Effects of prepartum intramammary antibiotic therapy on udder health, milk production, and reproductive performance in dairy heifers

被引:55
|
作者
Borm, A. A.
Fox, L. K. [1 ]
Leslie, K. E.
Hogan, J. S.
Andrew, S. M.
Moyes, K. M.
Oliver, S. P.
Schukken, Y. H.
Hancock, D. D.
Gaskins, C. T.
Owens, W. E.
Norman, C.
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Univ Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[4] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[5] Univ Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[6] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[7] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[8] Louisiana State Univ, Dairy Res & Extens Ctr, Homer, LA 71040 USA
关键词
mastitis; antibiotic treatment; heifer; health;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72279-2
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Preparturient heifers (n = 561) from 9 herds in 6 US states and 1 Canadian province were enrolled in a study to test the hypothesis that prepartum intramammary therapy would cure existing intramammary infections (IMI) and lead to increased milk production, reduced linear somatic cell count (LSCC), and improved reproductive performance. Mammary secretions were collected 10 to 21 d before expected calving from each quarter. Heifers were then assigned by identification number to receive intramammary therapy consisting of infusion of one tube per mammary quarter of a lactating cow commercial antibiotic preparation containing cephapirin or to a nontreated control group. Overall, 34.1% of mammary quarters were infected with a mastitis pathogen before parturition and 63.4% of heifers had at least one mammary quarter infected. The coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) caused the majority (74.8%) of prepartum IMI. Coagulase-positive staphylococci, environmental streptococci, and coliforms accounted for 24.5% of prepartum infections. Treatment had a significant effect on the cure rate of infected mammary quarters. Mammary quarters that were infected prepartum and treated with antibiotics had a 59.5% efficacy of cure rate and the percentage reduction in heifers with IMI was 51.9. Control quarters had a spontaneous cure rate of 31.7%. Treatment did not significantly affect milk production or LSCC in the first 200 d of lactation; however, there was a significant treatment by herd interaction for milk production. Quarters cured of either CNS or major pathogens had a lower LSCC in the first 200 d of lactation. No significant effect on services per conception or days open between treatment and control groups was observed. This trial demonstrated that prepartum intramammary antibiotic therapy did reduce the number of heifer IMI postpartum. Milk production, LSCC, and reproductive performance during the first 200 d of the first lactation were not significantly affected by treatment. Given these results, use of prepartum intramammary antibiotic therapy in heifers as a universal strategy to increase milk production in first-lactation dairy cows may not be warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:2090 / 2098
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prepartum intramammary antibiotic therapy: Effects on udder health, milk production, and reproductive performance in dairy heifers
    Borm, AA
    Fox, LK
    Leslie, KE
    Hogan, JS
    Andrew, SM
    Oliver, SP
    Schukken, YH
    Hancock, DD
    Gaskins, CT
    Owens, WE
    Norman, C
    [J]. Mastitis in Dairy Production: CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND FUTURE SOLUTIONS, 2005, : 364 - 369
  • [2] Effect of prepartum dry cow antibiotic treatment in dairy heifers on udder health and milk production
    Sampimon, O. C.
    De Vliegher, S.
    Barkema, H. W.
    Sol, J.
    Lam, T. J. G. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (09) : 4395 - 4403
  • [3] Prepartum intramammary antibiotic therapy: Effect on risk of antibiotic residues in milk from dairy heifers
    Steinman, KJ
    Andrew, SM
    Borm, AA
    Fox, LK
    Leslie, KE
    Hogan, JS
    Oliver, SP
    Schukken, YH
    Owens, WE
    Norman, C
    [J]. Mastitis in Dairy Production: CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND FUTURE SOLUTIONS, 2005, : 688 - 693
  • [4] Impact of intramammary infections in dairy heifers on future udder health, milk production, and culling
    Piepers, S.
    De Vliegher, S.
    de Kruif, A.
    Opsomer, G.
    Barkema, H. W.
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 134 (1-2) : 113 - 120
  • [5] Prepartum application of internal teat sealant or intramammary amoxicillin on dairy heifers: Effect on udder health, survival, and performance
    Machado, V. S.
    Bicalho, R. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (02) : 1388 - 1402
  • [6] Effects of prepartum milking on postpartum reproduction, udder health and production performance in first-calf dairy heifers
    Bowers, Susan
    Gandy, Scott
    Graves, Kenneth
    Eicher, Susan
    Willard, Scott
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2006, 73 (03) : 257 - 263
  • [7] Longitudinal study on the effects of intramammary infection with non-aureus staphylococci on udder health and milk production in dairy heifers
    Valckenier, D.
    Piepers, S.
    Schukken, Y. H.
    De Visscher, A.
    Boyen, F.
    Haesebrouck, F.
    De Vliegher, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (01) : 899 - 914
  • [8] Factors associated with the risk of antibiotic residues and intramammary pathogen presence in milk from heifers administered prepartum intramammary antibiotic therapy
    Andrew, S. M.
    Moyes, K. M.
    Borm, A. A.
    Fox, L. K.
    Leslie, K. E.
    Hogan, J. S.
    Oliver, S. P.
    Schukken, Y. H.
    Owens, W. E.
    Norman, C.
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 134 (1-2) : 150 - 156
  • [9] Prepartum antibiotic treatment of heifers: Milk production, milk quality and economic benefit
    Oliver, SP
    Lewis, MJ
    Gillespie, BE
    Dowlen, HH
    Jaenicke, EC
    Roberts, RK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2003, 86 (04) : 1187 - 1193
  • [10] Effect of prepartum intramammary treatment of heifers on somatic cell count, milk production and mastitis postpartum
    McCarthy, K. K.
    Kreft, R. A.
    Sears, P. M.
    [J]. Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual Conference of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners, 2005, : 175 - 176