Enhanced Unblocking From Sustained Post-Trial Surprise

被引:2
|
作者
Haselgrove, Mark [1 ]
Tam, Shu K. E. [2 ]
Jones, Peter M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Lab Ophthalmol, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[3] Staffordshire Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Stoke On Trent ST4 2DE, Staffs, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
blocking; unblocking; attention; associability; surprise; WITHIN-COMPOUND ASSOCIATIONS; BLOCKING; ATTENUATION; INHIBITION; ATTENTION; MODEL; REINFORCER; OMISSION; CS;
D O I
10.1037/a0032569
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two appetitive conditioning experiments with rats investigated the mechanisms and properties of unblocking that results from the surprising omission of an expected post-trial unconditioned stimulus (US). Experiment 1 demonstrated unblocking under circumstances in which differences in the contribution of generalization decrement and within-compound associations are equated across experimental and control groups. Following Stage 1 training in which a conditioned stimulus (CS) A was followed by a US and a post-trial US, in Experiment 2 we arranged for the post-trial US to be present on some trials with AX but not others. Under these circumstances an enhancement of unblocking to X was observed, relative to a group who received standard unblocking by US omission. The implications of these results for attentional and US-processing theories of associative learning are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 322
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REINFORCER SPECIFICITY IN THE ENHANCEMENT OF CONDITIONING BY POST-TRIAL SURPRISE
    DICKINSON, A
    MACKINTOSH, NJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1979, 5 (02): : 162 - 177
  • [2] Post-trial responsibilities beyond post-trial access
    Cho, Hae Lin
    Danis, Marion
    Grady, Christine
    [J]. LANCET, 2018, 391 (10129): : 1478 - 1479
  • [3] AVOIDANCE-LEARNING ENHANCED BY POST-TRIAL MORPHINE INJECTION
    STAUBLI, U
    HUSTON, JP
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1980, 28 (04): : 487 - 490
  • [4] Estimated legacy effects from simulated post-trial data were less biased than from combined trial/post-trial data
    Zhu, Lin
    Bell, Katy J. L.
    Hayen, Andrew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 114 : 30 - 37
  • [5] LEARNING AND POST-TRIAL PROCESSING
    DICKINSON, A
    COLWILL, RM
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1981, 2 (02) : 255 - 256
  • [6] Pre-trial, trial, and post-trial procedure
    Quigley, T
    [J]. TOWARDS A CLEAR AND JUST CRIMINAL LAW: A CRIMINAL REPORTS FORUM, 1999, : 253 - 371
  • [7] Now what? The post-trial GOP
    Shribman, D
    [J]. FORTUNE, 1999, 139 (05) : 54 - 54
  • [8] IMPROVEMENT OF RETENTION BY POST-TRIAL MORPHINE
    MONDADORI, C
    WASER, PG
    [J]. EXPERIENTIA, 1978, 34 (07): : 902 - 902
  • [9] Are Post-Trial Observational Studies Useful?
    Heerspink, Hiddo J. Lambers
    de Zeeuw, Dick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 25 (10): : 2148 - 2150
  • [10] Post-Trial Enhanced Deployment and Technical Performance with the MISTIE Procedure per Lessons Learned
    Mansour, Ali
    Loggini, Andrea
    El Ammar, Faten
    Alvarado-Dyer, Ronald
    Polster, Sean
    Stadnik, Agnieszka
    Das, Paramita
    Warnke, Peter C.
    Yamini, Bakhtiar
    Lazaridis, Christos
    Kramer, Christopher
    Mould, W. Andrew
    Hildreth, Meghan
    Sharrock, Matthew
    Hanley, Daniel F.
    Goldenberg, Fernando D.
    Awad, Issam A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 30 (09):