Mechanisms and effects of public reporting of surgeon outcomes: A systematic review of the literature

被引:14
|
作者
Behrendt, Katja [1 ]
Groene, Oliver [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London, England
[2] Optimedis AG, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Surgeons; Outcome assessment; Public reporting; Quality of health care; Quality improvement; Task performance and analysis; NEW-YORK-STATE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ARTERY-BYPASS-SURGERY; HEALTH-CARE INFORMATION; CARDIAC-SURGERY; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE REPORTS; QUALITY; MORTALITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.08.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Public reporting of surgeon outcomes has become a key strategy in the English NHS to ensure accountability and improve the quality of care. Much of the evidence that supported the design of the strategy originates from the USA. This report aims to assess how the evidence on public reporting could be harnessed for cross-country translation of this health system strategy; in particular, to gauge the expected results of the UK surgeon outcome initiative and to propose criteria that elucidate that prerequisites and factors that are needed to public reporting effective. Methods: A systematic search of academic databases was followed by snowballing from the reference lists. Only peer-reviewed articles and primary studies were included. Results: 25 studies from the USA (n = 22) and the UK (n = 3) were included. Suggestive evidence of a negative effect on access to surgery was found for high-risk patients and non-whites; one survey indicated presence of gaming. There was anecdotal evidence of quality improvement measures adopted by low-rated hospitals in New York. Most studies reported only on the effectiveness of public reporting, rather than addressing how effects accrue. This limits cross-country transferability of policy lessons. Based on our analysis, we propose factors impacting on the transferability of the evidence underlying the public reporting of surgeon outcomes, which may inform the adoption of this strategy in other health systems. Conclusions: There is some evidence that public reporting can be an incentive for low performing surgeons to improve quality. Negative incentive on patient selection as suggested in the USA have not yet been observed in the UK. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1161
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of fatigue on surgeon performance and surgical outcomes: a systematic review
    Sturm, Lana
    Dawson, Drew
    Vaughan, Richard
    Hewett, Peter
    Hill, Andrew G.
    Graham, John C.
    Maddern, Guy J.
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 81 (7-8) : 502 - 509
  • [2] Can public reporting impact patient outcomes and disparities? A systematic review
    Berger, Zackary D.
    Joy, Susan M.
    Hutfless, Susan
    Bridges, John F. P.
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2013, 93 (03) : 480 - 487
  • [3] Mechanisms of Network Formation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Siciliano, Michael D.
    Wang, Weijie
    Medina, Alejandra
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON PUBLIC MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, 2021, 4 (01) : 63 - 81
  • [4] Effect of surgeon-specific feedback on surgical outcomes: a systematic review of the literature
    Lingard, Morgan C. H.
    Teo, Yahsze
    Frampton, Christopher M. A.
    Hooper, Gary J.
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 94 (1-2) : 47 - 56
  • [5] Public reporting of surgeon outcomes in the United Kingdom: Potential caveats
    Khajuria, Ankur
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 (04) : 369 - 370
  • [6] The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Campanella, Paolo
    Vukovic, Vladimir
    Parente, Paolo
    Sulejmani, Adela
    Ricciardi, Walter
    Specchia, Maria Lucia
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2016, 16
  • [7] The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Paolo Campanella
    Vladimir Vukovic
    Paolo Parente
    Adela Sulejmani
    Walter Ricciardi
    Maria Lucia Specchia
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 16
  • [8] Effect of Surgeon Training, Specialization, and Experience on Outcomes for Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Phillips, Joseph D.
    Rock, Colin E.
    Hayman, Amanda
    Prystowsky, Jay B.
    Bentrem, David J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) : 1799 - 1808
  • [9] Effect of Surgeon Training, Specialization, and Experience on Outcomes for Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Karl Y. Bilimoria
    Joseph D. Phillips
    Colin E. Rock
    Amanda Hayman
    Jay B. Prystowsky
    David J. Bentrem
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2009, 16 : 1799 - 1808
  • [10] Appreciations, criticisms, determinants, and effects of integrated reporting: A systematic literature review
    Vitolla, Filippo
    Raimo, Nicola
    Rubino, Michele
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (02) : 518 - 528