Is There a Relationship Between Lumbar Proprioception and Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

被引:128
|
作者
Tong, Matthew Hoyan [1 ]
Mousavi, Seyed Javad [1 ]
Kiers, Henri [2 ]
Ferreira, Paulo [1 ]
Refshauge, Kathryn [1 ]
van Dieen, Jaap [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Arthrit & Musculoskeletal Res Grp, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Fac Hlth Care, Res Grp Lifestyle & Hlth, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Human Movement Sci, MOVE Res Inst Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Low back pain; Proprioception; Rehabilitation; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TRUNK MUSCLE-ACTIVITY; POSITION SENSE; REPOSITIONING ERROR; INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTIONS; HYPERTONIC SALINE; SPINE KINESTHESIA; PRECISION CONTROL; SITTING POSTURES; HEALTHY CONTROLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.016
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To systematically review the relationship between lumbar proprioception and low back pain (LBP). Data Sources: Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus) and reference lists of relevant articles were searched from inception to March-April 2014. Study Selection: Studies compared lumbar proprioception in patients with LBP with controls or prospectively evaluated the relationship between proprioception and LBP. Two reviewers independently screened articles and determined inclusion through consensus. Data Extraction: Data extraction and methodologic quality assessment were independently performed using standardized checklists. Data Synthesis: Twenty-two studies (1203 participants) were included. Studies measured lumbar proprioception via active or passive joint repositioning sense (JRS) or threshold to detection of passive motion (TTDPM). Data from 17 studies were pooled for meta-analyses to compare patients with controls. Otherwise, descriptive syntheses were performed. Data were analyzed according to measurement method and LBP subgroup. Active JRS was worse in patients compared with controls when measured in sitting (standard mean difference, .97; 95% confidence interval [CI], .31-1.64). There were no differences between groups measured via active IRS in standing (standard mean difference, .41; 95% CI, -.07 to.89) or passive JRS in sitting (standard mean difference, .38; 95% CI, -.83 to 1.58). Patients in the O'Sullivan flexion impairment subgroup had worse proprioception than the total LBP cohort. The TTDPM was significantly worse in patients than controls. One prospective study found no link between lumbar proprioception and LBP. Conclusions: Patients with LBP have impaired lumbar proprioception compared with controls when measured actively in sitting positions (particularly those in the O'Sullivan flexion impairment subgroup) or via TTDPM. Clinicians should consider the relationship between sitting and proprioception in LBP and subgroup patients to guide management. Further studies focusing on subgroups, longitudinal assessment, and improving proprioception measurement are needed. (C) 2016 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 136
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The relationships between low back pain and lumbar lordosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chun, Se-Woong
    Lim, Chai-Young
    Kim, Keewon
    Hwang, Jinseub
    Chung, Sun G.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (08): : 1180 - 1191
  • [2] The association between lumbar spine radiographic features and low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Raastad, Joachim
    Reiman, Michael
    Coeytaux, Remy
    Ledbetter, Leila
    Goode, Adam P.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2015, 44 (05) : 571 - 585
  • [3] To Flex or Not to Flex? Is There a Relationship Between Lumbar Spine Flexion During Lifting and Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis
    Saraceni, Nic
    Kent, Peter
    Ng, Leo
    Campbell, Amity
    Straker, Leon
    O'Sullivan, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 50 (03): : 121 - +
  • [4] Anticonvulsants in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar radicular pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Enke, Oliver
    New, Heather A.
    New, Charles H.
    Mathieson, Stephanie
    McLachlan, Andrew J.
    Latimer, Jane
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Lin, C. -W. Christine
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 190 (26) : E786 - E793
  • [5] Relationship between physical activity and disability in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
    McAuley, James H.
    Macedo, Luciana
    Barnett, Dominique C.
    Smeets, Rob J.
    Verbunt, Jeanine A.
    [J]. PAIN, 2011, 152 (03) : 607 - 613
  • [6] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Yoga for Low Back Pain
    Cramer, Holger
    Lauche, Romy
    Haller, Heidemarie
    Dobos, Gustav
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 29 (05): : 450 - 460
  • [7] Prevention of Low Back Pain A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Steffens, Daniel
    Maher, Chris G.
    Pereira, Leani S. M.
    Stevens, Matthew L.
    Oliveira, Vinicius C.
    Chapple, Meredith
    Teixeira-Salmela, Luci F.
    Hancock, Mark J.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 176 (02) : 199 - 208
  • [8] Relationship between psychological factors and spinal motor behaviour in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Christe, Guillaume
    Crombez, Geert
    Edd, Shannon
    Opsommer, Emmanuelle
    Jolles, Brigitte M.
    Favre, Julien
    [J]. PAIN, 2021, 162 (03) : 672 - 686
  • [9] Association between sedentary behavior and low back pain; A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mahdavi, Sadegh Baradaran
    Riahi, Roya
    Vahdatpour, Babak
    Kelishadi, Roya
    [J]. HEALTH PROMOTION PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 11 (04): : 393 - 410
  • [10] Lumbar Tactile Acuity in Patients With Low Back Pain and Healthy Controls: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Adamczyk, Waclaw
    Luedtke, Kerstin
    Saulicz, Edward
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 34 (01): : 82 - 94