Perceptions of Partner's Deception in Friends With Benefits Relationships

被引:9
|
作者
Quirk, Kelley [1 ]
Owen, Jesse [1 ]
Fincham, Frank [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
BOOTY-CALL; CASUAL SEX; ATTACHMENT; GENDER; EXPERIENCES; ATTRACTION; SUPPORT; HOOKUPS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/0092623X.2012.668513
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Friends-with-benefits relationships combine elements of friendship with sexual intimacy. Using hierarchical regression, the authors examined perceived deception in 310 relationships. In comparison with men, women reported greater deception by their friends-with-benefits partner. Perceived deception was inversely related to awareness of relational risk factors and directly related to anxious attachment, more sexual interactions as compared with friendship interactions in the relationship, and more favorable attitudes toward ambiguous commitment. Awareness of relational risk factors moderated the association between anxious attachment and perceptions of being deceived as awareness of relational risk factors was only negatively associated with perceived deception for those with lower levels of anxious attachment. Last, gender moderated the association between perceptions of being deceived and anxious attachment in that more anxious attachment was related to perceived deception for women, but not men. In particular, anxious attachment did not predict perceptions of deception for men, but greater degrees of anxious attachment for women increased perceptions of deception. Recommendations for assisting young adults to navigate this relational style are offered.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 57
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biological costs and benefits of social relationships for men and women in adulthood: The role of partner, family and friends
    Rouxel, Patrick
    Chandola, Tarani
    Kumari, Meena
    Seeman, Teresa
    Benzeval, Michaela
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2022, 44 (01) : 5 - 24
  • [2] Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships
    Lisa J. van Raalte
    Lori A. Bednarchik
    Mark A. Generous
    Paul A. Mongeau
    [J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2022, 51 : 1783 - 1792
  • [3] Examining Rules in Friends with Benefits Relationships
    van Raalte, Lisa J.
    Bednarchik, Lori A.
    Generous, Mark A.
    Mongeau, Paul A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, 2022, 51 (03) : 1783 - 1792
  • [4] A longitudinal study of friends with benefits relationships
    Machia, Laura V.
    Proulx, Morgan L.
    Ioerger, Michael
    Lehmiller, Justin J.
    [J]. PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2020, 27 (01) : 47 - 60
  • [5] The negative aspects of friends with benefits relationships
    Wlodarczyk, Ewa
    Chanduszko-Salska, Jolanta
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIA I PSYCHOLOGIA KLINICZNA-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 13 (02): : 116 - 120
  • [6] Friends with benefits relationships as a start to exclusive romantic relationships
    Owen, Jesse
    Fincham, Frank D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2012, 29 (07) : 982 - 996
  • [7] Friends with benefits? Gendered performances in women's casual sexual relationships
    Fahs, Breanne
    Munger, Adrielle
    [J]. PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2015, 22 (02) : 188 - 203
  • [8] ''That's what friends are for'': Children's and teenagers' perceptions of peer relationships in the sport domain
    Weiss, MR
    Smith, AL
    Theeboom, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 18 (04): : 347 - 379
  • [9] Sex Differences in Approaching Friends with Benefits Relationships
    Lehmiller, Justin J.
    VanderDrift, Laura E.
    Kelly, Janice R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (2-3) : 275 - 284
  • [10] Gender, Sexual Agency, and Friends with Benefits Relationships
    Jovanovic J.
    Williams J.C.
    [J]. Sexuality & Culture, 2018, 22 (2) : 555 - 576