Representation of Ecological Systems within the Protected Areas Network of the Continental United States

被引:99
|
作者
Aycrigg, Jocelyn L. [1 ]
Davidson, Anne [1 ]
Svancara, Leona K. [2 ]
Gergely, Kevin J. [3 ]
McKerrow, Alexa [4 ]
Scott, J. Michael
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Fish & Wildlife Sci, Natl Gap Anal Program, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[2] Idaho Dept Fish & Game, Moscow, ID USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Gap Anal Program, Boise, ID USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Gap Anal Program, Raleigh, NC USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
GAP ANALYSIS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; VEGETATION; WORLD; FRAMEWORK; COVERAGE; SCIENCE; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0054689
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
If conservation of biodiversity is the goal, then the protected areas network of the continental US may be one of our best conservation tools for safeguarding ecological systems (i.e., vegetation communities). We evaluated representation of ecological systems in the current protected areas network and found insufficient representation at three vegetation community levels within lower elevations and moderate to high productivity soils. We used national-level data for ecological systems and a protected areas database to explore alternative ways we might be able to increase representation of ecological systems within the continental US. By following one or more of these alternatives it may be possible to increase the representation of ecological systems in the protected areas network both quantitatively (from 10% up to 39%) and geographically and come closer to meeting the suggested Convention on Biological Diversity target of 17% for terrestrial areas. We used the Landscape Conservation Cooperative framework for regional analysis and found that increased conservation on some private and public lands may be important to the conservation of ecological systems in Western US, while increased public-private partnerships may be important in the conservation of ecological systems in Eastern US. We have not assessed the pros and cons of following the national or regional alternatives, but rather present them as possibilities that may be considered and evaluated as decisions are made to increase the representation of ecological systems in the protected areas network across their range of ecological, geographical, and geophysical occurrence in the continental US into the future.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of privately protected areas in achieving biodiversity representation within a national protected area network
    Ivanova, Ielyzaveta M.
    Cook, Carly N.
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (12)
  • [2] Remote sensing change detection for ecological monitoring in United States protected areas
    Willis, Katherine S.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 182 : 233 - 242
  • [3] The ecological effectiveness of protected areas: The United Kingdom
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Charman, Kevin
    Jackson, Sarah F.
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Bonn, Aletta
    Briers, Robert A.
    Callaghan, Claire S. Q.
    Catchpole, Roger
    Hopkins, John
    Kunin, William E.
    Latham, Jim
    Opdam, Paul
    Stoneman, Rob
    Stroud, David A.
    Tratt, Ros
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 132 (01) : 76 - 87
  • [4] Representation of ecological regions by protected areas at the global scale
    Hazen, HD
    Anthamatten, PI
    [J]. PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY, 2004, 25 (06) : 499 - 512
  • [5] Spatial patterns of evolutionary diversity in Cactaceae show low ecological representation within protected areas
    Amaral, Danilo Trabuco
    Bonatelli, Isabel A. S.
    Romeiro-Brito, Monique
    Moraes, Evandro Marsola
    Franco, Fernando Faria
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2022, 273
  • [6] Plastic rain in protected areas of the United States
    Brahney, Janice
    Hallerud, Margaret
    Heim, Eric
    Hahnenberger, Maura
    Sukumaran, Suja
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2020, 368 (6496) : 1257 - +
  • [7] Protected areas as criteria of Ecological ICMS in Brazilian states
    Carvalho Lima, Isabella Moura
    Gomes, Laura Jane
    Fernandes, Milton Marques
    [J]. DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2020, 54 : 125 - 145
  • [8] Planktonic linkages among marine protected areas on the south Florida and southeast United States continental shelves
    Hare, Jonathan A.
    Walsh, Harvey J.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2007, 64 (09) : 1234 - 1247
  • [9] Towards 'ecological coherence': Assessing larval dispersal within a network of existing Marine Protected Areas
    Ross, Rebecca E.
    Nimmo-Smith, W. Alex M.
    Howell, Kerry L.
    [J]. DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART I-OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH PAPERS, 2017, 126 : 128 - 138
  • [10] Low ecological representation in the protected area network of China
    Xu, Haigen
    Cao, Mingchang
    Wang, Zhi
    Wu, Yi
    Cao, Yun
    Wu, Jun
    Le, Zhifang
    Cui, Peng
    Ding, Hui
    Xu, Wanggu
    Peng, Hua
    Jiang, Jianping
    Wu, Yuhu
    Jiang, Xuelong
    Zhang, Zhiyun
    Rao, Dingqi
    Li, Jianqiang
    Lei, Fumin
    Xia, Nianhe
    Han, Lianxian
    Cao, Wei
    Wu, Jiayu
    Xia, Xin
    Li, Yimin
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2018, 8 (12): : 6290 - 6298