Aura and Stroke: relationship and what we have learnt from preclinical models

被引:31
|
作者
Yemisci, Muge [1 ,2 ]
Eikermann-Haerter, Katharina [3 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Inst Neurol Sci & Psychiat, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN | 2019年 / 20卷 / 1期
关键词
Migraine; Aura; Stroke; Spreading depolarization; Cerebrovascular disease; FHM; CADASIL; Pericyte; Microcirculation; FAMILIAL HEMIPLEGIC MIGRAINE; AUTOSOMAL-DOMINANT ARTERIOPATHY; CORTICAL SPREADING DEPRESSION; CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW; SUBCORTICAL INFARCTS; CAPILLARY PERICYTES; EXTRACEREBRAL CIRCULATION; TRANSCRANIAL DOPPLER; ISCHEMIC-INJURY; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1186/s10194-019-1016-x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPopulation-based studies have highlighted a close relationship between migraine and stroke. Migraine, especially with aura, is a risk factor for both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Interestingly, stroke risk is highest for migraineurs who are young and otherwise healthy.Main bodyPreclinical models have provided us with possible mechanisms to explain the increased vulnerability of migraineurs' brains towards ischemia and suggest a key role for enhanced cerebral excitability and increased incidence of microembolic events. Spreading depolarization (SD), a slowly propagating wave of neuronal depolarization, is the electrophysiologic event underlying migraine aura and a known headache trigger. Increased SD susceptibility has been demonstrated in migraine animal models, including transgenic mice carrying human mutations for the migraine-associated syndrome CADASIL and familial hemiplegic migraine (type 1 and 2). Upon experimentally induced SD, these mice develop aura-like neurological symptoms, akin to patients with the respective mutations. Migraine mutant mice also exhibit an increased frequency of ischemia-triggered SDs upon experimental stroke, associated with accelerated infarct growth and worse outcomes. The severe stroke phenotype can be explained by SD-related downstream events that exacerbate the metabolic mismatch, including pericyte contraction and neuroglial inflammation. Pharmacological suppression of the genetically enhanced SD susceptibility normalizes the stroke phenotype in familial hemiplegic migraine mutant mice. Recent epidemiologic and imaging studies suggest that these preclinical findings can be extrapolated to migraine patients. Migraine patients are at risk for particularly cardioembolic stroke. At the same time, studies suggest an increased incidence of coagulopathy, atrial fibrillation and patent foramen ovale among migraineurs, providing a possible path for microembolic induction of SD and, in rare instances, stroke in hyperexcitable brains. Indeed, recent imaging studies document an accelerated infarct progression with only little potentially salvageable brain tissue in acute stroke patients with a migraine history, suggesting an increased vulnerability towards cerebral ischemia.ConclusionPreclinical models suggest a key role for enhanced SD susceptibility and microembolization to explain both the occurrence of migraine attacks and the increased stroke risk in migraineurs. Therapeutic targeting of SD and microembolic events, or potential causes thereof, will be promising for treatment of aura and may also prevent ischemic infarction in vulnerable brains.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aura and Stroke: relationship and what we have learnt from preclinical models
    Muge Yemisci
    Katharina Eikermann-Haerter
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2019, 20
  • [2] What have we learnt from mouse models for the study of malaria?
    Wykes, Michelle N.
    Good, Michael F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2009, 39 (08) : 2004 - 2007
  • [3] Provoked models of asthma: what have we learnt?
    O'Byrne, P. M.
    Gauvreauw, G. M.
    Brannan, J. D.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2009, 39 (02): : 181 - 192
  • [4] What have we learnt from Vioxx?
    Krumholz, Harlan
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Presler, Amos H.
    Egilman, David S.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7585): : 120 - 123
  • [5] What Have We Learnt from 2020?
    Roach, V.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 61 : 139 - 139
  • [6] What have we learnt from AIDS?
    Pinching, AJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (11) : 885 - 886
  • [7] What have we learnt from SARS?
    Weiss, RA
    McLean, AR
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2004, 359 (1447) : 1137 - 1140
  • [8] What have we learnt from Covid?
    Salter, Mark Steven
    BJPSYCH BULLETIN, 2021, 45 (02): : 122 - 123
  • [9] What Have We Learnt From Chernobyl? What Have We Still To Learn?
    Thomas, G. A.
    Tronko, M. D.
    Tsyb, A. F.
    Tuttle, R. M.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 23 (04) : 229 - 233
  • [10] Placental hypoxia: What have we learnt from small animal models?
    Siragher, Emma
    Sferruzzi-Perri, Amanda N.
    PLACENTA, 2021, 113 : 29 - 47