Evaluation of various deformable image registration algorithms for thoracic images

被引:72
|
作者
Kadoya, Noriyuki [1 ]
Fujita, Yukio [1 ]
Katsuta, Yoshiyuki [1 ]
Dobashi, Suguru [2 ]
Takeda, Ken [2 ]
Kishi, Kazuma [3 ]
Kubozono, Masaki [1 ]
Umezawa, Rei [1 ]
Sugawara, Toshiyuki [1 ]
Matsushita, Haruo [1 ]
Jingu, Keiichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tohoku Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
[2] Tohoku Univ, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol Technol,Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
[3] Tohoku Univ Hosp, Aoba Ku, Sendai, Miyagi 9808574, Japan
关键词
radiotherapy; deformable image registration; adaptive radiotherapy; image fusion; ACCURACY; LUNG; RADIOTHERAPY; MOTION;
D O I
10.1093/jrr/rrt093
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We evaluated the accuracy of one commercially available and three publicly available deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms for thoracic four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) images. Five patients with esophagus cancer were studied. Datasets of the five patients were provided by DIR-lab (dir-lab.com) and consisted of thoracic 4D CT images and a coordinate list of anatomical landmarks that had been manually identified. Expert landmark correspondence was used for evaluating DIR spatial accuracy. First, the manually measured displacement vector field (mDVF) was obtained from the coordinate list of anatomical landmarks. Then the automatically calculated displacement vector field (aDVF) was calculated by using the following four DIR algorithms: B-spine implemented in Velocity AI (Velocity Medical, Atlanta, GA, USA), free-form deformation (FFD), Horn-Schunk optical flow (OF) and Demons in DIRART of MATLAB software. Registration error is defined as the difference between mDVF and aDVF. The mean 3D registration errors were 2.7 +/- 0.8 mm for B-spline, 3.6 +/- 1.0 mm for FFD, 2.4 +/- 0.9 mm for OF and 2.4 +/- 1.2 mm for Demons. The results showed that reasonable accuracy was achieved in B-spline, OF and Demons, and that these algorithms have the potential to be used for 4D dose calculation, automatic image segmentation and 4D CT ventilation imaging in patients with thoracic cancer. However, for all algorithms, the accuracy might be improved by using the optimized parameter setting. Furthermore, for B-spline in Velocity AI, the 3D registration error was small with displacements of less than similar to 10 mm, indicating that this software may be useful in this range of displacements.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 182
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Various Deformable Image Registration Algorithms for Abdomen Images with Biomechanically Modelled Deformations
    Liu, Y.
    Zhang, P.
    Hong, J.
    Mageras, G.
    Lu, W.
    Alam, S.
    Deasy, J.
    Cervino, L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [2] Implementation and evaluation of various demons deformable image registration algorithms on a GPU
    Gu, Xuejun
    Pan, Hubert
    Liang, Yun
    Castillo, Richard
    Yang, Deshan
    Choi, Dongju
    Castillo, Edward
    Majumdar, Amitava
    Guerrero, Thomas
    Jiang, Steve B.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (01): : 207 - 219
  • [3] Evaluation of the effect of user-guided deformable image registration of thoracic images on registration accuracy among users
    Nakajima, Yujiro
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Kanai, Takayuki
    Saito, Masahide
    Kito, Satoshi
    Hashimoto, Shimpei
    Karasawa, Katsuyuki
    Jingu, Keiichi
    [J]. MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (03) : 206 - 212
  • [4] A Comparative Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Algorithms Based On the Jacobian
    Li, E.
    Zhong, Z.
    An, Y.
    Huang, S.
    Zheng, W.
    Lian, J.
    Yang, X.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E735 - E735
  • [5] Geometric Analysis and Dosimetric Evaluation of Various Deformable Image Registration (DIR) Algorithms for Abdominal Images with 3D Biomechanically Modelled Deformation
    Liu, Y.
    Zhang, P.
    Hong, J.
    Alam, S. R.
    Kuo, L.
    Hu, Y. C.
    Lu, W.
    Cervino, L. I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E475 - E475
  • [6] Assessment of Deformable Image Registration Algorithms by Using Different Similarity Measures for the Registration Evaluation
    Jurkovic, I.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    Stathakis, S.
    Mavroidis, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3286 - 3287
  • [7] Evaluation of Five Commercially-Available Algorithms for Deformable Image Registration
    Shah, A.
    Pukala, J.
    Johnson, P.
    Staton, R.
    Meeks, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 399 - 399
  • [8] Evaluation of deformable image registration accuracy for CT images of the thorax region
    Sarudis, Sebastian
    Karlsson, Anna
    Bibac, Dan
    Nyman, Jan
    Back, Anna
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 57 : 191 - 199
  • [9] A quantitative evaluation of deformable image registration based on Halcyon MVCBCT images
    Huang, Y.
    Wu, H.
    Wang, W.
    Zhang, Y.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S891 - S891
  • [10] A Comparison of Deformable Image Registration Algorithms as They Apply to 4DCT Lung Images
    Loughery, B.
    Song, W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)