The contribution of spike photosynthesis to wheat yield needs to be considered in process-based crop models

被引:28
|
作者
Zhang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Yanmei [1 ]
Zhang, Yinghua [1 ]
Fischer, Tony [2 ]
Zhao, Zhigan [2 ]
Zhou, Xiaonan [1 ]
Wang, Zhimin [1 ]
Wang, Enli [2 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] CSIRO Agr & Food, Clunies Ross St, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
wheat; grain yield; organ contribution; remobilization; crop modelling; APSIM; TRITICUM-AESTIVUM L; DURUM-WHEAT; EAR PHOTOSYNTHESIS; GRAIN-YIELD; FLAG LEAF; WHOLE-PLANT; WATER-USE; CULTIVARS; SYSTEMS; APSIM;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107931
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Process-based crop models are increasingly used to simulate Genotype by Environment by Management interactions (GxExM), and to evaluate importance of physiological traits to assist in breeding selections. This requires the model to correctly simulate the key physiological processes that determine grain yield. Although spike photosynthesis contributes to grain yield of wheat, it has not been explicitly simulated in most crop models. Here we present experimental data from China and Mexico, derived from estimates of spike contributions to grain yield of wheat, and compared them with previous results. We then used the APSIM model to investigate the consequences of excluding and including spike contributions on simulation results, against the data from China consisting of 4 irrigation and plant density treatments. Our results show that the contribution of spikes photosynthesis to grain yield ranged from 9.8% to 39.0% with an average of 20.1%, consistent with results from previous studies. However, despite the omission of the contribution from spike photosynthesis to grain yield, APSIM captured the dynamics of LAI and biomass and grain yield with acceptable accuracy. Across the treatments, the APSIM (version 7.9) explained > 78% of the variation in yield (RMSE = 737 kg ha(-1)) and biomass (RMSE = 1438 kg ha(-1)) compared with the experimental data. This highlight the fact that APSIM performed well in simulating yield partly for the wrong reasons. Adding spike contribution to APSIM improved the simulations of biomass and yield, particularly under high yield level. More detailed analysis revealed that APSIM overestimated leaf contribution to compensate neglection of spike contribution, explained by the overestimation of leave biomass and underestimation of stem biomass. While APSIM captured the trend of changes in pre-anthesis remobilization contribution to grain yield, it also underestimated this contribution across treatments. Future improvements should include the inclusion of spike photosynthesis contribution with correct spike light interception and RUE, and improved modelling of biomass partitioning to different organs and the remobilization of biomass to grain from pre-anthesis growth.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing process-based wheat growth models in their simulation of yield losses caused by plant diseases
    Bregaglio, Simone
    Willocquet, Laetitia
    Kersebaum, Kurt Christian
    Ferrise, Roberto
    Stella, Tommaso
    Ferreira, Thiago Berton
    Pavan, Willingthon
    Asseng, Senthold
    Savary, Serge
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2021, 265
  • [2] Contrasting contributions of five factors to wheat yield growth in China by process-based and statistical models
    Liu, Huan
    Xiong, Wei
    Mottaleb, Khondoker A.
    Krupnik, Timothy J.
    Burgueno, Juan
    Pequeno, Diego N. L.
    Wu, Wenbin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2021, 130
  • [3] Potential yield simulated by global gridded crop models: using a process-based emulator to explain their differences
    Ringeval, Bruno
    Mueller, Christoph
    Pugh, Thomas A. M.
    Mueller, Nathaniel D.
    Ciais, Philippe
    Folberth, Christian
    Liu, Wenfeng
    Debaeke, Philippe
    Pellerin, Sylvain
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 14 (03) : 1639 - 1656
  • [4] Process-Based Crop Models in Soil Research: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Wimalasiri, Eranga M.
    Ariyachandra, Sachini
    Jayawardhana, Aruna
    Dharmasekara, Thejani
    Jahanshiri, Ebrahim
    Muttil, Nitin
    Rathnayake, Upaka
    [J]. SOIL SYSTEMS, 2023, 7 (02)
  • [5] Data requirement for effective calibration of process-based crop models
    He, Di
    Wang, Enli
    Wang, Jing
    Robertson, Michael J.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2017, 234 : 136 - 148
  • [6] Contribution of Crop Models to Adaptation in Wheat
    Chenu, Karine
    Porter, John Roy
    Martre, Pierre
    Basso, Bruno
    Chapman, Scott Cameron
    Ewert, Frank
    Bindi, Marco
    Asseng, Senthold
    [J]. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2017, 22 (06) : 472 - 490
  • [7] Basic Soil Data Requirements for Process-Based Crop Models as a Basis for Crop Diversification
    Wimalasiri, Eranga M.
    Jahanshiri, Ebrahim
    Suhairi, Tengku Adhwa Syaherah Tengku Mohd
    Udayangani, Hasika
    Mapa, Ranjith B.
    Karunaratne, Asha S.
    Vidhanarachchi, Lal P.
    Azam-Ali, Sayed N.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (18)
  • [8] Improving process-based crop models to better capture genotypexenvironmentxmanagement interactions
    Wang, Enli
    Brown, Hamish E.
    Rebetzke, Greg J.
    Zhao, Zhigan
    Zheng, Bangyou
    Chapman, Scott C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2019, 70 (09) : 2389 - 2401
  • [9] Incorporating Process-Based Crop Simulation Models into Global Economic Analyses
    Robertson, Richard
    Nelson, Gerald
    Thomas, Timothy
    Rosegrant, Mark
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 95 (02) : 228 - 235
  • [10] Comparing and combining process-based crop models and statistical models with some implications for climate change
    Roberts, Michael J.
    Braun, Noah O.
    Sinclair, Thomas R.
    Lobell, David B.
    Schlenker, Wolfram
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 12 (09):