Protocols for Harmonized Quantification and Noise Reduction in Low-Dose Oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging

被引:9
|
作者
Machado, Marcos A. D. [1 ,2 ]
Menezes, Vinicius O. [1 ,3 ]
Namias, Mauro [4 ]
Vieira, Naiara S. [1 ]
Queiroz, Cleiton C. [1 ,5 ]
Matheoud, Roberta [6 ]
Alessio, Adam M. [7 ]
Oliveira, Mercia L. [8 ]
机构
[1] Sao Rafael Hosp, Nucl Med Dept, Ave Sao Rafael 2152, BR-41253190 Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Bahia Ebserh, Hosp Clin, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Pernambuco Ebserh, Hosp Clin, Recife, PE, Brazil
[4] Fdn Ctr Diagnost Nucl, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[5] Hosp Univ Prof Alberto Antunes Ebserh, Maceio, Brazil
[6] Azienda Osped Maggiore Carita, Dept Med Phys, Novara, Italy
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[8] CNEN, Ctr Reg Ciencias Nucl CRCN NE, Recife, PE, Brazil
关键词
PET/CT protocols; optimization; quantification; biomarker; EARL accreditation; TIME-OF-FLIGHT; POINT-SPREAD FUNCTION; CELL LUNG-CANCER; LESION DETECTABILITY; FDG-PET; RECONSTRUCTION; ACCURACY; SUV; ACCREDITATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.2967/jnmt.118.213405
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Oncologic F-18-FDG PET/CT acquisition and reconstruction protocols need to be optimized for both quantitative and detection tasks. To date, most studies have focused on either quantification or noise, leading to quantitative harmonization guidelines or appropriate noise levels. We developed and evaluated protocols that provide harmonized quantitation with optimal amounts of noise as a function of acquisition parameters and body mass. Methods: Multiple image acquisitions (n = 17) of the International Electrotechnical Commission/National Electrical Manufacturers Association PET image-quality phantom were performed with variable counting statistics. Phantom images were reconstructed with 3-dimensional ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM3D) and point-spread function (PSF) for harmonized quantification of the contrast recovery coefficient of the maximum pixel value (CRCmax). The lowest counting statistics that resulted in compliance with European Association of Nuclear Medicine recommendations for CRCmax and CRCmax variability were used as optimization metrics. Image noise in the liver of 48 typical oncologic F-18-FDG PET/CT studies was analyzed with OSEM3D and PSF harmonized reconstructions. We also evaluated 164 additional F-18-FDG PET/CT reconstructed list-mode images to derive analytic expressions that predict image quality and noise variability. Phantom-to-subject translational analysis was used to derive optimized acquisition and reconstruction protocols. Results: For harmonized quantitation levels, PSF reconstructions yielded decreased noise and lower CRCmax variability than regular OSEM3D reconstructions, suggesting they could enable a decreased activity regimen for matched performance. Conclusion: PSF reconstruction with a 7-mm postprocessing filter can provide harmonized quantification performance and acceptable image noise levels with injected activity, duration, and mass settings using a 260 MBq.s/kg acquisition parameter at scan time. Similarly, OSEM3D with a 5-mm postprocessing filter can provide similar performance with 401 MBq.s/kg.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 54
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Matched Pair Validation of Ultra-low-dose CT Compared to Low-dose CT for Oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Hall, N. C.
    Wright, C. L.
    Gortanla, N.
    Nagar, V.
    Zhang, J.
    Knopp, M. V.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 : S322 - S322
  • [3] Reporting Guidance for Oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging
    Niederkohr, Ryan D.
    Greenspan, Bennett S.
    Prior, John O.
    Schoeder, Heiko
    Seltzer, Marc A.
    Zukotynski, Katherine A.
    Rohren, Eric M.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 54 (05) : 756 - 761
  • [4] Clinical experience of 18F-FDG-PET/CT performed with the low-dose injection of 18F-FDG
    Jinguji, M.
    Nakajo, M.
    Tani, A.
    Nagano, H.
    Matsumoto, T.
    Fujisaka, T.
    Yoshiura, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2018, 45 : S709 - S709
  • [5] The impact of infection and inflammation in oncologic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging
    Rahman, W. Tania
    Wale, Daniel J.
    Viglianti, Benjamin L.
    Townsend, Danyelle M.
    Manganaro, Matthew S.
    Gross, Milton D.
    Wong, Ka Kit
    Rubello, Domenico
    BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2019, 117
  • [7] Imaging Protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in Overweight Patients: Limitations
    Talanow, Roland
    Shrikanthan, Sankaran
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (04) : 662 - 662
  • [8] Evolution of quantification methods in oncologic 18F-FDG PET studies
    Nifierola Baizan, Aida
    Ros Puig, Domenec
    Pavia Segura, Javier
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR E IMAGEN MOLECULAR, 2018, 37 (04): : 203 - 204
  • [9] Dose evaluation to patients from different 18F-FDG PET/CT protocols
    De Ponti, Elena
    Beggio, Francesco
    Paruccini, Nicoletta
    Guerra, Luca
    Morzenti, Sabrina
    Radice, Anna
    Gusmeroli, Claudio
    Redaelli, Irene
    Crespi, Andrea
    Messa, Cristina
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [10] OPTIMISATION OF ROUTINE CLINICAL IMAGING PROTOCOLS IN 18F-FDG ONCOLOGY PET CT IMAGING
    Tout, D.
    Dolkens, J.
    Du, L.
    Richards, J.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2015, 45 : 14 - 14