Greenhouse gas emissions from biogenic waste treatment: options and uncertainty

被引:8
|
作者
Bastian, Lawin [1 ]
Yano, Junya [1 ]
Hirai, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Sakai, Shin-ichi [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Environm Preservat Res Ctr, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068501, Japan
关键词
Biogenic waste treatment; Food waste; Greenhouse gas emissions; Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10163-012-0087-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A simplified life cycle assessment was conducted to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy production from each component of biogenic waste treated in an open dumping site, and by composting, anaerobic digestion, and incineration employed with additional options. The impact of uncertainties and sensitivities of the parameters in the treatment methods were investigated. We conducted a sensitivity analysis to identify the most sensitive parameters, and we discussed the relationship between uncertainty and sensitivity. Our results revealed that the moisture content of food waste and the biomass-derived carbon and methane concentration of the landfill gas of biogenic waste subjected to open dumping are the most sensitive parameters across all the treatment methods. The net GHG emissions from food waste treated in an open dumping site ranged over ten times (0.30 - 3.67 Gg CO2 eq/Gg). In addition, by employing additional options for the open dumping site, including soil cover, a landfill gas collection system, shifting to a semi-aerobic condition, and energy conservation by using a gas engine, we found that the net GHG emissions could be reduced by 10, 27.9, 37.4 %, and up to 56.7 %, respectively. Shifting to a semi-aerobic system is the most effective method for reducing GHG emissions, followed by landfill gas collection.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 60
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Greenhouse gas emissions from biogenic waste treatment: options and uncertainty
    Lawin Bastian
    Junya Yano
    Yasuhiro Hirai
    Shin-ichi Sakai
    [J]. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2013, 15 : 49 - 60
  • [2] Waste management options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from paper in Australia
    Pickin, JG
    Yuen, STS
    Hennings, H
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (04) : 741 - 752
  • [3] Greenhouse gas emissions from mechanical and biological waste treatment of municipal waste
    Clemens, J
    Cuhls, C
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 24 (06) : 745 - 754
  • [4] Greenhouse gas emissions of different waste treatment options for sector-specific commercial and industrial waste in Germany
    Helftewes, Markus
    Flamme, Sabine
    Nelles, Michael
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2012, 30 (04) : 421 - 431
  • [5] Greenhouse gas emissions of food waste disposal options for UK retailers
    Moult, J. A.
    Allan, S. R.
    Hewitt, C. N.
    Berners-Lee, M.
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2018, 77 : 50 - 58
  • [6] Greenhouse gas emissions of waste management processes and options: A case study
    de la Barrera, Belen
    Hooda, Peter S.
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (07) : 658 - 665
  • [7] Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from a biological waste treatment facility
    Jensen, Morten Bang
    Moller, Jacob
    Monster, Jacob
    Scheutz, Charlotte
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 67 : 375 - 384
  • [8] Mitigation options for nitrogenous greenhouse gas emissions from wastewater treatment plants
    Brotto, Ariane Coelho
    Chandran, Kartik
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [9] Addressing Biogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Hydropower in LCA
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (17) : 9604 - 9611
  • [10] Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from waste treatment through microbiological innovation
    Ni, Gaofeng
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY AUSTRALIA, 2023, 44 (01) : 22 - 26