Commentary on "Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients"

被引:0
|
作者
Macedo, Filipe
机构
关键词
IMPLANTATION; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.repc.2011.08.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The use of transcatheter aortic-valve replacement has been shown to reduce mortality among high-risk patients with aortic stenosis who are not candidates for surgical replacement. However, the two procedures have not been compared in a randomized trial involving high-risk patients who are still candidates for surgical replacement. Methods: At 25 centers, we randomly assigned 699 high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis to undergo either transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable bovine pericardial valve (either a transfemoral or a transapical approach) or surgical replacement. The primary end point was death from any cause at 1 year. The primary hypothesis was that transcatheter replacement is not inferior to surgical replacement. Results: The rates of death from any cause were 3.4% in the transcatheter group and 6.5% in the surgical group at 30 days (P = 0.07) and 24.2% and 26.8%, respectively, at 1 year (P = 0.44), a reduction of 2.6 percentage points in the transcatheter group (upper limit of the 95% confidence interval, 3.0 percentage points; predefined margin, 7.5 percentage points; P = 0.001 for noninferiority). The rates of major stroke were 3.8% in the transcatheter group and 2.1% in the surgical group at 30 days (P = 0.20) and 5.1% and 2.4%, respectively, at 1 year (P = 0.07). At 30 days, major vascular complications were significantly more frequent with transcatheter replacement (11.0% vs. 3.2%, P<0.001); adverse events that were more frequent after surgical replacement included major bleeding (9.3% vs. 19.5%, P<0.001) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (8.6% vs. 16.0%, P = 0.006). More patients undergoing transcatheter replacement had an improvement in symptoms at 30 days, but by 1 year, there was not a significant between-group difference. Conclusions: In high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, transcatheter and surgical procedures for aortic-valve replacement were associated with similar rates of survival at 1 year, although there were important differences in peri-procedural risks.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 880
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
    Smith, Craig R.
    Leon, Martin B.
    Mack, Michael J.
    Miller, Craig
    Moses, Jeffrey W.
    Svensson, Lars G.
    Tuzcu, E. Murat
    Webb, John G.
    Fontana, Gregory P.
    Makkar, Raj R.
    Williams, Mathew
    Dewey, Todd
    Kapadia, Samir
    Babaliaros, Vasilis
    Thourani, Vinod H.
    Corso, Paul
    Pichard, Augusto D.
    Bavaria, Joseph E.
    Herrmann, Howard C.
    Akin, Jodi J.
    Anderson, William N.
    Wang, Duolao
    Pocock, Stuart J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 364 (23): : 2187 - 2198
  • [2] Comparison of the surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients
    Nemec, Petr
    Ondrasek, Jiri
    Malik, Petr
    Tretina, Martin
    Pokorny, Petr
    Poloczek, Martin
    Parenica, Jiri
    Spinar, Jindrich
    Kala, Petr
    COR ET VASA, 2012, 54 (02) : E76 - E83
  • [3] Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in moderate and high-risk patients: a meta-analysis
    Carnero-Alcazar, Manuel
    Carlos Maroto, Luis
    Cobiella-Carnicer, Javier
    Vilacosta, Isidre
    Nombela-Franco, Luis
    Alswies, Ali
    Villagran-Medinilla, Enrique
    Macaya, Carlos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (04) : 644 - 652
  • [4] Days at home after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients
    Chung, Mabel
    Butala, Neel M.
    Faridi, Kamil F.
    Almarzooq, Zaid I.
    Liu, Dingning
    Xu, Jiaman
    Song, Yang
    Baron, Suzanne J.
    Shen, Changyu
    Kazi, Dhruv S.
    Yeh, Robert W.
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 255 : 125 - 136
  • [5] Quality of life in high-risk patients: comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with surgical aortic valve replacement†
    Amonn, Kathrin
    Stortecky, Stefan
    Brinks, Henriette
    Gahl, Brigitta
    Windecker, Stephan
    Wenaweser, Peter
    Carrel, Thierry
    Huber, Christoph
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 43 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [6] Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in High-risk Patients: A propensity-score matched analysis
    Zweng, India
    Shi, William Y.
    Palmer, Sonny
    MacIsaac, Andrew
    Whitbourn, Robert
    Davis, Philip
    Newcomb, Andrew E.
    HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2016, 25 (07): : 661 - 667
  • [7] Selection of aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: a Markov model
    Gada, H. G.
    Marwick, T. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 : 674 - 674
  • [8] Selection of aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients: a Markov model
    Gada, H. G.
    Marwick, T. M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183 : 674 - 674
  • [9] Markov Model for Selection of Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (Without Replacement) in High-Risk Patients
    Gada, Hemal
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    Tuzcu, E. Murat
    Svensson, Lars G.
    Marwick, Thomas H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 109 (09): : 1326 - 1333
  • [10] Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: A propensity score analysis in patients at high surgical risk
    Conradi, Lenard
    Seiffert, Moritz
    Treede, Hendrik
    Silaschi, Miriam
    Baldus, Stephan
    Schirmer, Johannes
    Kersten, Jan-Felix
    Meinertz, Thomas
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 143 (01): : 64 - 71