Impact of Wiring Resistance on PV Array Configurations in Harvesting the Maximum Power Under Static and Dynamic Shading Conditions

被引:0
|
作者
Rajani, Kandipati [1 ]
Ramesh, Tejavathu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol Andhra Pradesh, Tadepalligudam, India
关键词
Bridge-link; efficiency; fill factor; global maximum power; honey-comb; photovoltaic array; reconfiguration; Sudoku; total-cross-tied; triple-tied-cross-linked; wiring losses; wiring resistance; PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAY; RECONFIGURATION; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; ENHANCEMENT; MODULES; LOSSES; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1080/03772063.2022.2130454
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Partial shadowing is the primary cause of power degradation in PV systems. There are various methods for harvesting extreme power from a PV array. Proper selection of PV array configuration is one of the strategies to extract maximum power. Cross ties in PV array configurations play a major role in maximizing the power. As the number of cross ties increases, maximum power from PV array increases. But, these cross ties have resistance, which increases the wiring losses, which may result in the decrease of power from the PV array. For the investigation of the impact of wiring resistance (column wiring and cross-ties wiring) under static and dynamic partial shading situations, this paper considers several 9x9 PV array designs such as Series-Parallel, Bridge-Link, Honey-Comb, Total-Cross-Tied, and Triple-Tied-Cross-Linked. The analysis of Total-Cross-Tied and Triple-Tied-Cross-Linked PV array configurations is extended to 18x18 array size. Measures such as global maximum power point, efficiency, fill factor, and mismatch losses were used in the performance analysis. The simulation findings show that, when a large number of panels are shaded statistically, the impact of wiring resistance is significant.
引用
收藏
页码:936 / 964
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conventional and advanced PV array configurations to extract maximum power under partial shading conditions: A review
    Yadav, Anurag Singh
    Mukherjee, V
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 178 : 977 - 1005
  • [2] Hybridization of Solar PV Configurations for Maximum Power Extraction Under Partial Shading Conditions
    Sekhar, A. Chandra
    Ramesh, Tejavathu
    IETE JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2024, 70 (05) : 5411 - 5429
  • [3] Modeling and Analysis of PV Configurations to Extract Maximum Power Under Partial Shading Conditions
    Desai, Aditi Atul
    Mikkili, Suresh
    CSEE JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2022, 8 (06): : 1670 - 1683
  • [4] Power Loss Analysis of Traditional PV Array Configurations Under Different Shading Conditions
    Santosh, B. S. S.
    Ansari, Mohamed Thameem M.
    Kantarao, P.
    Kusuma, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 12 (02): : 1176 - 1203
  • [5] Maximum Power Generation from Novel Triangular-Shaped PV Array Configurations under Partial Shading Conditions
    Anjum, Shahroz
    Mukherjee, Vivekananda
    Mehta, Gitanjali
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2021, 147 (05)
  • [6] Global maximum power point tracking based on ANFIS approach for PV array configurations under partial shading conditions
    Belhachat, Faiza
    Larbes, Cherif
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 77 : 875 - 889
  • [7] A review of PV array reconfiguration techniques for maximum power extraction under partial shading conditions
    Sharma, Dushyant
    Jalil, Mohd Faisal
    Ansari, Mohammad Shariz
    Bansal, R. C.
    OPTIK, 2023, 275
  • [8] PV array reconfiguration techniques for maximum power optimization under partial shading conditions: A review
    Belhachat, Faiza
    Larbes, Cherif
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2021, 230 : 558 - 582
  • [9] A novel monocrystalline PV array configuration for enhancing the maximum power under partial shading conditions
    Vunnam, Sarayu
    Vanithasri, M.
    Alla, RamaKoteswaraRao
    CLEAN ENERGY, 2023, 7 (04): : 783 - 794
  • [10] Analysis and comparison of different PV array configurations under partial shading conditions
    Bingol, Okan
    Ozkaya, Burcin
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 160 : 336 - 343