PUPARIATION SITE PREFERENCE WITHIN AND BETWEEN DROSOPHILA SIBLING SPECIES

被引:16
|
作者
Erezyilmaz, Deniz F. [1 ,2 ]
Stern, David L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Behavioral evolution; Drosophila sechellia; Drosophila simulans; innate preference; pupation; POPULATION-GENETICS; PUPATION SITE; MELANOGASTER; DIVERGENCE; SIMULANS; POLYMORPHISM; SELECTION; SUBGROUP; BEHAVIOR; HISTORY;
D O I
10.1111/evo.12146
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Holometabolous insects pass through a sedentary pupal stage and often choose a location for pupation that is different from the site of larval feeding. We have characterized a difference in pupariation site choice within and between sibling species of Drosophila. We found that, in nature, Drosophila sechellia pupariate within their host fruit, Morinda citrifolia, and that they perform this behavior in laboratory assays. In contrast, in the laboratory, geographically diverse strains of Drosophila simulans vary in their pupariation site preference; D. simulans lines from the ancestral range in southeast Africa pupariate on fruit, or a fruit substitute, whereas populations from Europe or the New World select sites off of fruit. We explored the genetic basis for the evolved preference in puariation site preference by performing quantitative trait locus mapping within and between species. We found that the interspecific difference is controlled largely by loci on chromosomes X and II. In contrast, variation between two strains of D. simulans appears to be highly polygenic, with the majority of phenotypic effects due to loci on chromosome III. These data address the genetic basis of how new traits arise as species diverge and populations disperse.
引用
收藏
页码:2714 / 2727
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Melanic pigmentation and light preference within and between two Drosophila species
    Cooley, Arielle M.
    Schmitz, Suzanne
    Cabrera, Eduardo J.
    Cutter, Mitchell
    Sheffield, Maxwell
    Gingerich, Ian
    Thomas, Gabriella
    Lincoln, Calvin N. M.
    Moore, Virginia H.
    Moore, Alexandra E.
    Davidson, Sarah A.
    Lonberg, Nikhil
    Fournier, Eli B.
    Love, Sophia M.
    Posch, Galen
    Bihrle, Matthew B.
    Mayer, Spencer D.
    Om, Kuenzang
    Wilson, Lauren
    Doe, Casey Q.
    Vincent, Chantalle E.
    Wong, Elizabeth R. T.
    Wall, Ilona
    Wicks, Jarred
    Roberts, Stephon
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 11 (18): : 12542 - 12553
  • [2] REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN SIBLING SPECIES DROSOPHILA PAVANI + DROSOPHILA GAUCHA
    KOREFSANTIBANEZ, S
    EVOLUTION, 1964, 18 (02) : 245 - &
  • [4] CHROMOSOMAL REORGANIZATION WITHIN 4 ALLOPATRIC SIBLING SPECIES OF HAWAIIAN DROSOPHILA
    YOON, JS
    RICHARDS.RH
    WHEELER, MR
    GENETICS, 1973, 74 (JUN) : S304 - S304
  • [5] BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN 2 SPECIES OF CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA .3. OVIPOSITION SITE PREFERENCE
    FOGLEMAN, JC
    HACKBARTH, KR
    HEED, WB
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1981, 118 (04): : 541 - 548
  • [6] BEHAVIORAL DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN 2 SPECIES OF CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA .2. PUPATION SITE PREFERENCE
    FOGLEMAN, JC
    MARKOW, TA
    SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST, 1982, 27 (03) : 315 - 320
  • [7] ETHANOL - LARVAL DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN 2 DROSOPHILA SIBLING SPECIES
    PARSONS, PA
    KING, SB
    EXPERIENTIA, 1977, 33 (07): : 898 - 899
  • [8] MUTATION-RATES IN HYBRIDS BETWEEN SIBLING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA
    COYNE, JA
    HEREDITY, 1989, 63 : 155 - 162
  • [9] ON SEXUAL ISOLATION BETWEEN A PAIR OF SYMPATRIC SIBLING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA
    GUPTA, JP
    BIHARI, B
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1986, 24 (05) : 267 - 269
  • [10] THE GENETICS OF AN ISOLATING MECHANISM BETWEEN 2 SIBLING SPECIES OF DROSOPHILA
    COYNE, JA
    EVOLUTION, 1993, 47 (03) : 778 - 788