Selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle based on thermodynamic and thermo-economic analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Miao, Zheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Zihang [1 ]
Zhang, Kai [1 ]
Xu, Jinliang [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Yongpan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab Multiphase Flow & Heat Transfer L, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Key Lab Power Stn Energy Transfer Convers & Syst, Minist Educ, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Organic Rankine cycle; Zeotropic mixtures; Thermo-economic analysis; Selection criteria; Levelized energy cost; WASTE HEAT-RECOVERY; WORKING FLUIDS; PURE FLUIDS; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; CRITICAL-TEMPERATURE; EXERGY ANALYSIS; POWER-PLANT; ORC; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115837
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The thermodynamic performance of an organic Rankine cycle can be improved effectively with zeotropic mixtures instead of pure fluid; however, it is quite challenging for the selection of zeotropic mixture to achieve the optimal thermodynamic and thermo-economic performance due to the lack of selection criteria. In this study, the thermodynamic and thermos-economic performance is evaluated in terms of overall exergy efficiency and the levelized energy cost respectively. The criteria for the selection of the optimal zeotropic mixture is revisited. It is found that our previously proposed criteria based on thermodynamic analysis for open heat source also holds for the thermo-economic analysis. Furthermore, the study for the effect of temperature drop on the selection of mixtures is carried out for the closed heat source. It is revealed that the heat source temperature drop can be divided into large, small, and transition regions, and the criteria for selection of optimal zeotropic mixture is proposed for each region. The thermo-economic analysis shows that the optimal thermodynamic and thermoeconomic performance can be obtained simultaneously in the ORC system with the proposed selection criteria.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thermodynamic selection criteria of zeotropic mixtures for subcritical organic Rankine cycle
    Miao, Zheng
    Zhang, Kai
    Wang, Mengxiao
    Xu, Jinliang
    [J]. ENERGY, 2019, 167 : 484 - 497
  • [2] Thermodynamic analysis of organic rankine cycle with zeotropic mixtures
    Bao, Jun-Jiang
    Zhao, Li
    [J]. Kung Cheng Je Wu Li Hsueh Pao/Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35 (08): : 1479 - 1483
  • [3] Thermo-economic modelling and optimization of a zeotropic organic Rankine cycle with composition adjustment
    非共沸混合工质组分调控ORC系统热经济性分析和优化
    [J]. Luo, Xianglong (lxl-dte@gdut.edu.cn), 1600, Materials China (71): : 2373 - 2381
  • [4] Thermodynamic Analysis of Organic Rankine Cycle Based on Binary Zeotropic Mixtures
    采用二元非共沸工质的有机朗肯循环热力学分析
    [J]. 2018, Science Press (46):
  • [5] Thermodynamic analysis of organic Rankine cycle using zeotropic mixtures
    Zhao, Li
    Bao, Junjiang
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 130 : 748 - 756
  • [6] Thermo-economic analysis and selection of working fluid for solar organic Rankine cycle
    Desai, Nishith B.
    Bandyopadhyay, Santanu
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 95 : 471 - 481
  • [7] Thermo-economic comparison of subcritical organic Rankine cycle based on different heat exchanger configurations
    Zhang, Cheng
    Liu, Chao
    Wang, Shukun
    Xu, Xiaoxiao
    Li, Qibin
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 123 : 728 - 741
  • [8] Thermo-Economic Evaluation of Organic Rankine Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation Using Zeotropic Mixtures
    Heberle, Florian
    Brueggemann, Dieter
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2015, 8 (03) : 2097 - 2124
  • [9] Thermo-Economic Analysis of Zeotropic Mixtures and Pure Working Fluids in Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery
    Heberle, Florian
    Brueggemann, Dieter
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (04)
  • [10] Thermo-Economic Analysis of Organic Rankine Cycle for Power Generation
    Thurairaja, Kankeyan
    Wijewardane, Anusha
    Ranasinghe, Chathura
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY (PECON), 2018, : 389 - 393