Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

被引:384
|
作者
Diepeveen, Stephanie [1 ]
Ling, Tom [1 ]
Suhrcke, Marc [2 ,3 ]
Roland, Martin [3 ]
Marteau, Theresa M. [3 ]
机构
[1] RAND Europe, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ E Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Behav & Hlth Res Unit, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge, England
来源
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH | 2013年 / 13卷
关键词
Health behaviour; Attitude; Public opinion; Policy; ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE; ALCOHOL CONTROL POLICIES; SCHOOL FOOD POLICY; COMMUNITY ATTITUDES; LICENSED PREMISES; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; PORGROW PROJECT; LEGISLATIVE MEASURES; OBESITY PREVENTION; CHILDHOOD OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2458-13-756
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Governments can intervene to change health-related behaviours using various measures but are sensitive to public attitudes towards such interventions. This review describes public attitudes towards a range of policy interventions aimed at changing tobacco and alcohol use, diet, and physical activity, and the extent to which these attitudes vary with characteristics of (a) the targeted behaviour (b) the intervention and (c) the respondents. Methods: We searched electronic databases and conducted a narrative synthesis of empirical studies that reported public attitudes in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand towards interventions relating to tobacco, alcohol, diet and physical activity. Two hundred studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Over half the studies (105/200, 53%) were conducted in North America, with the most common interventions relating to tobacco control (110/200, 55%), followed by alcohol (42/200, 21%), diet-related interventions (18/200, 9%), interventions targeting both diet and physical activity (18/200, 9%), and physical activity alone (3/200, 2%). Most studies used survey-based methods (160/200, 80%), and only ten used experimental designs. Acceptability varied as a function of: (a) the targeted behaviour, with more support observed for smoking-related interventions; (b) the type of intervention, with less intrusive interventions, those already implemented, and those targeting children and young people attracting most support; and (c) the characteristics of respondents, with support being highest in those not engaging in the targeted behaviour, and with women and older respondents being more likely to endorse more restrictive measures. Conclusions: Public acceptability of government interventions to change behaviour is greatest for the least intrusive interventions, which are often the least effective, and for interventions targeting the behaviour of others, rather than the respondent him or herself. Experimental studies are needed to assess how the presentation of the problem and the benefits of intervention might increase acceptability for those interventions which are more effective but currently less acceptable.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Stephanie Diepeveen
    Tom Ling
    Marc Suhrcke
    Martin Roland
    Theresa M Marteau
    BMC Public Health, 13
  • [2] Acceptability of financial incentives for health-related behavior change: An updated systematic review
    Hoskins, Katelin
    Ulrich, Connie M.
    Shinnick, Julianna
    Buttenheim, Alison M.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 126
  • [3] Systematic review of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies of five public health-related behaviours: review protocol
    Kwasnicka, Dominika
    Kale, Dimitra
    Schneider, Verena
    Keller, Jan
    Asare, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah
    Powell, Daniel
    Naughton, Felix
    ten Hoor, Gill A.
    Verboon, Peter
    Perski, Olga
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [4] Reporting of health-related quality of life in emergency laparotomy trials: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Candice L. Downey
    J. Lessing
    D. G. Jayne
    Quality of Life Research, 2024, 33 : 599 - 605
  • [5] Reporting of health-related quality of life in emergency laparotomy trials: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Downey, Candice L.
    Lessing, J.
    Jayne, D. G.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2024, 33 (03) : 599 - 605
  • [6] Thinking Health-related Behaviors in a Climate Change Context: A Narrative Review
    Chevance, Guillaume
    Fresan, Ujue
    Hekler, Eric
    Edmondson, Donald
    Lloyd, Simon J.
    Ballester, Joan
    Litt, Jill
    Cvijanovic, Ivana
    Araujo-Soares, Vera
    Bernard, Paquito
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2023, 57 (03) : 193 - 204
  • [7] The neighbourhood built environment and health-related fitness: a narrative systematic review
    Frehlich, Levi
    Christie, Chelsea D.
    Ronksley, Paul E.
    Turin, Tanvir C.
    Doyle-Baker, Patricia
    McCormack, Gavin R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [8] The neighbourhood built environment and health-related fitness: a narrative systematic review
    Levi Frehlich
    Chelsea D. Christie
    Paul E. Ronksley
    Tanvir C. Turin
    Patricia Doyle-Baker
    Gavin R. McCormack
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19
  • [9] Compendium of dyadic intervention techniques (DITs) to change health behaviours: a systematic review
    Di Maio, Sally
    Villinger, Karoline
    Knoll, Nina
    Scholz, Urte
    Stadler, Gertraud
    Gawrilow, Caterina
    Berli, Corina
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2024, 18 (03) : 538 - 573
  • [10] Narrative interventions for health screening behaviours: A systematic review
    Perrier, Marie-Josee
    Ginis, Kathleen A. Martin
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 22 (03) : 375 - 393