Instance memorization and category influence: Challenging the evidence for multiple systems in category learning

被引:2
|
作者
Johansen, Mark K. [1 ]
Fouquet, Nathalie [2 ]
Savage, Justin [1 ]
Shanks, David R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff CF10 3AT, S Glam, Wales
[2] Swansea Univ, Coll Human & Hlth Sci, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[3] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, London, England
来源
关键词
Category learning; Exemplars; Prototypes; Categorization; Representation; HUMAN CATEGORIZATION; CONNECTIONIST MODEL; CONTEXT THEORY; CLASSIFICATION; SEARCH; RULE; REPRESENTATION; INTUITIVENESS; SIMILARITY; EXEMPLARS;
D O I
10.1080/17470218.2012.735679
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A class of dual-system theories of categorization assumes a categorization system based on actively formed prototypes in addition to a separate instance memory system. It has been suggested that, because they have used poorly differentiated category structures (such as the influential 5-4 structure), studies supporting the alternative exemplar theory reveal little about the properties of the categorization system. Dual-system theories assume that the instance memory system only influences categorization behaviour via similarity to single isolated instances, without generalization across instances. However, we present the results of two experiments employing the 5-4 structure to argue against this. Experiment 1 contrasted learning in the standard 5-4 structure with learning in an even more poorly differentiated 5-4 structure. In Experiment 2, participants memorized the 5-4 structure based on a five minute simultaneous presentation of all nine category instances. Both experiments revealed category influences as reflected by differences in instance learnability and generalization, at variance with the dual-system prediction. These results have implications for the exemplars versus prototypes debate and the nature of human categorization mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:1204 / 1226
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systems
    Elliott M. Waldron
    F. Gregory Ashby
    [J]. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2001, 8 : 168 - 176
  • [2] The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: Evidence for multiple category learning systems
    Waldron, EM
    Ashby, FG
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2001, 8 (01) : 168 - 176
  • [3] Multiple systems of category learning
    Smith, Edward E.
    Grossman, Murray
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2008, 32 (02): : 249 - 264
  • [4] Category learning and multiple memory systems
    Ashby, FG
    O'Brien, JB
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (02) : 83 - 89
  • [5] INSTANCE COMPARISONS DURING CATEGORY LEARNING
    SPALDING, TL
    ROSS, BH
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1992, 30 (06) : 467 - 467
  • [6] Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning
    Cook, Robert G.
    Smith, J. David
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (12) : 1059 - 1067
  • [7] Overconfidence in Nonlinearly Separable Category Structures as Evidence for Dissociable Category Learning Systems
    Schoenherr, Jordan Richard
    Lacroix, Guy
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2014, 68 (04): : 264 - 264
  • [8] Single and multiple systems in categorization and category learning
    Minda, John Paul
    Roark, Casey L.
    Kalra, Priya
    Cruz, Anthony
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 3 (08): : 536 - 551
  • [9] A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning
    Ashby, FG
    Alfonso-Reese, LA
    Turken, AU
    Waldron, EM
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 105 (03) : 442 - 481
  • [10] Individual differences in category learning: Memorization versus rule abstraction
    Jeri L. Little
    Mark A. McDaniel
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2015, 43 : 283 - 297