Kinetics of copper desorption from highly calcareous soils

被引:28
|
作者
Ghasemi-Fasaei, R
Maftoun, M
Ronaghi, A [1 ]
Karimian, N
Yasrebi, J
Assad, MT
Ippolito, JA
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
calcareous soils; copper; desorption; kinetics;
D O I
10.1080/00103620600564067
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Desorption of copper (Cu) is an important factor in determining Cu availability in calcareous soils. Kinetics of native and added Cu desorption by DTPA (diethylene-triaminepentaacetic-acid) from 15 highly calcareous soils of southern Iran were studied in a laboratory experiment. Our results showed that two constantrate, Elovich, simple Elovich, and parabolic-diffusion equations were the best-fitted equations among eight kinetic models used. The copper desorption pattern based on the parabolic-diffusion equation revealed that the rate of native Cu desorption was higher in the first 2h followed by a slower release rate, which suggests that two different mechanisms are involved. The trend may describe why the DTPA soil test has been considerably successful in predicting Cu availability in calcareous soils. Stepwise multiple regression equations indicated that CCE (calcium carbonate equivalent), CEC (cation exchange capacity), and clay content are the most important soil characteristics that predict the rate constants of the kinetic models. Mean extractant recovery percentage (ERP) of the soils was only 20%, which indicated that after 20 days, DTPA extracted only one-fifth of added Cu. Regression equations indicated that as soil OM (organic matter) content increased, the value of ERP decreased. From results reported herein it seems that CCE, CEC, and clay are the most important factors controlling Cu release from highly calcareous soils of southern Iran. However, the initial soil Cu desorption rate is probably controlled by CEC.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 809
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Kinetics of copper desorption in selected calcareous soils of Iran
    Padidar, Marjan
    Safavi, Kamran
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2012, 13 (01) : 223 - 227
  • [2] Effects of poultry manure and pistachio compost on the kinetics of copper desorption from two calcareous soils
    Sadegh, Leila
    Fekri, Majid
    Gorgin, Narges
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 5 (04) : 571 - 578
  • [3] Effects of poultry manure and pistachio compost on the kinetics of copper desorption from two calcareous soilsآثار سماد الدواجن وسماد الفستق على حركية امتزاز النحاس اثنين من التربة الجيرية
    Leila Sadegh
    Majid Fekri
    Narges Gorgin
    Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2012, 5 : 571 - 578
  • [4] Adsorption and desorption of copper by calcareous arid soils
    Joshi, DC
    ANNALS OF ARID ZONE, 1995, 34 (04) : 253 - 257
  • [5] Kinetics of phosphorus desorption from calcareous soils using DGT technique
    Heidari, Saber
    Reyhanitabar, Adel
    Oustan, Shahin
    GEODERMA, 2017, 305 : 275 - 280
  • [6] Copper and zinc competitive adsorption: Desorption in calcareous soils
    Mesquita, ME
    Silva, JMVE
    Branco, MAC
    Sequeira, EM
    ARID SOIL RESEARCH AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 14 (01): : 27 - 41
  • [7] Kinetics of copper desorption from soils as affected by different organic ligands
    Elkhatib, E. A.
    Mahdy, A. M.
    Saleh, M. E.
    Barakat, N. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 4 (03) : 331 - 338
  • [8] Desorption Kinetics and Chemical Forms of Phosphorus in Calcareous Soils along a Climotoposequence
    Moazallahi, Masomeh
    Baghernejad, Majid
    Naghavi, Hormazd
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2018, 22 : 35 - 58
  • [9] Kinetics of copper desorption from soils as affected by different organic ligands
    E. A. Elkhatib
    A. M. Mahdy
    M. E. Saleh
    N. H. Barakat
    International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 4 : 331 - 338
  • [10] Kinetics and mechanism of copper release from selected agricultural calcareous soils of northern Iran
    Motlagh, M. Barani
    SOIL RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (04) : 312 - 319