Supplemental datasets for the examination of the revival of large consulting practices at the big 4 and audit quality

被引:0
|
作者
Donelson, Dain C. [1 ]
Ege, Matthew [2 ]
Imdieke, Andrew J. [3 ]
Maksymov, Eldar [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Henry B Tippie Coll Business, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Mays Business Sch, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Mendoza Coll Business, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Sch Accountancy, WP Carey Sch Business, POB 873606, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
来源
DATA IN BRIEF | 2020年 / 32卷
关键词
Audit Quality; Audit Regulation; Consulting; PCAOB;
D O I
10.1016/j.dib.2020.106132
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
These data analyses have been co-submitted to Accounting, Organizations, and Society with the research article "The Revival of Large Consulting Practices at the Big 4 and Audit Quality " [2]. The purpose of these data analyses is to assist readers of the research article in obtaining further detailed analyses performed therein regarding the channels through which audit quality is affected by consulting firm acquisitions. These analyses include 1) the timing of the effects of consulting firm acquisitions on audit quality; 2) the size of the consulting firm acquisition's effect on audit quality; 3) whether acquisitions differentially affect restatement breadth; 4) whether results are due to the PCAOB targeting offices that acquire consulting practices; and 5) whether consulting firm acquisitions affect national audit firm audit quality. These analyses can inform future research on audit quality by providing insights that may be useful in developing research ideas and performing extensions of these analyses. Some data used in these analyses are available via a subscription to the Wharton Research Data Service while other data are publicly available via search of Google, and, with subscription, via search of Factiva, and the Capital IQ database. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] The revival of large consulting practices at the Big 4 and audit quality
    Donelson, Dain C.
    Ege, Matthew
    Imdieke, Andrew J.
    Maksymov, Eldar
    [J]. ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 2020, 87
  • [2] Client Consulting Opportunities and the Reemergence of Big 4 Consulting Practices: Implications for the Audit Market
    Cowle, Elizabeth N.
    Kleppe, Tyler J.
    Moon, James R., Jr.
    Shipman, Jonathan E.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2022, 97 (07): : 135 - 168
  • [3] Supplemental datasets for examination of the PCAOB's relationship with the audit profession in the United States
    Ege, Matthew
    Knechel, W. Robert
    Lamoreaux, Phillip T.
    Maksymov, Eldar
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 31
  • [4] The impact of Big 4 consulting on audit reporting lag and restatements
    Meckfessel, Michele D.
    Sellers, Drew
    [J]. MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2017, 32 (01) : 19 - 49
  • [5] Impact of audit tenure and audit rotation on the audit quality: Big 4 vs non big 4
    Martani, Dwi
    Rahmah, Nur Aulia
    Fitriany, Fitriany
    Anggraita, Viska
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2021, 9 (01):
  • [6] CPAs and Big 4 office audit quality
    Nagy, Albert L.
    Sherwood, Matthew G.
    Zimmerman, Aleksandra B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 42 (02)
  • [7] Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality
    Francis, Jere R.
    Yu, Michael D.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2009, 84 (05): : 1521 - 1552
  • [8] Investigating audit quality among Big 4 Malaysian firms
    Carlin, Tyrone M.
    Finch, Nigel
    Laili, Nur Hidayah
    [J]. ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2009, 17 (02) : 96 - 114
  • [9] How Big-4 Firms Improve Audit Quality
    Che, Limei
    Hope, Ole-Kristian
    Langli, John Christian
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 66 (10) : 4552 - 4572
  • [10] Fee competition among Big 4 auditors and audit quality
    Sharad Asthana
    Inder Khurana
    K. K. Raman
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2019, 52 : 403 - 438