Validity of the SenseWear® Armband to Predict Energy Expenditure in Pregnant Women

被引:41
|
作者
Smith, Katie M. [1 ,2 ]
Lanningham-Foster, Lorraine M. [1 ,2 ]
Welk, Gregory J. [2 ,3 ]
Campbell, Christina G. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Interdept Grad Program Nutr Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Sandy S & Roy W Uelner Food Sci & Human Nutr, Ames, IA 50011 USA
来源
关键词
ACTIVITY MONITOR; VALIDATION; PREGNANCY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; ASSESSMENT; DOUBLY-LABELED WATER; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY SURVEY; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; MONITOR; ACCELEROMETER; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825ce76f
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
SMITH, K. M., L. M. LANNINGHAM-FOSTER, G. J. WELK, and C. G. CAMPBELL. Validity of the SenseWear (R) Armband to Predict Energy Expenditure in Pregnant Women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 44, No. 10, pp. 2001-2008, 2012. Few valid, objective methods exist to quantify physical activity and predict energy expenditure (EE) during pregnancy. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of the SenseWear (R) Mini armband monitor (SWA) (BodyMedia, Pittsburgh, PA) to estimate EE in pregnant women. Methods: Thirty healthy pregnant women (22-24 wk of gestation) completed a series of activities of daily living (typing, laundry, sweeping, and treadmill walking: 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, and 3.0 mph, 3% incline) while EE was estimated by the SWA and measured by indirect calorimetry (IC). The SWA data were processed using both the v2.2 algorithm and the newer v5.2 algorithm. The estimated EE values were compared with the measured EE values using a three-way (method x algorithm x activity) mixed model ANOVA. Least square means T SE were estimated in the model. Significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The analyses revealed a significant method (IC vs. SWA) x algorithm (v5.2 vs. v2.2) interaction with significantly smaller error (IC-SWA) for the newer v5.2 algorithm (-0.57 +/- 0.06 kcal.min(-1)) than the older v2.2 algorithm (-0.78 +/- 0.06 kcal.min(-1)). The SWA significantly overestimated EE for all activities, except inclined walking. The average mean absolute percentage error was considerably lower for the new algorithm (22%) than that for the older algorithm (35%). The average individual correlation coefficients revealed good overall agreement between the SWA and the IC (v5.2, mean r = 0.93; v2.2, mean r = 0.87). Conclusion: Overall, the SWA correlated well with IC; however, EE was significantly overestimated during most activities. Future studies should develop pregnancy-specific algorithms and assess validity of the SWA at all stages of pregnancy to further improve prediction of EE in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:2001 / 2008
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity of the SenseWear Armband to Assess Energy Expenditure in Graded Walking
    Vernillo, Gianluca
    Savoldelli, Aldo
    Pellegrini, Barbara
    Schena, Federico
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2015, 12 (02): : 178 - 183
  • [2] Assessing Energy Expenditure in Male Endurance Athletes: Validity of the SenseWear Armband
    Koehler, Karsten
    Braun, Hans
    De Marees, Markus
    Fusch, Gerhard
    Fusch, Christoph
    Schaenzer, Wilhelm
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2011, 43 (07): : 1328 - 1333
  • [3] Validity of the Sensewear Armband to Measure Energy Expenditure During Walking Early after Stroke
    Kramer, S.
    Cumming, T.
    Bernhardt, J.
    Johnson, L.
    [J]. CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2016, 42 : 103 - 104
  • [4] SenseWear Armband and Stroke: Validity of Energy Expenditure and Step Count Measurement during Walking
    Manns, Patricia J.
    Haennel, Robert G.
    [J]. STROKE RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 2012
  • [5] Validity of SenseWear® Armband v5.2 and v2.2 for estimating energy expenditure
    Bhammar, Dharini M.
    Sawyer, Brandon J.
    Tucker, Wesley J.
    Lee, Jung-Min
    Gaesser, Glenn A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2016, 34 (19) : 1830 - 1838
  • [6] Accuracy of SenseWear Pro2 Armband to Predict Resting Energy Expenditure in Childhood Obesity
    Predieri, Barbara
    Bruzzi, Patrizia
    Lami, Francesca
    Vellani, Giulia
    Malavolti, Marcella
    Battistini, Nino C.
    Iughetti, Lorenzo
    [J]. OBESITY, 2013, 21 (12) : 2465 - 2470
  • [7] Binormal distribution and energy expenditure measured with SenseWear™ Pro Armband
    Park, Y
    [J]. RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2006, 77 (01) : A40 - A41
  • [8] Validity of the SenseWear Armband to Assess Energy Expenditure During Intermittent Exercise and Recovery in Rugby Union Players
    Zanetti, Sara
    Pumpa, Kate L.
    Wheeler, Keane W.
    Pyne, David B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2014, 28 (04) : 1090 - 1095
  • [9] Validity of SenseWear Armband to Estimate Energy Expenditure During Activities of Daily Living In Rheumatoid Arthritis.
    Tierney, Marie
    Fraser, Alexander D.
    Kennedy, Norelee M.
    [J]. ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2011, 63 (10): : S941 - S942
  • [10] Energy Expenditure Evaluation in Humans and Non-Human Primates by SenseWear Armband. Validation of Energy Expenditure Evaluation by SenseWear Armband by Direct Comparison with Indirect Calorimetry
    Casiraghi, Francesca
    Lertwattanarak, Raweewan
    Luzi, Livio
    Chavez, Alberto O.
    Davalli, Alberto M.
    Naegelin, Terry
    Comuzzie, Anthony G.
    Frost, Patricia
    Musi, Nicolas
    Folli, Franco
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):