Top-down and bottom-up factors in threat-related perception and attention in anxiety

被引:94
|
作者
Sussman, Tamara J. [1 ]
Jin, Jingwen [1 ]
Mohanty, Aprajita [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
Top-down; Endogenous; Threat perception; Prestimulus processes; Attention; Amygdala; Anxiety; Sensory cortex; Prefrontal cortex; Perceptual bias; Attentional bias; EMOTIONAL FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; COGNITIVE BIAS MODIFICATION; COVERT SPATIAL ATTENTION; PRIMARY VISUAL-CORTEX; WORKING-MEMORY; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SOCIAL ANXIETY; TRAIT ANXIETY; DIRECTED ATTENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.08.006
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Anxiety is characterized by the anticipation of aversive future events. The importance of prestimulus anticipatory factors, such as goals and expectations, is well-established in both visual perception and attention. Nevertheless, the prioritized perception of threatening stimuli in anxiety has been attributed to the automatic processing of these stimuli and the role of prestimulus factors has been neglected. The present review will focus on the role of top-down processes that occur before stimulus onset in the perceptual and attentional prioritization of threatening stimuli in anxiety. We will review both the cognitive and neuroscience literature, showing how top-down factors, and interactions between top-down and bottom-up factors may contribute to biased perception of threatening stimuli in normal function and anxiety. The shift in focus from stimulus-driven to endogenous factors and interactions between top-down and bottom-up factors in the prioritization of threat-related stimuli represents an important conceptual advance. In addition, it may yield important clues into the development and maintenance of anxiety, as well as inform novel treatments for anxiety. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 172
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bottom-up and top-down attention are independent
    Pinto, Yair
    van der Leij, Andries R.
    Sligte, Ilja G.
    Lamme, Victor A. F.
    Scholte, H. Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISION, 2013, 13 (03): : 16
  • [2] TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP CONTROL OF ATTENTION
    JOHNSTON, WA
    MALLOY, TE
    FOSS, CL
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1979, 14 (04) : 240 - 240
  • [3] Visual attention: Bottom-up versus top-down
    Connor, CE
    Egeth, HE
    Yantis, S
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (19) : R850 - R852
  • [4] A Top-Down and Bottom-Up Component of Visual Attention
    Wasserman, Gerald S.
    Bolbecker, Amanda R.
    Li, Jia
    Lim-Kessler, Corrinne C. M.
    [J]. COGNITIVE COMPUTATION, 2011, 3 (01) : 294 - 302
  • [5] Relative Influence of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention
    Mancas, Matei
    [J]. ATTENTION IN COGNITIVE SYSTEMS, 2009, 5395 : 212 - 226
  • [6] Top-down Attention Control and Bottom-up Attention Capture During Threat of Shock: An Electroencephalographic Investigation
    Russell, Bartlett A. H.
    Prosacco, Alessandro
    Hatfield, Bradley D.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2014, 46 (05): : 282 - 282
  • [7] Top-down and bottom-up factors in tidepool communities
    Methratta, ET
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MARINE BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY, 2004, 299 (01) : 77 - 96
  • [8] Computational modeling of bottom-up and top-down visual attention
    Itti, Laurent
    [J]. I-PERCEPTION, 2014, 5 (04): : 415 - 415
  • [9] Top-down and Bottom-up Regulated Auditory Phantom Perception
    Vanneste, Sven
    Alsalman, Ola
    De Ridder, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 39 (02): : 364 - 378
  • [10] Bottom-up or top-down in dream neuroscience? A top-down critique of two bottom-up studies
    Foulkes, David
    Domhoff, G. William
    [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2014, 27 : 168 - 171