Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks

被引:185
|
作者
Distinguin, Isabelle [1 ]
Roulet, Caroline [2 ]
Tarazi, Amine [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Limoges, LAPE, F-87031 Limoges, France
[2] OECD, 2 Rue Andre Pascal, F-75116 Paris, France
关键词
Bank regulatory capital; Liquidity; Bank regulation; BUFFER; RISK; RUNS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.027
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The theory of financial intermediation highlights various channels through which capital and liquidity are interrelated. Using a simultaneous equations framework, we investigate the relationship between bank regulatory capital and bank liquidity measured from on-balance sheet positions for European and US publicly traded commercial banks. Previous research studying the determinants of bank capital buffer has neglected the role of liquidity. On the whole, we find that banks decrease their regulatory capital ratios when they face higher illiquidity as defined in the Basel III accords or when they create more liquidity as measured by Berger and Bouwman (2009). However, considering other measures of illiquidity that focus more closely on core deposits in the United States, our results show that small banks strengthen their solvency standards when they are exposed to higher illiquidity. Our empirical investigation supports the need to implement minimum liquidity ratios concomitant to capital ratios, as stressed by the Basel Committee; however, our findings also shed light on the need to further clarify how to define and measure illiquidity and also on how to regulate large banking institutions, which behave differently than smaller ones. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3295 / 3317
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Liquidity and capital in bank lending: Evidence from European banks
    Thornton, John
    di Tommaso, Caterina
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 34
  • [2] Bank opacity, intermediation cost and globalization: Evidence from a sample of publicly traded banks in Asia
    Soedarmono, Wahyoe
    Tarazi, Amine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2013, 29 : 91 - 100
  • [3] Are regulatory capital adequacy ratios good indicators of bank failure? Evidence from US banks
    Abou-El-Sood, Heba
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2016, 48 : 292 - 302
  • [4] Bank regulatory capital and liquidity creation: evidence from BRICS countries
    Umar, Muhammad
    Sun, Gang
    Shahzad, Khurram
    Rao, Zia-ur-Rehman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2018, 13 (01) : 218 - 230
  • [5] DOES RAISING BANK CAPITAL LIMIT BANK LIQUIDITY CREATION? EVIDENCE FROM COMMERCIAL BANKS IN VIETNAM
    Pham, Xuan Thanh Thi
    Ho, Tin Huu
    Nguyen, Ha Thai Tran
    Ngo, Thanh Phu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EASTERN EUROPEAN AND CENTRAL ASIAN RESEARCH, 2022, 9 (04): : 593 - 604
  • [6] Is bank misconduct related to social capital? Evidence from US banks
    Martin-Flores, Jose M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2024, 167
  • [7] Capital, liquidity, and profitability in European banks
    Adelopo, Ismail
    Vichou, Nikolina
    Cheung, Kwok Yip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 33 (01): : 23 - 35
  • [8] The effect of leverage and liquidity on earnings and capital management: Evidence from US commercial banks
    Gombola, Michael J.
    Ho, Amy Yueh-Fang
    Huang, Chin-Chuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2016, 43 : 35 - 58
  • [9] Internal regulatory technology (RegTech) and bank liquidity risk: evidence from Chinese listed banks
    Xia, Yufei
    Lu, Xuyan
    Hao, Ziming
    Shi, Huiyi
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024,
  • [10] The Role of Capital and Liquidity in Bank Lending: Are Banks Safer?
    Polizzi, Salvatore
    Scannella, Enzo
    Suarez, Nuria
    [J]. GLOBAL POLICY, 2020, 11 : 28 - 38