Comprehensive analysis of TP53 and SPOP mutations and their impact on survival in metastatic prostate cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Zhou, Jie [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Yiming [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Shengmeng [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Chen [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yongming [1 ,2 ]
Li, Lingfeng [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Hai [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Zhenghui [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Dept Urol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Guangdong Prov Clin Res Ctr Urol Dis, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
metastatic prostate cancer; TP53; SPOP; prognosis; biomarkers; mutation; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2022.957404
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundAlthough TP53 and SPOP are frequently mutated in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), their prognostic value is ambiguous, and large sample studies are lacking, especially when they co-occur with other genetic alterations. MethodsGenomic data and patients' clinical characteristics in PCa were downloaded from the cBioPortal database. We extensively analyzed other gene alterations in different mutation status of TP53 and SPOP. We further subdivided TP53 and SPOP mutation into subgroups based on different mutation status, and then evaluated the prognostic value. Two classification systems for TP53 survival analysis were used. ResultsA total of 2,172 patients with PCa were analyzed in our study, of which 1,799 were metastatic PCa patients. The mutual exclusivity analysis showed that TP53 and SPOP mutation has a strong mutual exclusion (p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, truncating TP53 mutations (HR=1.773, 95%CI:1.403-2.239, p<0.001) and other TP53 mutations(HR=1.555, 95%CI:1.267-1.908, p<0.001) were independent negative prognostic markers in metastatic PCa, whereas SPOP mutations(HR=0.592, 95%CI:0.427-0.819, p<0.001) were an independent prognostic factor for better prognosis. Mutations in TP53 were significantly associated with wild-type status for SPOP and CDK12, structural variants/fusions for TMPRSS2 and ERG, AR amplification and PTEN deletion (p<0.001). And truncating TP53 mutations have higher AR amplification rates than other TP53 mutations (p=0.022). Consistently, truncating TP53 mutations had a worse prognosis than other TP53 mutations (p<0.05). Then Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that Co-occurring TP53 mutations in AR amplification or PTEN deletion tumors significantly reduced survival (p<0.05). Furthermore, those with SPOP-mutant tumors with co-occurring TP53 truncating mutations had shorter overall survival than those with SPOP-mutant tumors with wild-type or other TP53 mutations. ConclusionsThis study found that TP53 and SPOP mutations were mutually exclusive and both were independent prognostic markers for metastatic PCa. Genomic alteration and survival analysis revealed that TP53 and SPOP mutations represented distinct molecular subtypes. Our data suggest that molecular stratification on the basis of TP53 and SPOP mutation status should be implemented for metastatic PCa to optimize and modify clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Deciphering the Increased Prevalence of TP53 Mutations in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Zhang, Wensheng
    Dong, Yan
    Sartor, Oliver
    Zhang, Kun
    CANCER INFORMATICS, 2022, 21
  • [2] Deciphering the Increased Prevalence of TP53 Mutations in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
    Zhang, Wensheng
    Dong, Yan
    Sartor, Oliver
    Zhang, Kun
    CANCER INFORMATICS, 2022, 21
  • [3] TP53 GENE MUTATIONS IN PROSTATE CANCER PROGRESSION
    Ecke, Th. H.
    Schlechte, H. H.
    Schiemenz, K.
    Sachs, M. D.
    Lenk, S. V.
    Rudolph, B. D.
    Loening, S. A.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 28 (6B) : 4055 - 4056
  • [4] TP53 Gene Mutations in Prostate Cancer Progression
    Ecke, Thorsten H.
    Schlechte, Horst H.
    Schiemenz, Katrin
    Sachs, Markus D.
    Lenk, Severin V.
    Rudolph, Birgit D.
    Loening, Stefan A.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 30 (05) : 1579 - 1586
  • [5] Analysis of TP53 gain of function mutations in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
    Sweeney, Patrick L.
    Lanka, Sree M.
    Jang, Albert
    Gupta, Kanika
    Caputo, Sydney
    Casado, Crystal
    Huang, Minqi
    Pocha, Olivia
    Hawkins, Maddie
    Lieberman, Alexandra
    Schwartz, Jennifer
    Jaeger, Ellen B.
    Miller, Patrick
    Barata, Pedro C.
    Layton, Jodi Lyn
    Lewis, Brian E.
    Ledet, Elisa M.
    Sartor, A. Oliver
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41
  • [6] Impact of TP53 mutations in breast cancer: Clinicopathological features and prognosisImpact of TP53 mutations in breast CA
    Li, Xuerui
    Chen, Xiaoqing
    Wen, Lingzhu
    Wang, Yulei
    Chen, Bo
    Xue, Yunlian
    Guo, Liping
    Liao, Ning
    THORACIC CANCER, 2020, 11 (07) : 1861 - 1868
  • [7] TP53 mutations and Their Impact on Survival in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
    Rolles, Benjamin
    De Oliveira Filho, Cilomar Martins
    Keating, Julia
    Luskin, Marlise R.
    DeAngelo, Daniel J.
    Lindsley, Coleman
    Kim, Annette S.
    Hem, Jessica
    Kim, Chulwoo J.
    Weeks, Lachelle D.
    Wazir, Mohammed
    How, Joan
    Marneth, Anna E.
    Liu, Yiwen
    Aryee, Martin J.
    Tsai, Harrison K.
    Stahl, Maximilian
    Mullally, Ann
    BLOOD, 2023, 142
  • [8] The Impact of TP53 Mutations and Use of the TP53Mutation-Reactivating Agent APR-246 on Metastatic Castrate-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
    Hoang, T.
    Sutera, P.
    Nguyen, T.
    Chang, J. H.
    Jagtap, S.
    Song, Y.
    Shetty, A.
    Chowdhury, D. D.
    Chan, A.
    Carrieri, F. A. A.
    Song, D.
    DeWeese, T. L.
    Lafargue, A.
    Van der Eecken, K.
    Bunz, F.
    Ost, P.
    Tran, P. T.
    Deek, M. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E443 - E443
  • [9] The impact of TP53 mutations and TP53 deletions on survival varies between AML, ALL, MDS and CLL: an analysis of 3307 cases
    Stengel, A.
    Kern, W.
    Haferlach, T.
    Meggendorfer, M.
    Fasan, A.
    Haferlach, C.
    LEUKEMIA, 2017, 31 (03) : 705 - 711
  • [10] The impact of TP53 mutations and TP53 deletions on survival varies between AML, ALL, MDS and CLL: an analysis of 3307 cases
    A Stengel
    W Kern
    T Haferlach
    M Meggendorfer
    A Fasan
    C Haferlach
    Leukemia, 2017, 31 : 705 - 711