Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application

被引:170
|
作者
Scheben, Armin
Batley, Jacqueline
Edwards, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Plant Biol, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
Breeding; Genomics; genotyping-by-sequencing; reduced-representation sequencing; whole-genome resequencing; MARKER-ASSISTED SELECTION; HYBRID ERROR-CORRECTION; WIDE ASSOCIATION; DE-NOVO; LINKAGE MAP; NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; AGRONOMIC TRAITS; COMPLEX TRAITS; EXOME CAPTURE; RNA-SEQ;
D O I
10.1111/pbi.12645
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In the last decade, the revolution in sequencing technologies has deeply impacted crop genotyping practice. New methods allowing rapid, high-throughput genotyping of entire crop populations have proliferated and opened the door to wider use of molecular tools in plant breeding. These new genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) methods include over a dozen reduced-representation sequencing (RRS) approaches and at least four whole-genome resequencing (WGR) approaches. The diversity of methods available, each often producing different types of data at different cost, can make selection of the best-suited method seem a daunting task. We review the most common genotyping methods used today and compare their suitability for linkage mapping, genomewide association studies (GWAS), marker-assisted and genomic selection and genome assembly and improvement in crops with various genome sizes and complexity. Furthermore, we give an outline of bioinformatics tools for analysis of genotyping data. WGR is well suited to genotyping biparental cross populations with complex, small- to moderate-sized genomes and provides the lowest cost per marker data point. RRS approaches differ in their suitability for various tasks, but demonstrate similar costs per marker data point. These approaches are generally better suited for de novo applications and more cost-effective when genotyping populations with large genomes or high heterozygosity. We expect that although RRS approaches will remain the most cost-effective for some time, WGR will become more widespread for crop genotyping as sequencing costs continue to decrease.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 161
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sequencing crop genomes: approaches and applicationsSequencing crop genomes: approaches and applications
    Jackson, Scott A.
    Iwata, Aiko
    Lee, Suk-Ha
    Schmutz, Jeremy
    Shoemaker, Randy
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2011, 191 (04) : 915 - 925
  • [3] Choosing the Right Tool: A Comparative Study of Wetland Assessment Approaches
    Kleindl, William J.
    Church, Sarah P.
    Rains, Mark C.
    Ulrich, Rachel
    WETLANDS, 2024, 44 (05)
  • [4] Integrating targeted genetic markers to genotyping-by-sequencing for an ultimate genotyping tool
    de Ronne, Maxime
    Abed, Amina
    Legare, Gaetan
    Laroche, Jerome
    St-Amour, Vincent-Thomas Boucher
    Fortier, Eric
    Beattie, Aaron
    Badea, Ana
    Khanal, Raja
    O'Donoughue, Louise
    Rajcan, Istvan
    Belzile, Francois
    Boyle, Brian
    Torkamaneh, Davoud
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2024, 137 (10)
  • [5] Choosing the right tool for the job
    Manuf Comput Solutions, 2006, 2 (48-49):
  • [6] CHOOSING THE RIGHT WINDOWS TOOL
    PINELLA, P
    DATAMATION, 1991, 37 (15): : 35 - 36
  • [7] Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) as a tool for interspecies hybrid detection
    Podbielska, Angelika
    Piorkowska, Katarzyna
    ANNALS OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 22 (04) : 1185 - 1192
  • [8] Assistive technology: Choosing the right tool for the right job
    Gamble, Mandy
    Dowler, Denetta
    Orslene, Louis
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2006, 24 (02) : 73 - 80
  • [9] Virtual Care: Choosing the Right Tool, at the Right Time
    Sundar, Kumara Raja
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2021, 19 (04) : 365 - 367
  • [10] Genotyping-by-sequencing: a promising tool for plant genetics research and breeding
    Yong Suk Chung
    Sang Chul Choi
    Tae-Hwan Jun
    Changsoo Kim
    Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 2017, 58 : 425 - 431