Strength training versus robot-assisted gait training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized pilot study in patients depending on walking assistance

被引:85
|
作者
Labruyere, Rob [1 ,2 ]
van Hedel, Hubertus J. A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Balgrist Univ Hosp, Spinal Cord Injury Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Human Movement Sci & Sport, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Childrens Hosp Zurich, Rehabil Ctr, Pediat Rehab Res Grp, Affoltern Am Albis, Switzerland
关键词
Rehabilitation; Spinal lesion; Training study; Paraplegia; Lokomat; Randomized clinical trial; Walking; Pain; BODY-WEIGHT SUPPORT; INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; CHRONIC STROKE; LOCOMOTOR; REHABILITATION; INDIVIDUALS; PERFORMANCE; INTENSITY; VALIDITY; BALANCE;
D O I
10.1186/1743-0003-11-4
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Task-specific locomotor training has been promoted to improve walking-related outcome after incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI). However, there is also evidence that lower extremity strength training might lead to such improvements. The aim of this randomized cross-over pilot study was to compare changes in a broad spectrum of walking-related outcome measures and pain between robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) and strength training in patients with chronic iSCI, who depended on walking assistance. We hypothesized that task-specific locomotor training would result in better improvements compared to strength training. Methods: Nine participants with a chronic iSCI were randomized to group 1 or 2. Group 1 received 16 sessions of RAGT (45 min each) within 4 weeks followed by 16 sessions of strength training (45 min each) within 4 weeks. Group 2 received the same interventions in reversed order. Main outcome measures were the 10 m Walk Test (10MWT) at preferred and maximal speed. Furthermore, we assessed several measures such as walking speed under different conditions, balance, strength, and 2 questionnaires that evaluate risk of falling and pain. Data were collected at baseline, between interventions after 4 weeks, directly after the interventions and at follow-up 6 months after the interventions. Pain was assessed repeatedly throughout the study. Results: There were no significant differences in changes in scores between the 2 interventions, except for maximal walking speed (10MWT), which improved significantly more after strength training than after RAGT. Pain reduced after both interventions. Conclusion: In patients with chronic iSCI dependent on walking assistance, RAGT was not more effective in improving walking-related outcome compared to lower extremity strength training. However, the low sample size limits generalizability and precision of data interpretation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strength training versus robot-assisted gait training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized pilot study in patients depending on walking assistance
    Rob Labruyère
    Hubertus J A van Hedel
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11
  • [2] Non-invasive brain stimulation and robot-assisted gait training after incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized pilot study
    Raithatha, Ravi
    Carrico, Cheryl
    Powell, Elizabeth Salmon
    Westgate, Philip M.
    Chelette, Kenneth C., II
    Lee, Kara
    Dunsmore, Laura
    Salles, Sara
    Sawaki, Lumy
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2016, 38 (01) : 15 - 25
  • [3] Robot-Assisted Gait Training for Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
    Ozbudak Demir, Sibel
    TURKIYE FIZIKSEL TIP VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 61 : S37 - S44
  • [4] Effects of robot-assisted gait training on lower extremity strength, functional independence, and walking function in men with incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury
    Midik, Melike
    Paker, Nurdan
    Bugdayci, Derya
    Midik, Ali Can
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 66 (01): : 54 - 59
  • [5] ROBOT-ASSISTED LOCOMOTOR TRAINING DID NOT IMPROVE WALKING FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INCOMPLETE SPINAL CORD INJURY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
    Piira, Anu
    Lannem, Anne M.
    Sorensen, Marit
    Glott, Thomas
    Knutsen, Raymond
    Jorgensen, Lone
    Gjesdal, Knut
    Hjeltnes, Nils
    Knutsen, Synnove F.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (05) : 385 - 389
  • [6] Hybrid gait training with an overground robot for people with incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study
    del-Ama, Antonio J.
    Gil-Agudo, Angel
    Pons, Jose L.
    Moreno, Juan C.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [7] Robot Assisted Gait Training in complete spinal cord injury patients
    Stampacchia, G.
    Mazzoleni, S.
    Rustici, A.
    Bigazzi, S.
    Gerini, A.
    D'Avino, C.
    Battini, E.
    Franchini, A.
    Tombini, T.
    44TH CONGRESSO NAZIONALE SIMFER, 2017, : 91 - 93
  • [8] Effects of end-effector robot-assisted gait training on gait ability, muscle strength, and balance in patients with spinal cord injury
    Shin, Ji Cheol
    Jeon, Ha Ra
    Kim, Dahn
    Min, Won Kyu
    Lee, June Sung
    Cho, Sung Il
    Oh, Da Som
    Yoo, Jeehyun
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2023, 53 (03) : 335 - 346
  • [9] EFFECTIVENESS OF ROBOT-ASSISTED GAIT TRAINING IN PERSONS WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Swinnen, Eva
    Duerinck, Saartje
    Baeyens, Jean-Pierre
    Meeusen, Romain
    Kerckhofs, Eric
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2010, 42 (06) : 520 - 526
  • [10] Robot-assisted gait training (Lokomat) improves walking function and activity in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review
    Nam, Ki Yeun
    Kim, Hyun Jung
    Kwon, Bum Sun
    Park, Jin-Woo
    Lee, Ho Jun
    Yoo, Aeri
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 14