3D bioprinting of cell-laden scaffolds for intervertebral disc regeneration

被引:51
|
作者
Hu, Duo [1 ]
Wu, Dongwei [1 ]
Huang, Lin [1 ]
Jiao, Yanpeng [1 ]
Li, Lihua [1 ]
Lu, Lu [1 ]
Zhou, Changren [1 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
3D bioprinting; Hydrogel; Poly(lactic acid); Polymeric composites; Biomaterials; GELLAN GUM; HYDROGELS; BIOMATERIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.matlet.2018.03.204
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Mimicking the three-dimensional (3D) biological structure of native tissues and organs has remained a challenge for tissue engineering. The current use of hydrogels for intervertebral disc (IVD) repair is not ideal for insufficient mechanical properties. To overcome this limitation, we combine the excellent mechanical performance of poly (lactic acid) (PLA) with the biocompatibility and bioprintability of gellan gum-poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate (GG-PEGDA) double network hydrogel to meet the necessary requirement of IVD regeneration. The cell-laden constructs were fabricated using 3D bioprinting technology. Mechanical and degradation properties of the dual printed scaffolds can be regulated by controlling the infill patterns and density of the PLA frameworks. Bone marrow stromal cells co-printed into the PLA/GG-PEGDA scaffolds remained high viability and showed excellent spreading within the hydrogels. Considering positive biocompatibility accompanied with suitable mechanical properties, this hybrid scaffolds have the potential to assist IVD regeneration. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 222
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds
    Deo, Kaivalya A.
    Singh, Kanwar Abhay
    Peak, Charles W.
    Alge, Daniel L.
    Gaharwar, Akhilesh K.
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2020, 26 (5-6) : 318 - 338
  • [2] 3D bioprinting of cell-laden constructs for regenerative medicine
    Li, Cuidi
    Cui, Wenguo
    [J]. Engineered Regeneration, 2021, 2 : 195 - 205
  • [3] 3D bioprinting of cell-laden electroconductive MXene nanocomposite bioinks
    Rastin, Hadi
    Zhang, Bingyang
    Mazinani, Arash
    Hassan, Kamrul
    Bi, Jingxiu
    Tran Thanh Tung
    Losic, Dusan
    [J]. NANOSCALE, 2020, 12 (30) : 16069 - 16080
  • [4] 3D BIOPRINTING OF VASCULAR NETWORKS IN CELL-LADEN HYDROGEL CONSTRUCTS
    Bova, Lorenzo
    Falcone, Dario
    Kavanaugh, Aaron
    Micheli, Sara
    Zanella, Luca
    Benya, Paul
    Billi, Fabrizio
    Cimetta, Elisa
    [J]. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2022, 28 : S547 - S547
  • [5] Biofabrication of tissue constructs by 3D bioprinting of cell-laden microcarriers
    Levato, Riccardo
    Visser, Jetze
    Planell, Josep A.
    Engel, Elisabeth
    Malda, Jos
    Mateos-Timoneda, Miguel A.
    [J]. BIOFABRICATION, 2014, 6 (03)
  • [6] 3D Bioprinting of Vascularized, Heterogeneous Cell-Laden Tissue Constructs
    Kolesky, David B.
    Truby, Ryan L.
    Gladman, A. Sydney
    Busbee, Travis A.
    Homan, Kimberly A.
    Lewis, Jennifer A.
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2014, 26 (19) : 3124 - 3130
  • [7] 3D Bioprinting of Oxygenated Cell-Laden Gelatin Methacryloyl Constructs
    Erdem, Ahmet
    Darabi, Mohammad Ali
    Nasiri, Rohollah
    Sangabathuni, Sivakoti
    Ertas, Yavuz Nuri
    Alem, Halima
    Hosseini, Vahid
    Shamloo, Amir
    Nasr, Ali S.
    Ahadian, Samad
    Dokmeci, Mehmet R.
    Khademhosseini, Ali
    Ashammakhi, Nureddin
    [J]. ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2020, 9 (15)
  • [8] 3D bioprinting of complex channels within cell-laden hydrogels
    Ji, Shen
    Almeida, Emily
    Guvendiren, Murat
    [J]. ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2019, 95 : 214 - 224
  • [9] 3D Bioprinting of Cell-Laden Hydrogels for Improved Biological Functionality
    Hull, Sarah M.
    Brunel, Lucia G.
    Heilshorn, Sarah C.
    [J]. ADVANCED MATERIALS, 2022, 34 (02)
  • [10] 3D bioprinting of cell-laden hydrogels for advanced tissue engineering
    Blaeser, Andreas
    Campos, Daniela Filipa Duarte
    Fischer, Horst
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 2 : 58 - 66