The impact of data transformations on concentration-response modeling

被引:25
|
作者
Weimer, Marc [1 ]
Jiang, Xiaoqi [1 ]
Ponta, Oriana [1 ]
Stanzel, Sven [1 ]
Freyberger, Alexius [2 ]
Kopp-Schneider, Annette [1 ]
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Dept Biostat, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Bayer Pharma AG, GGD GED Toxicol, Dept Pathol & Clin Pathol, D-42096 Wuppertal, Germany
关键词
Concentration-response data; Log-logistic model; EC50; estimation; Background correction; Data normalization; BINDING ASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.07.012
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Concentration-response studies are performed to investigate the potency of the substance under investigation. Data are typically evaluated using non-linear regression. A common model is the log-logistic model which includes parameters for lower and upper boundary of mean response, EC50 and Hill slope. Often, response and/or concentration data are transformed before proceeding with the analysis of their relationship. This is motivated by practical reasons, including comparability of results across different assays. We prove mathematically that a linear transformation of data will not change the EC50 and Hill slope estimates and only results in an identical transformation of the estimated parameters for lower and upper boundary of mean response. However, fixing some of the parameters may lead to erroneous estimates. This is of practical relevance when data are corrected for background signal and normalized by background corrected solvent control and a reduced model is used in which the response range is fixed between 100% and 0%. Computer simulations and a real data example are used to illustrate the impact of data transformations on parameter estimation. We further shed light on some common problems arising in the analysis of concentration-response data. Recommendations for practical implementation in concentration-response analysis are provided. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cumulative concentration-response curves: new modeling tool
    Thorin, C.
    Mallem, M. Y.
    Kabbesh, N.
    Desfontis, J. -C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 35 : 165 - 166
  • [2] Characterizing and modeling concentration-response curves of olfactory receptor cells
    Rospars, JP
    Lánsky, P
    Duchamp-Viret, P
    Duchamp, A
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2001, 38 : 319 - 325
  • [3] Characterizing and modeling concentration-response curves of olfactory receptor cells
    Rospars, Jean-Pierre
    Lánský, Petr
    Duchamp-Viret, Patricia
    Duchamp, André
    [J]. 1600, Elsevier (38-40):
  • [4] A Spatial Model of Air Pollution: The Impact of the Concentration-Response Function
    Goodkind, Andrew L.
    Coggins, Jay S.
    Marshall, Julian D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2014, 1 (04) : 451 - 479
  • [6] COMPUTER-ASSISTED ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX CONCENTRATION-RESPONSE DATA
    MCPHERSON, GA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL METHODS, 1985, 13 (02): : 125 - 134
  • [7] bayesnec: : An R Package for Concentration-Response Modeling and Estimation of Toxicity Metrics
    Fisher, Rebecca
    Ricardo, Gerard F.
    Barneche, Diego R.
    Fox, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2024, 110 (05): : 1 - 41
  • [8] CIMETIDINE PLASMA CONCENTRATION-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIPS
    GUGLER, R
    FUCHS, G
    DIECKMANN, M
    SOMOGYI, AA
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1981, 29 (06) : 744 - 748
  • [9] DIAZOXIDE CONCENTRATION-RESPONSE RELATION IN HYPERTENSION
    OGILVIE, RI
    NADEAU, JH
    SITAR, DS
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 1982, 4 (01) : 167 - 173
  • [10] Role of Concentration-Response Modeling with Phase I Data in Evaluating QT Interval Prolongation: Results with Ten Compounds
    Huh, Yeamin
    Byon, Wonkyung
    Riley, Steve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2013, 40 : S65 - S65