Barriers and Facilitators for Referrals of Primary Care Patients to Blended Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Depression: Mixed Methods Study of General Practitioners' Views

被引:15
|
作者
Titzler, Ingrid [1 ]
Berking, Matthias [1 ]
Schlicker, Sandra [1 ]
Riper, Heleen [2 ,3 ]
Ebert, David Daniel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Nagelsbachstr 25a, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Sect Clin Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] GGZinGeest, Dept Res & Innovat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
JMIR MENTAL HEALTH | 2020年 / 7卷 / 08期
关键词
barriers and facilitators; general practitioners; depression; referral; blended therapy; internet-based intervention; mobile phone; psychotherapy; qualitative research; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIOR THERAPY; MENTAL-HEALTH-SERVICES; INTERVENTIONS; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; GERMANY; IMPLEMENTATION; RECOGNITION; SPECIALISTS; INTERVIEWS;
D O I
10.2196/18642
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is highly prevalent and often managed by general practitioners (GPs). GPs mostly prescribe medication and show low referral rates to psychotherapy. Many patients remain untreated. Blended psychotherapy (bPT) combines internet-based interventions with face-to-face psychotherapy and could increase treatment access and availability. Effectively implementing bPT in routine care requires an understanding of professional users' perspectives and behavior. Objective: This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators perceived by GPs in referring patients to bPT. Explanations for variations in referral rates were examined. Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 12 of 110 GPs participating in a German randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate barriers to and facilitators for referrals to bPT for MDD (10 web-based modules, app-based assessments, and 6 face-to-face sessions). The interview guide was based on the theoretical domains framework. The interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the qualitative content was analyzed by 2 independent coders (intercoder agreement, k=0.71). A follow-up survey with 12 interviewed GPs enabled the validation of emergent themes. The differences in the barriers and facilitators identified between groups with different characteristics (eg, GPs with high or low referral rates) were described. Correlations between referrals and characteristics, self-rated competences, and experiences managing depression of the RCT-GPs (n=76) were conducted. Results: GPs referred few patients to bPT, although varied in their referral rates, and interviewees referred more than twice as many patients as RCT-GPs (interview-GPs: mean 6.34, SD 9.42; RCT-GPs: mean 2.65, SD 3.92). A negative correlation was found between GPs' referrals and their self-rated pharmacotherapeutic competence, r(73)=-0.31, P<.001. The qualitative findings revealed a total of 19 barriers (B) and 29 facilitators (F), at the levels of GP (B=4 and F=11), patient (B=11 and F=9), GP practice (B=1 and F=3), and sociopolitical circumstances (B=3 and F=6). Key barriers stated by all interviewed GPs included "little knowledge about internet-based interventions" and "patients' lack of familiarity with technology/internet/media" (number of statements, each k=22). Key facilitators were "perceived patient suitability, e.g. well-educated, young" (k=22) and "no conflict with GP's role" (k=16). The follow-up survey showed a very high agreement rate of at least 75% for 71% (34/48) of the identified themes. Descriptive findings indicated differences between GPs with low and high referral rates in terms of which and how many barriers (low: mean 9.75, SD 1.83; high: mean 10.50, SD 2.38) and facilitators (low: mean 18.25, SD 4.13; high: mean 21.00; SD 3.92) they mentioned. Conclusions: This study provides insights into factors influencing GPs' referrals to bPT as gatekeepers to depression care. Barriers and facilitators should be considered when designing implementation strategies to enhance referral rates. The findings should be interpreted with care because of the small and self-selected sample and low response rates.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers and facilitators to the integration of depression services in primary care in Vietnam: a mixed methods study
    Jill Murphy
    Kitty K. Corbett
    Dang Thuy Linh
    Pham Thi Oanh
    Vu Cong Nguyen
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 18
  • [2] Barriers and facilitators to the integration of depression services in primary care in Vietnam: a mixed methods study
    Murphy, Jill
    Corbett, Kitty K.
    Dang Thuy Linh
    Pham Thi Oanh
    Vu Cong Nguyen
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [3] Optimizing the care of patients with depression in primary care: the views of general practitioners
    Railton, S
    Mowat, H
    Bain, J
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2000, 8 (02) : 119 - 128
  • [4] The views of general practitioners and practice nurses towards the barriers and facilitators of proactive, internet-based chlamydia screening for reaching young heterosexual men
    Lorimer, Karen
    Martin, Susan
    McDaid, Lisa M.
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 15
  • [5] The views of general practitioners and practice nurses towards the barriers and facilitators of proactive, internet-based chlamydia screening for reaching young heterosexual men
    Karen Lorimer
    Susan Martin
    Lisa M McDaid
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 15
  • [6] The care of patients with subthreshold depression in primary care: Is it all that bad? A qualitative study on the views of general practitioners and patients
    Backenstrass, Matthias
    Joest, Katharina
    Rosemann, Thomas
    Szecsenyi, Joachim
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2007, 7 (1)
  • [7] The care of patients with subthreshold depression in primary care: Is it all that bad? A qualitative study on the views of general practitioners and patients
    Matthias Backenstrass
    Katharina Joest
    Thomas Rosemann
    Joachim Szecsenyi
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 7
  • [8] Primary care evidence in clinical guidelines: a mixed methods study of practitioners' views
    Abdelhamid, Asmaa
    Howe, Amanda
    Stokes, Tim
    Qureshi, Nadeem
    Steel, Nick
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 64 (628): : E719 - E727
  • [9] Primary prevention in general practice – views of German general practitioners: a mixed-methods study
    Christine Holmberg
    Giselle Sarganas
    Nadine Mittring
    Vittoria Braun
    Lorena Dini
    Christoph Heintze
    Nina Rieckmann
    Rebecca Muckelbauer
    Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn
    [J]. BMC Family Practice, 15
  • [10] Primary prevention in general practice - views of German general practitioners: a mixed-methods study
    Holmberg, Christine
    Sarganas, Giselle
    Mittring, Nadine
    Braun, Vittoria
    Dini, Lorena
    Heintze, Christoph
    Rieckmann, Nina
    Muckelbauer, Rebecca
    Mueller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline
    [J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 15