Redox regulation of mitochondrial sulfide oxidation in the lugworm, Arenicola marina

被引:35
|
作者
Hildebrandt, Tatjana M. [1 ]
Grieshaber, Manfred K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dusseldorf, Inst Zoophysiol, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY | 2008年 / 211卷 / 16期
关键词
redox regulation; sulfide oxidation; Arenicola marina; alternative oxidase; ATP production; glutathione; ascorbate; dehydroascorbate;
D O I
10.1242/jeb.019729
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sulfide oxidation in the lugworm, Arenicola marina (L.), is most likely localized in the mitochondria, which can either produce ATP with sulfide as a substrate or detoxify it via an alternative oxidase. The present study identified selective activators of the energy-conserving and the detoxifying sulfide oxidation pathways respectively. In the presence of the ROS scavengers glutathione (GSH) and ascorbate, isolated lugworm mitochondria rapidly oxidized up to 100 mu mol l(-1) sulfide with maximal oxygen consumption rates but did not produce any ATP in the process. Under these conditions, salicylhydroxamic acid (SHAM), which is an inhibitor of the alternative oxidase of plant mitochondria, completely blocked oxygen consumption whereas inhibitors of complex III and IV had hardly any effect. By contrast, dehydroascorbate (DHA) enabled the mitochondria to gain ATP from sulfide oxidation even if the sulfide concentration far exceeded the threshold for inhibition of cytochrome oxidase. In the presence of dehydroascorbate, respiratory rates were independent of sulfide concentrations, with a respiratory control ratio of 2.1 +/- 0.2, and both oxygen consumption and ATP production were completely inhibited by myxothiazol and sodium azide but only marginally by SHAM. The present data indicate that a redox mechanism may contribute to the regulation of sulfide oxidation in lugworm mitochondria in vivo. Thus, mitochondria are presumably much more sulfide resistant in a cellular context than previously thought.
引用
收藏
页码:2617 / 2623
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TOLERANCE OF THE LUGWORM (ARENICOLA-MARINA) TO SULFIDE
    GROENENDAAL, M
    [J]. NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 1980, 14 (02): : 200 - 207
  • [2] OXYGEN-DEPENDENT SULFIDE DETOXIFICATION IN THE LUGWORM ARENICOLA-MARINA
    VOLKEL, S
    GRIESHABER, MK
    [J]. MARINE BIOLOGY, 1994, 118 (01) : 137 - 147
  • [3] Effects of cadmium exposure on volume regulation in the lugworm, Arenicola marina
    Rasmussen, AD
    Andersen, O
    [J]. AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY, 2000, 48 (2-3) : 151 - 164
  • [4] Sulphide oxidation and oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria of the lugworm Arenicola marina
    Volkel, S
    Grieshaber, MK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1997, 200 (01): : 83 - 92
  • [5] Mitochondrial sulfide oxidation in Arenicola marina - Evidence for alternative electron pathways
    Volkel, S
    Grieshaber, MK
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 235 (1-2): : 231 - 237
  • [6] SULFIDE STRESS AND TOLERANCE IN THE LUGWORM ARENICOLA-MARINA DURING LOW TIDE
    VOLKEL, S
    HAUSCHILD, K
    GRIESHABER, MK
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1995, 122 (1-3) : 205 - 215
  • [7] Bioelectrical activity in the heart of the lugworm Arenicola marina
    Abramochkin, Denis V.
    Tennova, Natalia V.
    Hirazova, Elizaveta E.
    Pizgareva, Anna V.
    Kuzmin, Vladislav S.
    Sukhova, Galina S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY B-BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 180 (05) : 645 - 651
  • [8] Acute toxicity of ivermectin to the lugworm Arenicola marina
    Thain, JE
    Davies, IM
    Rae, GH
    Allen, YT
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 1997, 159 (1-2) : 47 - 52
  • [9] Immunity of the lugworm Arenicola marina: cells and molecules
    Berlov, M. N.
    Maltseva, A. L.
    [J]. ISJ-INVERTEBRATE SURVIVAL JOURNAL, 2016, 13 : 247 - 256
  • [10] Bioelectrical activity in the heart of the lugworm Arenicola marina
    Denis V. Abramochkin
    Natalia V. Tennova
    Elizaveta E. Hirazova
    Anna V. Pizgareva
    Vladislav S. Kuzmin
    Galina S. Sukhova
    [J]. Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 2010, 180 : 645 - 651