Experimental evaluation of dual frame structures with thin-walled steel panels

被引:26
|
作者
Dubina, D. [1 ,2 ]
Dinu, F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Politeh Univ, Timisoara, Romania
[2] Acad Romana, Lab Steel Struct, Timisoara Branch, Timisoara, Romania
关键词
Thin walled steel shear wall; Link beam; Semi-rigid connection; Energy dissipation; Behavior factor; PLATE SHEAR WALL; CYCLIC BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.tws.2014.01.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Steel plate shear walls (SPSW) are efficient structural systems for resisting lateral loads owing to their high initial stiffness and stable cyclic behavior in the plastic range. The seismic response may be improved by connecting plate walls through link beams. Beam-to-column connections may range from simple connections to full rigid moment resisting connections. Given that initial stiffness is provided mainly by the plates' rigidity, simple connections between horizontal and vertical boundary elements can be employed. Rigid, but expensive, connections may prove more beneficial than simple ones by increasing the frame capacity and also reducing residual drift after an earthquake. The more cost-effective semi-rigid connections between these members are also expected to increase capacity and reduce residual drift in comparison to simple connections. This study investigates the behavior of dual steel frames with thin walled steel shear walls and link beams. Four half-scale specimens were tested under monotonic and cyclic loading for characterizing energy dissipation and evaluating seismic behavior factors. The specimens exhibited good, stable behavior. The rigid beam-to-column connections, when compared to the semi-rigid ones, improved the ultimate capacity and dissipated energy. The experimental program provides a basis for validating a numerical model of slender SPSW. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 69
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seismic design method for thin-walled steel frame structures
    Usami, T
    Zheng, Y
    Ge, HB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2001, 127 (02): : 137 - 144
  • [2] Ductility evaluation procedure for thin-walled steel structures
    Zheng, Y
    Usami, T
    Ge, HB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (11): : 1312 - 1319
  • [3] BEHAVIOR OF THIN-WALLED STEEL FRAME JOINTS
    VAYAS, I
    BRIASSOULIS, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 1993, 24 (02) : 105 - 119
  • [4] IMPACT RESPONSE OF THIN-WALLED FRAME STRUCTURES
    ISHIYAMA, S
    TAKAGI, J
    YAMAMOTO, K
    NISHIMURA, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 1988, 7 (02) : 197 - 212
  • [5] FRAME MODE METHOD FOR THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
    LEUNG, AYT
    WONG, WK
    [J]. THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 1988, 6 (02) : 81 - 108
  • [6] Openings in thin-walled steel structures
    Shanmugam, NE
    [J]. THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 1997, 28 (3-4) : 355 - 372
  • [7] Study on failure criterion of thin-walled steel frame structures based on the ESED parameter
    Zhang, Ming
    Xie, Xin
    Gao, Xian
    Pan, Yi
    Parke, Gerry
    [J]. THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES, 2021, 161
  • [8] Fire performance of thin-walled steel structures
    Cai, Yancheng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 174 (03) : 104 - 104
  • [9] Ductility issues in thin-walled steel structures
    Usami, T
    Zheng, Y
    Ge, HB
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STEEL STRUCTURES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 63 - 74
  • [10] Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of Clinch Connections of Thin-Walled Building Structures
    Flodr, Jakub
    Lehner, Petr
    Krejsa, Martin
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14)