Tools for Resilience Management: Multidisciplinary Development of State-and-Transition Models for Northwest Colorado

被引:13
|
作者
Kachergis, Emily J. [1 ]
Knapp, Corrine N. [2 ]
Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E. [3 ]
Ritten, John P. [4 ]
Pritchett, James G. [5 ]
Parsons, Jay [6 ]
Hibbs, Willow [7 ,8 ]
Roath, Roy [3 ]
机构
[1] Bur Land Management, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[2] Alaska Ctr Climate & Policy, Fairbanks, AK USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Forest & Rangeland Stewardship, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Univ Wyoming, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[5] Colorado State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[6] Colorado State Univ, Western Ctr Integrated Resource Management, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[7] Wyoming Game & Fish Dept, Cheyenne, WY USA
[8] USDA NRCS, Washington, DC USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2013年 / 18卷 / 04期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
adaptive management; ecology; ecosystem dynamics; knowledge integration; participatory research; rangeland; sagebrush steppe; ALTERNATE STATES; KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEMS; SCALE; AGRICULTURE; PERCEPTIONS; GOVERNANCE; RANGELANDS; FRAMEWORK; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.5751/ES-05805-180439
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Building models is an important way of integrating knowledge. Testing and updating models of social-ecological systems can inform management decisions and, ultimately, improve resilience. We report on the outcomes of a six-year, multidisciplinary model development process in the sagebrush steppe, USA. We focused on creating state-and-transition models (STMs), conceptual models of ecosystem change that represent nonlinear dynamics and are being adopted worldwide as tools for managing ecosystems. STM development occurred in four steps with four distinct sets of models: (1) local knowledge elicitation using semistructured interviews; (2) ecological data collection using an observational study; (3) model integration using participatory workshops; and (4) model simplification upon review of the literature by a multidisciplinary team. We found that different knowledge types are ultimately complementary. Many of the benefits of the STM-building process flowed from the knowledge integration steps, including improved communication, identification of uncertainties, and production of more broadly credible STMs that can be applied in diverse situations. The STM development process also generated hypotheses about sagebrush steppe dynamics that could be tested by future adaptive management and research. We conclude that multidisciplinary development of STMs has great potential for producing credible, useful tools for managing resilience of social-ecological systems. Based on this experience, we outline a streamlined, participatory STM development process that integrates multiple types of knowledge and incorporates adaptive management.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recommendations for development of resilience-based state-and-transition models
    Briske, D. D.
    Bestelmeyer, B. T.
    Stringham, T. K.
    Shaver, P. L.
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2008, 61 (04) : 359 - 367
  • [2] Development and use of state-and-transition models for rangelands
    Bestelmeyer, BT
    Brown, JR
    Havstad, KM
    Alexander, R
    Chavez, G
    Herrick, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 2003, 56 (02): : 114 - 126
  • [3] State-and-transition models in geomorphology
    Phillips, Jonathan D.
    Van Dyke, Chris
    [J]. CATENA, 2017, 153 : 168 - 181
  • [4] The use of state-and-transition models in assessing management success
    Sato, Chloe F.
    Lindenmayer, David B.
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 3 (10)
  • [5] State-and-Transition Models for Heterogeneous Landscapes: A Strategy for Development and Application
    Bestelmeyer, Brandon T.
    Tugel, Arlene J.
    Peacock, George L., Jr.
    Robinett, Daniel G.
    Sbaver, Pat L.
    Brown, Joel R.
    Herrick, Jeffrey E.
    Sanchez, Homer
    Havstad, Kris M.
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2009, 62 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [6] Spatial perspectives in state-and-transition models: a missing link to land management?
    Bestelmeyer, Brandon T.
    Goolsby, Darroc P.
    Archer, Steven R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2011, 48 (03) : 746 - 757
  • [7] Spatially Explicit Representation of State-and-Transition Models
    Steele, Caitriana M.
    Bestelmeyer, Brandon T.
    Burkett, Laura M. .
    Smith, Philip L.
    Yanoff, Steven
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 65 (03) : 213 - 222
  • [8] Generalized and Specific State-and-Transition Models to Guide Management and Restoration of Caldenal Forests
    Peinetti, H. Raul
    Bestelmeyer, Brandon T.
    Chirino, Claudia C.
    Kin, Alicia G.
    Buss, Maria E. Frank
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 72 (02) : 230 - 236
  • [9] Linking ecosystem services with state-and-transition models to evaluate rangeland management decisions
    Lohani, Sapana
    Heilman, Philip
    de Steiguer, J. Edward
    Guertin, D. Phillip
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 8 : 58 - 70
  • [10] Integrating Wildlife Count Models With State-and-Transition Models to Enhance Rangeland Management for Multiple Objectives
    Timmer, Jennifer
    Tipton, Crystal Y.
    Bruegger, Retta A.
    Augustine, David J.
    Dickey, Christopher P. K.
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    Aldridge, Cameron L.
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 78 : 15 - 25