How does 'Free, Prior and Informed Consent' (FPIC) impact social equity? Lessons from mining and forestry and their implications for REDD

被引:79
|
作者
Mahanty, Sango [1 ]
McDermott, Constance L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Asia & Pacific, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford Ctr Trop Forests, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
关键词
Equity; Certification; Mining; Forest; Free; prior and informed consent; REDD; RIGHTS; CERTIFICATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The principle of "Free, Prior and Informed Consent" (FPIC) is promoted through international agreements and safeguards in order to strengthen social equity in resource management by requiring consent from indigenous and/or local communities prior to actions that affect their land and resource rights. Based on early experiences with implementing FPIC standards in mining and forestry, we examine how FPIC has impacted social equity and why. In both sectors FPIC was first operationalized through non-governmental standards that revealed ambiguities surrounding its definition and implementation. In mining, FPIC was first codified in the standards of financial investors, while in forestry FPIC emerged within competing market-based certification schemes, resulting in contrasting definitions. In both sectors, contextual factors such as government laws and policies, the socio-political environment and the overall distribution of rights and resources strongly shape the impacts of FPIC on equity particularly for actors without strong legal rights. These findings are significant for emerging arenas such as REDD+, where there is much debate around the role of governments, financial institutions and market-based actors in applying FPIC for social equity outcomes. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:406 / 416
页数:11
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Adapting Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) to Local Contexts in REDD+: Lessons from Three Experiments in Vietnam
    Thuy Thu Pham
    Castella, Jean-Christophe
    Lestrelin, Guillaume
    Mertz, Ole
    Dung Ngoc Le
    Moeliono, Moira
    Tan Quang Nguyen
    Hien Thi Vu
    Tien Dinh Nguyen
    FORESTS, 2015, 6 (07): : 2405 - 2423
  • [2] Mobilising Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) from Below: A Typology of Indigenous Peoples' Agency
    Schilling-Vacaflor, Almut
    Flemmer, Riccarda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MINORITY AND GROUP RIGHTS, 2020, 27 (02) : 291 - 313
  • [3] Dissenting voices in a consenting village: lessons from implementation of free, prior and informed consent at a REDD plus pilot in Tanzania
    Mukisa, P. K.
    Tumusiime, D. M.
    Webersik, C.
    Liwenga, E. T.
    Tabuti, J. R. S.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2020, 22 (01) : 120 - 131
  • [4] 'Free prior and informed consent', social complexity and the mining industry: Establishing a knowledge base
    Owen, John R.
    Kemp, Deanna
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2014, 41 : 91 - 100
  • [5] Free, prior and informed consent: how and from whom? An Australian analogue
    Southalan, John
    Fardin, Joe
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY & NATURAL RESOURCES LAW, 2019, 37 (04) : 365 - 388
  • [6] Free, prior and informed consent: how to rectify the devastating consequences of harmful mining for indigenous peoples'
    MacInnes, Angus
    Colchester, Marcus
    Whitmore, Andrew
    PERSPECTIVES IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2017, 15 (03) : 152 - 160
  • [7] The Transformative Potential of Indigenous-Driven Approaches to Implementing Free, Prior and Informed Consent: Lessons from Two Canadian Cases
    Papillon, Martin
    Rodon, Thierry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MINORITY AND GROUP RIGHTS, 2020, 27 (02) : 314 - 335