Magnetic resonance imaging of normal meningeal enhancement at 1.5 T

被引:12
|
作者
Quint, DJ
Eldevik, OP
Cohen, JK
机构
关键词
brain magnetic resonance imaging; contrast enhancement; gadolinium chelate; gadopentetate dimeglumine;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80002-X
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. We examined patterns of intracranial meningeal enhancement on gadolinium chelate contrast media-enhanced 1.5-T spin-echo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and developed criteria that might be useful for distinguishing between normal and abnormal meningeal enhancement. Methods. The convexity, fair cerebri, tentorium cerebelli, and suprasellar cistern regions of 204 patients were prospectively evaluated for contrast enhancement with a grading system ranging from 0 (no enhancement) to 5 (diffuse, irregular, thickened enhancement). Meningeal findings were correlated with other MR abnormalities and pertinent clinical histories that have been associated previously with meningeal enhancement. Results. Short-segment convexity meningeal enhancement was commonly seen and most likely represents intravascular contrast material in normal meningeal vessels. Such enhancement did not correlate with the presence of other MR abnormalities. Long-segment (>3 cm) or diffuse convexity meningeal enhancement did correlate with other significant MR abnormalities and pertinent clinical history, Fine linear falcine and tentorial meningeal enhancement, as an isolated finding, did not correlate with other MR or clinical abnormalities. The suprasellar cistern and ventricular walls were rarely enhanced. Conclusion. Short-segment convexity meningeal contrast enhancement is a normal finding representing normal vascular structures. More extensive convexity meningeal enhancement is abnormal and should prompt careful examination of the remainder of an MR image as well as the patient's clinical history for an etiology of the enhancement.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 468
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PATTERNS OF NORMAL MENINGEAL ENHANCEMENT AT 1.5-T MR-IMAGING
    QUINT, DJ
    COHEN, JK
    ELDEVIK, OP
    RADIOLOGY, 1995, 197 : 489 - 490
  • [2] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE NORMAL PROSTATE AT 1.5-T
    GEVENOIS, PA
    SALMON, I
    STALLENBERG, B
    VANSINOY, ML
    VANREGEMORTER, G
    STRUYVEN, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1990, 63 (746): : 101 - 107
  • [3] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING DEMONSTRATION OF MENINGEAL CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT
    MCKINSTRY, S
    GUILLEUX, MH
    BYDDER, GM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1986, 59 (704): : 818 - 818
  • [4] Meningeal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging in 15 dogs and 3 cats
    Mellema, LM
    Samii, VF
    Vernau, KM
    LeCouteur, RA
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2002, 43 (01) : 10 - 15
  • [5] Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Placenta at 1.5 Tesla (T).
    Wright, Caroline
    Morris, David M.
    Baker, Philip N.
    Crocker, Ian P.
    Gowland, Penny A.
    Parker, Geoff J.
    Sibley, Colin P.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 16 (03) : 348A - 348A
  • [6] Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty at 1.5 T
    Koff, Matthew F.
    Burge, Alissa J.
    Potter, Hollis G.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (07) : 1455 - 1464
  • [7] TRAUMATIC SUBDURAL HYGROMA - PATHOLOGY AND MENINGEAL ENHANCEMENT ON MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    HASEGAWA, M
    YAMASHIMA, T
    YAMASHITA, J
    SUZUKI, M
    SHIMADA, S
    HORWITZ, NH
    DAVIS, DH
    NEUROSURGERY, 1992, 31 (03) : 580 - 585
  • [8] Intracranial hypotension without meningeal enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging - Case report
    Schievink, WI
    Tourje, J
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2000, 92 (03) : 475 - 477
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T After Cochlear Implantation
    Crane, Benjamin T.
    Gottschalk, Barbara
    Kraut, Michael
    Aygun, Nafi
    Niparko, John K.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) : 1215 - 1220