Validation of gender difference in the Margaria-Kalamen anaerobic power test

被引:0
|
作者
Mayhew, JL
Prather, LM
McGuire, K
Ball, TE
Bowen, JC
机构
[1] Truman State Univ, Human Performance Lab, Kirksville, MO 63501 USA
[2] Kirksville Coll Osteopath Med, Dept Physiol, Kirksville, MO USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Human Performance Lab, Manhattan, KS USA
[4] No Illinois Univ, Neuromuscular Res Lab, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HUMAN MOVEMENT STUDIES | 1999年 / 36卷 / 06期
关键词
anaerobic power; gender difference; strength measurement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the significant factors contributing to the difference between men and women in anaerobic power generation. College men (n = 122) and women (n = 130) were randomly selected from a fitness class prior to training and evaluated for anaerobic power, strength and body composition. Anaerobic power was determined from the Margaria-Kalamen stair run. Dynamic strength was evaluated from the 1-RM single-leg extension (LE) and 1-RM bench press. Body composition was estimated from gender-specific skinfold prediction equations. Discriminant analysis identified %fat, fat-free mass and LE as significant components differentiating between men and women and allowed proper gender classification in 100% of the cases. When the effects of strength and body composition differences were removed as covariables, there was no significant difference between men and women in anaerobic power output (F = 0.62). The equations developed to predict anaerobic power from strength and body composition cross-validated well (r > 0.0) on a similar sample. In conclusion, muscular quantity and quality are the major factors contributing to anaerobic power production differences between untrained men and women.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 301
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE MARGARIA-KALAMEN ANAEROBIC POWER TEST - NORMS AND CORRELATES
    MAYHEW, JL
    PIPER, FC
    ETHERIDGE, GL
    SCHWEGLER, TM
    BECKENHOLDT, SE
    THOMAS, MA
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN MOVEMENT STUDIES, 1990, 18 (03): : 141 - 150
  • [2] FACTORS AFFECTING ANAEROBIC POWER OUTPUT IN THE MARGARIA-KALAMEN TEST
    HUSKEY, T
    MAYHEW, JL
    BALL, TE
    ARNOLD, MD
    ERGONOMICS, 1989, 32 (08) : 959 - 965
  • [3] DEVELOPMENT OF A MODIFIED MARGARIA-KALAMEN ANAEROBIC POWER TEST FOR AMERICAN FOOTBALL ATHLETES
    Hetzler, Ronald K.
    Vogelpohl, Rachele E.
    Stickley, Christopher D.
    Kuramoto, Allison N.
    DeLaura, Mel R.
    Kimura, Iris F.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2010, 24 (04) : 978 - 984
  • [4] BIOMECHANICAL VALIDATION OF THE MARGARIA STEP TEST
    WARD, T
    HAVRILUK, RP
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1980, 12 (02): : 95 - 95
  • [5] Contributions of strength and body composition to the gender difference in anaerobic power
    Mayhew, JL
    Hancock, K
    Rollison, L
    Ball, TE
    Bowen, JC
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2001, 41 (01): : 33 - 38
  • [6] No Difference In Power Output For Seated Versus Standing Position During Wingate Anaerobic Power Test
    Potteiger, Jeffrey A.
    Hamm, Jacob
    Walsh, Mark
    Smith, Dean
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2012, 44 : 428 - 428
  • [7] Gender, power and difference
    Epstein, Debbie
    Renold, Emma
    GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2006, 18 (03) : 229 - 231
  • [8] Comparison Of The Wingate Anaerobic Test And The New Power Bike Test On Anaerobic Power
    Lee, Sukho
    Seo, Kyoungho
    Ko, Jungbo
    Kim, Jiyeon
    Martinez, Jonathan
    Trinh, Cindy
    Miller, Michael
    Choi, Hyejung
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2020, 52 (07) : 41 - 41
  • [9] Introduction: Gender, Power, and Difference
    Beattie, Cordelia
    INTERSECTIONS OF GENDER, RELIGION AND ETHNICITY IN THE MIDDLE AGES, 2011, : 1 - 11
  • [10] GENDER DIFFERENCES IN ANAEROBIC POWER TESTS
    MAYHEW, JL
    SALM, PC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 60 (02) : 133 - 138