Comparing Yes/No Angoff and Bookmark Standard Setting Methods in the Context of English Assessment

被引:6
|
作者
Hsieh, Mingchuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Acad Educ Res, New Taipei City 23703, Taiwan
关键词
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS;
D O I
10.1080/15434303.2013.769550
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The Yes/No Angoff and Bookmark method for setting standards on educational assessment are currently two of the most popular standard-setting methods. However, there is no research into the comparability of these two methods in the context of language assessment. This study compared results from the Yes/No Angoff and Bookmark methods as applied to a Taiwanese national sixth-grade English assessment composed only of multiple-choice items. Thirty-two panelists implemented both methods to establish three cut scores. The results show there are discrepancies in the final mean cut scores between the two methods, with some large differences. Evaluation data collected from standard-setting panelists indicated similar levels of confidence in setting cut scores, and each standard-setting procedure has its own strengths and weaknesses. Implications of this study and future research directions are presented at the end of this study.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 350
页数:20
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] A comparison of Angoff and Bookmark standard setting methods
    Buckendahl, CW
    Smith, RW
    Impara, JC
    Plake, BS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 39 (03) : 253 - 263
  • [2] A Comparison of Bookmark and Angoff Standard Setting Methods
    Cetin, Sevda
    Gelbal, Selahattin
    [J]. KURAM VE UYGULAMADA EGITIM BILIMLERI, 2013, 13 (04): : 2169 - 2175
  • [3] A Comparison of Angoff, Yes/No and Ebel Standard Setting Methods
    Gundeger, Ceylan
    Dogan, Nuri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2014, 5 (01): : 53 - 60
  • [4] Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests
    Majid Yousefi Afrashteh
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 21
  • [5] Comparison of the validity of bookmark and Angoff standard setting methods in medical performance tests
    Yousefi Afrashteh, Majid
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [6] Comparison of standard-setting methods for the Korea Radiological technologist Licensing Examination : Angoff, Ebel, Bookmark, and Hofstee
    Park, Janghee
    Ahn, Duck-Sun
    Yim, Mi Kyoung
    Lee, Jaehyoung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2018, 15 : 32
  • [7] Evaluating methodological enhancements to the Yes/No Angoff standard-setting method in language proficiency assessment
    Fechter, Tia M.
    Yoon, Heeyeon
    [J]. LANGUAGE TESTING, 2024, 41 (03) : 530 - 556
  • [8] An application of Multifaceted Rasch measurement in the Yes/No Angoff standard setting procedure
    Hsieh, Mingchuan
    [J]. LANGUAGE TESTING, 2013, 30 (04) : 491 - 512
  • [9] Reducing the Cognitive Complexity Associated With Standard Setting: A Comparison of the Single-Passage Bookmark and Yes/No Methods
    Skaggs, Gary
    Hein, Serge F.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2011, 71 (03) : 571 - 592
  • [10] A Validity Study For Yes/No Angoff Standard Setting Method Using Cluster Analysis
    Tseng, Fen-Lan
    Chiou, Jia-Min
    Sung, Yao-Ting
    [J]. 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), 2015, : 727 - 731