and rapidly assessable metric that may be used as a predictor for surgical outcomes. This study examined the association of functional status with short-term mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in octogenarians to characterize the utility of functional status as a means of preoperative risk assessment. Methods: All patients who underwent endovascular and open AAA repair from 2002 to 2010 within the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP) database were identified. Functional status, defined as an ordinal scale from 1 to 3 (1, independent; 2, partially dependent; 3, totally dependent), was examined using multivariate regression models with 30-day mortality as the primary outcome. For the purpose of analysis, this 3-point scale was converted into a binomial scale of function, with "normal" including 1 (completely independent) and "abnormal" including 2 or 3 (partially to totally dependent). Results: We identified 9030 patients who underwent AAA repair (46.6% open and 53.4% endovascular). Mortality at 30 days was 2.8% for the entire cohort (4.2% open, 1.7% endovascular; P <.001). There were 1340 patients aged >= 80 years, of which 67.3% underwent endovascular AAA repair. Among all age groups, functional status was a significant predictor of 30-day mortality (< 80 years, P <.001; >= 80 years, P <.001). The >= 80 cohort with abnormal function status also demonstrated increased operative mortality (P = .002), length of stay (P = .001), and incidence of pulmonary complications (P = .025) compared with the cohort with normal functional status. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that within the >= 80-year-old cohort, only functional status remained a significant predictor of mortality (P <.001). In addition, the strength of the association between functional status and mortality was greater in the older cohort than in the younger one (Cox regression hazard ratio: 3.13 vs 2.18). Conclusions: Functional status is a simple and rapidly applicable predictor of mortality within AAA patients and may be a useful tool to help preoperatively risk-stratify elderly patients presenting with AAA in need of repair. Further studies are needed to understand how best to apply these data to the clinical setting to guide preoperative decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 45
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Functional Status as a Predictor of Mortality in Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Octogenarians
    Emerson, Dominic
    Amdur, Richard
    Macsata, Robyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 59 (06) : 46S - 46S
  • [2] Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Schmitz-Rixen, Thomas
    Boeckler, Dittmar
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Grundmann, Reinhart T.
    [J]. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 117 (48): : 813 - 819
  • [3] Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in the Era of Endovascular Repair
    Leake, P-A
    Hamilton-Johnson, T. N.
    Harry, M.
    Gordon-Strachan, G. M.
    Plummer, J. M.
    Newnham, M. S.
    [J]. WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 60 (06): : 636 - 640
  • [4] Endovascular or open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm?
    Bjorck, Martin
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 359
  • [5] Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Lederle, Frank A.
    Kyriakides, Tassos C.
    Stroupe, Kevin T.
    Freischlag, Julie A.
    Padberg, Frank T., Jr.
    Matsumura, Jon S.
    Huo, Zhiping
    Johnson, Gary R.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (22): : 2126 - 2135
  • [6] Comparing Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Dalainas, Ilias
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (06): : 513 - 513
  • [7] Abdominal aortic aneurysm - Open versus endovascular repair
    Lederle, FA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (16): : 1677 - 1679
  • [8] Contemporary Outcomes following Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Gupta, Prateek K.
    Natarajan, Bala
    Gupta, Himani
    Fang, Xiang
    Balters, Marcus
    Johanning, Jason M.
    Lynch, Thomas G.
    Forse, R. Armour
    Longo, G. Matthew
    MacTaggart, Jason
    Pipinos, Iraklis I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 : 33S - 34S
  • [9] Outcomes of emergency endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture
    Choo, Suk Jung
    Jeon, Yang-Bin
    Oh, Sam-Sae
    Shinn, Sung Ho
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 100 (05) : 291 - 297
  • [10] Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Greenhalgh, Roger M.
    Brown, Louise C.
    Powell, Janet T.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Epstein, David
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (20): : 1863 - 1871