Try, try again: Lessons learned from success and failure in participatory modeling

被引:29
|
作者
Sterling, Eleanor J. [1 ]
Zellner, Moira [2 ]
Jenni, Karen E. [3 ]
Leong, Kirsten [4 ]
Glynn, Pierre D. [5 ]
BenDor, Todd K. [6 ]
Bommel, Pierre [7 ,8 ]
Hubacek, Klaus [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Jetter, Antonie J. [12 ]
Jordan, Rebecca [13 ]
Olabisi, Laura Schmitt [14 ]
Paolisso, Michael [15 ]
Gray, Steven [14 ]
机构
[1] Amer Museum Nat Hist, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat, New York, NY 10024 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Urban Planning & Policy, Chicago, IL USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Sci & Decis Ctr, Box 25046, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[4] NOAA Fisheries, Pacific Isl Fisheries Sci Ctr, Honolulu, HI USA
[5] US Geol Survey, Water Mission Area, 959 Natl Ctr, Reston, VA 22092 USA
[6] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ Montpellier, CIRAD Green, Montpellier, France
[8] UCR, Cieda, San Jose, Costa Rica
[9] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[10] Masaryk Univ, Dept Environm Studies, Brno, Czech Republic
[11] Int Inst Appl Syst Anal, Laxenburg, Austria
[12] Portland State Univ, Dept Engn & Technol Management, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[13] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Human Ecol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[14] Michigan State Univ, Dept Community Sustainabil, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[15] Univ Maryland, Dept Anthropol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Participatory modeling; Collaborative modeling; Stakeholder engagement; Planning; Environmental management; BOUNDARY OBJECTS; MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION; UNCERTAINTY; PERCEPTION; DECISIONS; SYSTEMS; BIASES; LIMITS; RISK;
D O I
10.1525/elementa.347
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Participatory Modeling (PM) is becoming increasingly common in environmental planning and conservation, due in part to advances in cyberinfrastructure as well as to greater recognition of the importance of engaging a diverse array of stakeholders in decision making. We provide lessons learned, based on over 200 years of the authors' cumulative and diverse experience, about PM processes. These include -successful and, perhaps more importantly, not-so-successful trials. Our collective interdisciplinary background has supported the development, testing, and evaluation of a rich range of collaborative modeling approaches. We share here what we have learned as a community of participatory modelers, within three categories of reflection: a) lessons learned about participatory modelers; b) lessons learned about the context of collaboration; and c) lessons learned about the PM process. First, successful PM teams encompass a variety of skills beyond modeling expertise. Skills include: effective relationship-building, openness to learn from local experts, awareness of personal motivations and biases, and ability to translate discussions into models and to assess success. Second, the context for collaboration necessitates a culturally appropriate process for knowledge generation and use, for involvement of community co-leads, and for understanding group power dynamics that might influence how people from different backgrounds interact. Finally, knowing when to use PM and when not to, managing expectations, and effectively and equitably addressing conflicts is essential. Managing the participation process in PM is as important as managing the model building process. We recommend that PM teams consider what skills are present within a team, while ensuring inclusive creative space for collaborative exploration and learning supported by simple yet relevant models. With a realistic view of what it entails, PM can be a powerful approach that builds collective knowledge and social capital, thus helping communities to take charge of their future and address complex social and environmental problems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条