3D magnetic inversion based on probability tomography and its GPU implement

被引:18
|
作者
Liu, Guofeng [1 ]
Meng, Xiaohong [1 ]
Chen, Zhaoxi [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Geophys & Informat Technol, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Magnetic inversion; Probability tomography; GPU; Optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2012.05.025
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
There are two types of three-dimensional (3D) magnetic inversion methods based on the classification of the inversion result, one is the inversion approach that determines a 3D susceptibility distribution that produces a given magnetic anomaly, and the other is to inverse the source distribution in a purely probabilistic sense, in which the inversion results are equivalent physical parameters between +1 and -1. The second method is easier and more stable, but obtaining the susceptibility directly to recognize certain lithology is often more desirable. Furthermore, it is difficult to add an external geological constraint in the second method for reducing the nonuniqueness of magnetic inversion. Herein, we propose an iterative method to inverse the susceptibility based on the second method. The proposed method obtains the perturbation of susceptibility by multiplying some susceptibility with the Probability tomography result of misfits in observed data and forward data given a certain susceptibility model. We present a graphic processing unit (GPU) scheme to tackle an intensive computing problem. The forward and probability function are computed in parallel on the CPU. Incorporating reasonable parallel strategies and three key optimization steps like memory optimization, execution configuration optimization and instruction optimization, the 3D magnetic inversion in this paper on a Tesla C2050 CPU shows greatly improved efficiency compared to serial code on a 2.5 GHz CPU, with a 60-fold increase in speed especially for the large volumes of data. We design a synthetic model with two prismatic susceptibility anomalies. The inversion result of this model also proves the effectiveness of the inversion method introduced in this paper. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 92
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D fast inversion of gravity data based on GPU
    WANG Xusheng
    ZENG Zhaofa
    [J]. Global Geology, 2018, 21 (02) : 114 - 119
  • [2] 3D gravity interface inversion constrained by a few points and its GPU acceleration
    Chen, Zhaoxi
    Meng, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Sheng
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2015, 84 : 20 - 28
  • [3] 3D stochastic inversion of magnetic data
    Shamsipour, Pejman
    Chouteau, Michel
    Marcotte, Denis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 73 (04) : 336 - 347
  • [4] GPU-based iterative transmission reconstruction in 3D ultrasound computer tomography
    Birk, Matthias
    Dapp, Robin
    Ruiter, N. V.
    Becker, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, 2014, 74 (01) : 1730 - 1743
  • [5] High Speed 3D Tomography on CPU, GPU, and FPGA
    Nicolas, G. A. C.
    Mancini, Stephane
    Desvignes, Michel
    Houzet, Dominique
    [J]. EURASIP JOURNAL ON EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, 2008, (01)
  • [6] 3D hybrid-domain full waveform inversion on GPU
    Liu, Lu
    Ding, Renwei
    Liu, Hongwei
    Liu, Hong
    [J]. COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2015, 83 : 27 - 36
  • [7] Monte-Carlo-based inversion scheme for 3D quantitative photoacoustic tomography
    Kaplan, Bernhard A.
    Buchmann, Jens
    Prohaska, Steffen
    Laufer, Jan
    [J]. PHOTONS PLUS ULTRASOUND: IMAGING AND SENSING 2017, 2017, 10064
  • [8] 3D variable-grid full-waveform inversion on GPU
    Wang, Zi-Ying
    Huang, Jian-Ping
    Liu, Ding-Jin
    Li, Zhen-Chun
    Yong, Peng
    Yang, Zhen-Jie
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (05) : 1001 - 1014
  • [9] 3D variable-grid full-waveform inversion on GPU
    ZiYing Wang
    JianPing Huang
    DingJin Liu
    ZhenChun Li
    Peng Yong
    ZhenJie Yang
    [J]. Petroleum Science., 2019, 16 (05) - 1014
  • [10] 3D variable-grid full-waveform inversion on GPU
    Zi-Ying Wang
    Jian-Ping Huang
    Ding-Jin Liu
    Zhen-Chun Li
    Peng Yong
    Zhen-Jie Yang
    [J]. Petroleum Science, 2019, (05) : 1001 - 1014